What is your primary use case for Aruba Instant On Access Points?

I am responsible for meeting customer expectations with the most appropriate IT solutions. I provide equipment recommendations based on customer needs and availability. Additionally, I have worked with Aruba access points, among other equipment.

In general, we have a good experience with Unifi switches in our conference rooms. However, we have faced several issues in the last year. We tried changing the cabling, switch, and power injector, but the problems persisted. We also use Unifi in hotels and conference rooms, but only one conference room uses Aruba due to its larger size.

We have a lot of examples of use cases, but the greatest project is with the Sao Paulo government and the Brazilian government. It’s the biggest project using this kind.

The first step I normally use to install my network devices, in this case, Aruba Instant On Access Points, is to upgrade them to the best available. The second one is the configuration of the network IT management. The VLAN and mining areas ensure it is steady, and then I do some tests, and finally, I do the implementation. In my company, we use Aruba Instant On Access Points with one or two other switches. The first tool I am implementing in the Mexico region is HPE Aruba Networking CX 6100 Switch Series.

Aruba Instant On Access Points are primarily used for small offices, private houses, or apartments. The ease of installation and deployment is valuable. The user-friendly interface allows you to manage the equipment easily via smartphone, laptop, or tablet, and you can access it instantly over the internet.

I'm in the warehousing business, and we use the solution to create a kind of LAN in the warehouse.

Most of my clients use them for indoor Wi-Fi access, but I also have some experience with outdoor deployments and public-facing setups. We've also worked with Cisco Meraki for similar scenarios.

We use the solution for Wi-Fi solutions.

It is well-suited for small and medium-sized enterprises or departments.

Regarding the product's use cases, the solution is good, or else people would have reached out to us complaining about its performance or faulty equipment.

We have several good use cases where we don't have the need for a controller in a couple of locations or for small office areas. In those situations, Aruba Instant is a good solution. It provides similar mobility access advantages as Cisco, so we have a similar experience with the Instant AP. This is particularly useful when we don't require a controller. In such cases, the APIs are very helpful for small wireless deployments, managing around six to eight access points, and providing all the necessary wireless capabilities. It's a cost-effective solution, similar to Cisco, for supporting small deployments.

We primarily use the solution for low or indoor coverage. We use it in our factory.

It's a wireless WAN solution.

I have installed Aruba Instant On Access Points in a place where the WiFi works better on my site.

There are a couple of different use cases. The first one is that I bought it for my home because I needed a dedicated Wi-Fi access point, and I was intrigued with the way it sets up. I enjoyed the performance of it, and I recommended it to a friend of mine who was totally non-tech savvy. The thing that was super cool about it was that he was able to plug it in at home, give me a phone call, read me the serial number, and I was able to provision it remotely. I also use it at work. It is something that's convenient for other engineers to hop on real quick and do unhindered testing. I'm using AP12, and I'm using the 1900 switch series. It is 1930 or something like that.

We use this solution for our wireless employee network and the wireless guest network for our clients. We have it for personal devices as well. It runs the wireless network for the company.

Aruba Instant On Access Points is used to access a network.

We mostly use it for offices.

Our primary use case is to give users access to WiFi in the office.