Research Engineer at a educational organization with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
2024-09-24T07:52:00Z
Sep 24, 2024
The pricing is slightly higher than expected, but it is manageable for our current project. For the upcoming projects, we are looking for cost-effective solutions.
SUSE Linux Enterprise is reasonably priced compared to other operating systems. I find it's a much better option for us than Oracle, for example, because of the pricing structure. The pricing is easier to explain to clients and makes it easier to get clients' commitment. The licensing is also simpler to manage and keep track of. Their responsiveness is great - they give feedback very quickly when we ask questions about licensing or other aspects. This helps ensure we're always at the gold standard regarding licensing and everything related to SUSE Linux Enterprise.
I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price. In terms of the additional costs attached to the solution, I would say that my company has purchased a few add-ons for SUSE Linux Enterprise, but they are all different products.
The license comes directly from Mitel since it is personalized distribution, and everything depends on that particular distribution. Regarding pricing, everybody would want it to be cheaper. It's not just one person who is working on the solution. So, there are a lot of people who work for that particular software to maintain its high level of valuation, and they should be paid for their work.
Enterprise Systems Engineer at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-01-17T12:35:30Z
Jan 17, 2023
In terms of cost, they are cheaper than Red Hat. I'd rate the affordability of pricing six out of ten. For SUSE Linux, currently, we normally use the free versions that come with both patching and support for patching. We normally pay for support whenever we need to, so they'll charge us for every hour after the engineer has connected.
General Manager at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Real User
2021-12-13T19:07:00Z
Dec 13, 2021
As with all commercially supported open source software, there is no license fee for this solution, users buy annual or multi-year support subscriptions.
Team leader technical support at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
2021-07-19T20:19:41Z
Jul 19, 2021
There is a free tier and a paid support tier. If you do not need support, then the solution is free to use. If you need support then there is an option for that as well.
Data Solution Architect at Econet Wireless Zimbabwe
Real User
Top 10
2020-09-29T05:58:00Z
Sep 29, 2020
When we first implemented this product, we had licenses for support. Although because of the stability of the systems, we did not use it much so we scaled down on support.
SUSE Linux Enterprise is a versatile operating system ideal for deploying solutions, managing applications, and running certain applications. It is also used for migrating SAP workloads to the cloud, integrating with SAP HANA solutions and products, and as an operating system for application servers.
The solution is praised for its YaST tool for easier server administration, compatibility with Oracle and SAP, stability, scalability, ease of use, extensive documentation, pacemaker...
The pricing is slightly higher than expected, but it is manageable for our current project. For the upcoming projects, we are looking for cost-effective solutions.
SUSE Linux Enterprise is reasonably priced compared to other operating systems. I find it's a much better option for us than Oracle, for example, because of the pricing structure. The pricing is easier to explain to clients and makes it easier to get clients' commitment. The licensing is also simpler to manage and keep track of. Their responsiveness is great - they give feedback very quickly when we ask questions about licensing or other aspects. This helps ensure we're always at the gold standard regarding licensing and everything related to SUSE Linux Enterprise.
The tool is expensive compared to Red Hat. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten.
The product's licensing options align well with the evolving landscape of Linux variants.
The solution’s subscription is dependent on the organisation like how they have a contract with the company.
I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price. In terms of the additional costs attached to the solution, I would say that my company has purchased a few add-ons for SUSE Linux Enterprise, but they are all different products.
The product is expensive. We purchase its yearly license.
The price is reasonable. The product must provide a pay-as-you-go model of licensing.
The platform is affordable. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
The license comes directly from Mitel since it is personalized distribution, and everything depends on that particular distribution. Regarding pricing, everybody would want it to be cheaper. It's not just one person who is working on the solution. So, there are a lot of people who work for that particular software to maintain its high level of valuation, and they should be paid for their work.
In terms of cost, they are cheaper than Red Hat. I'd rate the affordability of pricing six out of ten. For SUSE Linux, currently, we normally use the free versions that come with both patching and support for patching. We normally pay for support whenever we need to, so they'll charge us for every hour after the engineer has connected.
The pricing was recently raised. They are not as competitive as they were before.
The price of SUSE Linux Enterprise could be cheaper. Other solutions, such as Red Hat.
As with all commercially supported open source software, there is no license fee for this solution, users buy annual or multi-year support subscriptions.
The license we pay is for Oracle. We make use of the community edition.
The price of Linux Enterprise could be lower.
There is a free tier and a paid support tier. If you do not need support, then the solution is free to use. If you need support then there is an option for that as well.
I have to pay for a license in order to get support.
I haven't kept up on licensing costs, I haven't been selling or supporting products on a day to day basis.
When we first implemented this product, we had licenses for support. Although because of the stability of the systems, we did not use it much so we scaled down on support.