What is your primary use case for Cisco Wireless WAN?

We are using Cisco Wireless WAN for our staff to access our system. They are using wireless connections with notebooks and connecting to the access points.

Our use cases span corporate segments, banking, and large enterprises, where we leverage Cisco Wireless WAN for its flexible deployment options and comprehensive feature set.

We have it on campus. When the users try to connect to the WAN, we have to use that for this objective, or we have to make a wireless independent Wi-Fi using Cisco Umbrella for Meraki. Those are the two cases we use.

I use the solution in my company since it is a deep and developed solution. It is also reasonably priced. The tool is scalable.

I worked for a university in Florida that wanted a campus Wi-Fi. So, we chose Cisco and deployed it on the entire campus. It was part of a bigger project that included firewalls.

We use Cisco Wireless WAN in our academic institution, both on the campus-wide and dormitory networks.

We have around nearly 150 access points. We use Cisco access points for our business core systems for the employees. All the users connect through this wirelessly.

We use Cisco Wireless WAN to provide wireless WAN for our company.

We primarily used the solution for wireless connectivity. We used it for daily work. We use our own laptops, and the solution allows us to connect to the network at work.

It's for networking, specifically for network access to our Internet.

I primarily use Cisco Wireless WAN for meetings and to let mobile devices connect to WiFi.

We use Cisco Wireless WAN for the network in our office. The solution is deployed on-premises. There are currently 20 people who use this solution in my organization. They're technical staff and salespeople.

Cisco Wireless WAN works well in an enterprise environment.

We just basically use it for wireless throughout our office space.

Our primary use case for this solution is setting up a wireless source for our clients to connect to the VPNs and our data centers.

We needed a controller-based wireless solution for a medium-sized office environment that can support six to 10 APs. We have around 35 users in our office.

We primarily use this product to provide general wireless network access.

We just deliver wireless coverage, general and specific, for auditoriums and stuff like that.

We primarily use the solution for WiFi and for switching switches. It offers a wireless controller device and access points and switches.

Our primary use for the solution is providing internet access points for our customers, we are a Wi-Fi management service.

We're a higher ed campus. So, we have Cisco Wireless prevalent throughout all of our buildings for students, faculty, and staff to access the network. We are using its latest version.

We are a hotel. We primarily use the solution for wireless access for the hotel and for accommodations.

We use Cisco Wireless WAN for our internal and guests users. We have recently migrated to the newest version of the solution.

I'm a solution architect and consultant in my company (a Cisco partner and system integrator) and our standard use case for Cisco Wireless LAN is providing WiFi coverage throughout our client organizations' buildings. These organizations include banks, airports, and universities. We also use other networking products from Cisco, including Cisco Meraki for cloud-based wireless networking in smaller environments.

I use the solution for wireless and mobile users, data sharing and file and print servers. We use the solution for conducting nearly all our services.

We have many computers that we have connected to this network device.

This product makes up part of our wireless network infrastructure.

Our primary use case of this solution is for streaming access to the personal devices of students and staff for guest wifi and connection. So we provide corporate access to devices. They use it for media streaming, for social networking, for learning solutions. Most people don't connect through land cable anymore - they all go for wireless options.

I've been designing wireless solutions and have been a solutions provider for over 20 years. I spec the solution based on the client's requirements and use whichever vendor device is affordable, and fits the purpose of the company's requirements. We mainly use the WLC 5000 series. We use other Cisco products, mainly geared to smaller markets. I use Cisco and Dell devices, but mostly Cisco, as in the switching arena. I'm most familiar with cloud management and wireless Cisco solutions such as the WMM. I'm not familiar with the Cisco CSR or Cisco Cloud Services Router 1000V. In terms of WLAN solutions, it all comes down to the business requirements and commercials. I would tend to use Cisco at the higher end if the commercial can afford it, but it also depends if it's fit for purpose on the NRL hive. I also use Ubiquiti and I've also started to look at Campion as well. But it really depends on the requirements. External, Ubiquiti, internal Cisco, and Aerohive.

We use Cisco Wireless WAN for normal campus access, for voice roaming, regular setup, some employee networks, network using portals, and simple registrations.

The primary use case for this solution is supplying Wi-Fi to public users. We have been using this solution for 3D uploading and providing resources for users. Our goal is to offload traffic from mobile devices while people are at work. We have been installing this solution in malls, the university, and other buildings. We have deployed this solution across the whole country.

I'm a user, administrator, and implementer of Wireless WAN. I work in a large company and we use the system throughout our campus sites. We mainly use version 5508 and for smaller sites, we use 2504. There are more recent products but I don't have experience with them. We currently have 50,000 people using the Cisco Wireless WAN and have no plans for further expansion.

We use this solution to provide wireless service in our hospitals.