I would recommend it to other users because I know the pros and cons. The cons are something we can take care of. We’ll be able to cover off the risk because I know the things now. But the pros are much more significant, and that’s the reason I would recommend it. There were challenges, but that’s something we can manage. Even though there are issues with support and other things, if you look at the overall tool, I am pretty much happy with it. So I would rate it around nine out of ten. That’s based on my experience. I would recommend it, and I would go for it.
Presales Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-11-02T15:38:00Z
Nov 2, 2021
I would rate Micro Focus BPM an eight out of ten. The requirements should be clear before choosing the product. If the requirements are not clear, I think there might be a problem. The goal and vision have to be clear before BPM can be picked. This is a generic statement, but if anybody wants to do synthetic monitoring across the world, I think it's the best suitable product
Sr Information Technology Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-08-23T17:52:37Z
Aug 23, 2021
We have been using Micro Focus solutions for 20 years. We've been customers for a very long time. I am not using the latest version of the solution. BPM was discontinued a number of years ago. We're basically moving over to APM. It's a very good solution, however, it's a standalone solution. There are newer solutions, such as APM, BigPanda, or Datadog. These are stronger solutions in my book. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, AppDynamics, Dynatrace and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: October 2024.
I would recommend it to other users because I know the pros and cons. The cons are something we can take care of. We’ll be able to cover off the risk because I know the things now. But the pros are much more significant, and that’s the reason I would recommend it. There were challenges, but that’s something we can manage. Even though there are issues with support and other things, if you look at the overall tool, I am pretty much happy with it. So I would rate it around nine out of ten. That’s based on my experience. I would recommend it, and I would go for it.
I would rate Micro Focus BPM an eight out of ten. The requirements should be clear before choosing the product. If the requirements are not clear, I think there might be a problem. The goal and vision have to be clear before BPM can be picked. This is a generic statement, but if anybody wants to do synthetic monitoring across the world, I think it's the best suitable product
We have been using Micro Focus solutions for 20 years. We've been customers for a very long time. I am not using the latest version of the solution. BPM was discontinued a number of years ago. We're basically moving over to APM. It's a very good solution, however, it's a standalone solution. There are newer solutions, such as APM, BigPanda, or Datadog. These are stronger solutions in my book. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.