I would recommend it to other users because I know the pros and cons. The cons are something we can take care of. We’ll be able to cover off the risk because I know the things now. But the pros are much more significant, and that’s the reason I would recommend it. There were challenges, but that’s something we can manage. Even though there are issues with support and other things, if you look at the overall tool, I am pretty much happy with it. So I would rate it around nine out of ten. That’s based on my experience. I would recommend it, and I would go for it.
Presales Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-11-02T15:38:00Z
Nov 2, 2021
I would rate Micro Focus BPM an eight out of ten. The requirements should be clear before choosing the product. If the requirements are not clear, I think there might be a problem. The goal and vision have to be clear before BPM can be picked. This is a generic statement, but if anybody wants to do synthetic monitoring across the world, I think it's the best suitable product
Sr Information Technology Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-08-23T17:52:37Z
Aug 23, 2021
We have been using Micro Focus solutions for 20 years. We've been customers for a very long time. I am not using the latest version of the solution. BPM was discontinued a number of years ago. We're basically moving over to APM. It's a very good solution, however, it's a standalone solution. There are newer solutions, such as APM, BigPanda, or Datadog. These are stronger solutions in my book. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Splunk, Dynatrace and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: February 2025.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability help improve the efficiency of applications by providing visibility and insights into system performance.
Application Performance Monitoring and Observability involve tracking and analyzing the performance of applications and infrastructure. APM focuses on detecting and diagnosing performance issues, while Observability emphasizes gaining insight into the internal state of systems. By combining these approaches, IT teams can ensure...
I would recommend it to other users because I know the pros and cons. The cons are something we can take care of. We’ll be able to cover off the risk because I know the things now. But the pros are much more significant, and that’s the reason I would recommend it. There were challenges, but that’s something we can manage. Even though there are issues with support and other things, if you look at the overall tool, I am pretty much happy with it. So I would rate it around nine out of ten. That’s based on my experience. I would recommend it, and I would go for it.
I would rate Micro Focus BPM an eight out of ten. The requirements should be clear before choosing the product. If the requirements are not clear, I think there might be a problem. The goal and vision have to be clear before BPM can be picked. This is a generic statement, but if anybody wants to do synthetic monitoring across the world, I think it's the best suitable product
We have been using Micro Focus solutions for 20 years. We've been customers for a very long time. I am not using the latest version of the solution. BPM was discontinued a number of years ago. We're basically moving over to APM. It's a very good solution, however, it's a standalone solution. There are newer solutions, such as APM, BigPanda, or Datadog. These are stronger solutions in my book. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.