We wanted to have synthetic monitoring transactions in place, and we have used it for a while with previous tools. It’s basically Topaz or HP, then Micro Focus, and now it’s OpenText. We used it for almost 10 to 15 years on various applications, both public-facing and internal. We needed synthetic monitoring transactions in place, and that’s why we deployed this and looked at the BPM SaaS. It was the right one to choose at that point in time, mainly being a strategic tool. That’s why we implemented this functionality using Micro Focus.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, AppDynamics, Dynatrace and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: November 2024.
We wanted to have synthetic monitoring transactions in place, and we have used it for a while with previous tools. It’s basically Topaz or HP, then Micro Focus, and now it’s OpenText. We used it for almost 10 to 15 years on various applications, both public-facing and internal. We needed synthetic monitoring transactions in place, and that’s why we deployed this and looked at the BPM SaaS. It was the right one to choose at that point in time, mainly being a strategic tool. That’s why we implemented this functionality using Micro Focus.
The solution is primarily used for monitoring complex transactions and real user experience modeling.