The solution could be improved by reducing false positives, optimizing performance, improving the user interface, and integrating with other security solutions.
User experience can be improved. Performance can be improved in terms of speed, reliability, and scalability. The solution can also be improved in terms of features and customer support.
Especialista em Segurança da Informação - DFIR at Omni Banco
Real User
2024-04-24T14:40:28Z
Apr 24, 2024
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade could improve by focusing more on promoting and marketing its products. Despite having a great solution, it hasn't captured a larger market share, possibly due to insufficient promotion. It should also incorporate a module to monitor client identities, similar to CrowdStrike. It could also improve by systemizing and simplifying their documentation to make it easier to find needed information.
Installation time could be improved as it takes too long to install. With the software footprint, it should be taking less than the time it took to install. In the future, I hope to see faster installation and easier installation on our platform as time is equal to money.
Mobile solutions should be added to Check Point because business email is also used by users on mobile devices. And that solution, I cannot process by Check Point Firewalls.
I don't have any kind of point to improve because that's working well from my understanding and from my experience. I can say that the solution's price level is a problematic area that needs to be considered for improvement. Prices could be cheaper.
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
Support is really an area that needs to be improved, as they currently take a very long time to resolve cases, which is not acceptable. The support language is only English. They could expand other languages to expand more easily and help the client in a better way. Regarding cost management, they are only accessible through a partner. This makes it more difficult to find pricing and do budgeting. In terms of the ease of documentation, sometimes it is a bit difficult to find the correct information about the product.
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade must make some improvements in its software. Check Point must also improve in some administrative parts and support. In the software, they should improve: * False positives to help prevent blocking of legitimate emails. * An easy interface. Right now, the UI is hard to navigate or understand. * AI-based threat detection could be enhanced to improve security. Prices must be improved since it is not within the reach of many companies. They must also improve technical support, which is not very efficient in resolving cases.
Cloud Engineer at IT Quest Solutions|interglobalmsp
User
Top 5
2022-12-14T15:10:00Z
Dec 14, 2022
One of the problems that should be improved is the technical support. They have failed us in various aspects. With regard to the Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade tool, they should improve how the antispam functions could be updated. The unwanted SAMPs arrive late. Despite all these small details, the tool fulfills the function that it was created for. It is 100% covering and giving security and thus keeps our collaborators safe against any threat.
I strongly suggest they incorporate and offer more customized features that will enhance efficiency to improve outcomes. Also, they need to offer customizable features for email protection from multiple ends. Recognizing spammers and spam email sourcing is extremely lagging these days, and the performance could be improved to provide better efficiency. It is extremely easy to understand, even for non-technical users. It is easy to manage and integrate well with all kinds of portals and dashboards so that a secure environment can always be attained.
Senior Manager at Agriculture Skill Council of India (ASCI)
User
2022-10-17T10:42:00Z
Oct 17, 2022
The high-end protection of email servers from any advanced foreign agents and malware is not 100% there currently. They could improve on technically sound features to ensure complete and all-around protection of email servers from potential ransomware and unauthorized endpoints. The software should be made more mature and scalable so that it becomes a one size fits all kind of software for all organizations and businesses. It should be scalable for all kinds of changing environments.
Information Technology Specialist at Tech Mahindra
Real User
Top 5
2022-09-26T02:37:00Z
Sep 26, 2022
Check Point Anti-Spam & Email Security is a highly organized tool with many benefits. However, they should upgrade support services and make a more user-friendly database. That would help with higher integration and adoption. Check Point Anti-Spam & Email Security software as a platform will catch the eyes of large organizations and MNCs as security concerns have risen significantly in recent years.
Senior Manager at Advertising Standards Council of India
Real User
Top 10
2022-08-22T06:20:00Z
Aug 22, 2022
There could be an extension of the trial period to 60 days. We felt that utilities and functionalities are numerous and can only be tested fully with the extension of the trial period. It needs more and more robust features around spam restriction and stoppage of malware entry. It can be facilitated so that 100% efficiency can be achieved. There should be more and more inclusion of technical inputs and feedback from customers and business users. These should be regularly received and introduced so that we can stay relevant.
For the few years that I have been using Check Point, they have always presented new updates and tries to stay ahead with their tools making them more interactive with the user and not so complicated. They are always at the forefront with new features. It meets and covers all the necessary fields to protect an organization and must be at the forefront as hackers are always one step ahead. They need to continue to make the tool more robust to protect users from new threats. A major area for improvement is within some of the heavily discounted software blade add-ons on top of the current Next Generation Threat Prevention and SandBlast and Next Generation Threat Prevention offerings.
Cloud Support at a tech company with 51-200 employees
User
2022-05-20T05:07:00Z
May 20, 2022
The Check Point blade could improve perhaps in having an independent solution in the future so as not to be managed if possible through a Check Point gateway. It should be the customer's choice. The dependency on the version of management and gateway that you have can make your console look a bit outdated. It is an expensive product yet really one of the best on the market. Still, they could continue to improve on it.
Executive IT Operations at Indian Immunologicals Limited
Real User
2021-12-21T10:07:00Z
Dec 21, 2021
In terms of anti-spam and email, the pattern that they use to filter the emails could be improved. There are too many normal emails being considered spam. There should be an option to learn the different patterns specific to the organization where it is being deployed.
Cybersecurity specialist at a maritime company with 10,001+ employees
User
2021-10-03T11:56:00Z
Oct 3, 2021
Determining areas for improvement is not a question that can be answered simply. We should separate the antispam engine into two parts; the first that breaks down mass spam, and the second for refinement. It would be good to dedicate a separate core, at least for the first phase, so that it does not take away resources from the system. The ideal approach would be to enrich the product with more functions, however, this would likely also lead to an increase in cost. It would be useful to have more logs and in aggregate mode, perhaps through a specific report, that can be more easily used for troubleshooting.
System and Network Administrator at Auriga - The banking e-volution
Real User
2021-05-08T11:58:00Z
May 8, 2021
Determining areas for improvement is not a question that can be answered simply. I think we should separate the antispam engine into two parts; the first that breaks down mass spam, and the second for refinement. It would be good to dedicate a separate core at least for the first phase so that it does not take away resources from the system. The ideal approach would be to enrich the product with more functions but this I imagine would also lead to an increase in cost. It would be useful to have more logs and in aggregate mode, perhaps through a specific report, that can be more easily used for troubleshooting.
Senior Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-03-27T07:29:00Z
Mar 27, 2021
Our solution required multiple appliances, as a single appliance only supports up to 5,000 files. This means that depending upon the number of files that need to be processed, the number of appliances needs to be increased. Essentially, the number of appliances needs to be sized accordingly for complete protection. The increase in the number of appliances makes it difficult to manage in terms of physical connectivity and configuration. The product performs only basic anti-spam capabilities, compared to CloudGuard SaaS, which provides more robust anti-spamming functionality than the on-premises solution. YARA rules can be added only using the CLI, rather than through the GUI, which makes it difficult for the administrator.
I think that the pricing for the Check Point products should be reconsidered, as we found it to be quite expensive to purchase and to maintain. Maintenance requires that the licenses and the support services be prolonged regularly. Alternatively, they should create some additional bundles of the software blades with significant discounts in addition to the current Next Generation Threat Prevention & SandBlast (NGTX) and Next Generation Threat Prevention (NGTP) offers. We have also had several support cases opened for software issues, but none of them were connected with the Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade.
The manageability using this console is complex and it should be a little more user-friendly. If you don't have a good understanding of putting the policies in place then sometimes it is tough to manage from the console. A more intuitive GUI would make it easier to manage. The user should be able to perform a real-time search of the objects and see the messages. As it is now, when we create an object, sometimes you find out at a later stage that the object already exists. If I could simply type an object into the search bar and find out whether it exists by seeing it in a dropdown then it would save me time.
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from the growing threat of spam and email-based attacks. With advanced threat prevention capabilities, it ensures that businesses can effectively manage their email security and prevent the infiltration of malicious content.This software blade offers a multi-layered approach to email security, combining anti-spam, anti-virus, and anti-phishing technologies to provide robust...
The solution could be improved by reducing false positives, optimizing performance, improving the user interface, and integrating with other security solutions.
User experience can be improved. Performance can be improved in terms of speed, reliability, and scalability. The solution can also be improved in terms of features and customer support.
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade could improve by focusing more on promoting and marketing its products. Despite having a great solution, it hasn't captured a larger market share, possibly due to insufficient promotion. It should also incorporate a module to monitor client identities, similar to CrowdStrike. It could also improve by systemizing and simplifying their documentation to make it easier to find needed information.
Installation time could be improved as it takes too long to install. With the software footprint, it should be taking less than the time it took to install. In the future, I hope to see faster installation and easier installation on our platform as time is equal to money.
Mobile solutions should be added to Check Point because business email is also used by users on mobile devices. And that solution, I cannot process by Check Point Firewalls.
I don't have any kind of point to improve because that's working well from my understanding and from my experience. I can say that the solution's price level is a problematic area that needs to be considered for improvement. Prices could be cheaper.
If you face any configuration problems, you have to involve the Check Point team so they can verify their software.
Support is really an area that needs to be improved, as they currently take a very long time to resolve cases, which is not acceptable. The support language is only English. They could expand other languages to expand more easily and help the client in a better way. Regarding cost management, they are only accessible through a partner. This makes it more difficult to find pricing and do budgeting. In terms of the ease of documentation, sometimes it is a bit difficult to find the correct information about the product.
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade must make some improvements in its software. Check Point must also improve in some administrative parts and support. In the software, they should improve: * False positives to help prevent blocking of legitimate emails. * An easy interface. Right now, the UI is hard to navigate or understand. * AI-based threat detection could be enhanced to improve security. Prices must be improved since it is not within the reach of many companies. They must also improve technical support, which is not very efficient in resolving cases.
One of the problems that should be improved is the technical support. They have failed us in various aspects. With regard to the Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade tool, they should improve how the antispam functions could be updated. The unwanted SAMPs arrive late. Despite all these small details, the tool fulfills the function that it was created for. It is 100% covering and giving security and thus keeps our collaborators safe against any threat.
I strongly suggest they incorporate and offer more customized features that will enhance efficiency to improve outcomes. Also, they need to offer customizable features for email protection from multiple ends. Recognizing spammers and spam email sourcing is extremely lagging these days, and the performance could be improved to provide better efficiency. It is extremely easy to understand, even for non-technical users. It is easy to manage and integrate well with all kinds of portals and dashboards so that a secure environment can always be attained.
The high-end protection of email servers from any advanced foreign agents and malware is not 100% there currently. They could improve on technically sound features to ensure complete and all-around protection of email servers from potential ransomware and unauthorized endpoints. The software should be made more mature and scalable so that it becomes a one size fits all kind of software for all organizations and businesses. It should be scalable for all kinds of changing environments.
Check Point Anti-Spam & Email Security is a highly organized tool with many benefits. However, they should upgrade support services and make a more user-friendly database. That would help with higher integration and adoption. Check Point Anti-Spam & Email Security software as a platform will catch the eyes of large organizations and MNCs as security concerns have risen significantly in recent years.
There could be an extension of the trial period to 60 days. We felt that utilities and functionalities are numerous and can only be tested fully with the extension of the trial period. It needs more and more robust features around spam restriction and stoppage of malware entry. It can be facilitated so that 100% efficiency can be achieved. There should be more and more inclusion of technical inputs and feedback from customers and business users. These should be regularly received and introduced so that we can stay relevant.
For the few years that I have been using Check Point, they have always presented new updates and tries to stay ahead with their tools making them more interactive with the user and not so complicated. They are always at the forefront with new features. It meets and covers all the necessary fields to protect an organization and must be at the forefront as hackers are always one step ahead. They need to continue to make the tool more robust to protect users from new threats. A major area for improvement is within some of the heavily discounted software blade add-ons on top of the current Next Generation Threat Prevention and SandBlast and Next Generation Threat Prevention offerings.
The Check Point blade could improve perhaps in having an independent solution in the future so as not to be managed if possible through a Check Point gateway. It should be the customer's choice. The dependency on the version of management and gateway that you have can make your console look a bit outdated. It is an expensive product yet really one of the best on the market. Still, they could continue to improve on it.
In terms of anti-spam and email, the pattern that they use to filter the emails could be improved. There are too many normal emails being considered spam. There should be an option to learn the different patterns specific to the organization where it is being deployed.
Determining areas for improvement is not a question that can be answered simply. We should separate the antispam engine into two parts; the first that breaks down mass spam, and the second for refinement. It would be good to dedicate a separate core, at least for the first phase, so that it does not take away resources from the system. The ideal approach would be to enrich the product with more functions, however, this would likely also lead to an increase in cost. It would be useful to have more logs and in aggregate mode, perhaps through a specific report, that can be more easily used for troubleshooting.
Determining areas for improvement is not a question that can be answered simply. I think we should separate the antispam engine into two parts; the first that breaks down mass spam, and the second for refinement. It would be good to dedicate a separate core at least for the first phase so that it does not take away resources from the system. The ideal approach would be to enrich the product with more functions but this I imagine would also lead to an increase in cost. It would be useful to have more logs and in aggregate mode, perhaps through a specific report, that can be more easily used for troubleshooting.
Our solution required multiple appliances, as a single appliance only supports up to 5,000 files. This means that depending upon the number of files that need to be processed, the number of appliances needs to be increased. Essentially, the number of appliances needs to be sized accordingly for complete protection. The increase in the number of appliances makes it difficult to manage in terms of physical connectivity and configuration. The product performs only basic anti-spam capabilities, compared to CloudGuard SaaS, which provides more robust anti-spamming functionality than the on-premises solution. YARA rules can be added only using the CLI, rather than through the GUI, which makes it difficult for the administrator.
I think that the pricing for the Check Point products should be reconsidered, as we found it to be quite expensive to purchase and to maintain. Maintenance requires that the licenses and the support services be prolonged regularly. Alternatively, they should create some additional bundles of the software blades with significant discounts in addition to the current Next Generation Threat Prevention & SandBlast (NGTX) and Next Generation Threat Prevention (NGTP) offers. We have also had several support cases opened for software issues, but none of them were connected with the Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade.
The manageability using this console is complex and it should be a little more user-friendly. If you don't have a good understanding of putting the policies in place then sometimes it is tough to manage from the console. A more intuitive GUI would make it easier to manage. The user should be able to perform a real-time search of the objects and see the messages. As it is now, when we create an object, sometimes you find out at a later stage that the object already exists. If I could simply type an object into the search bar and find out whether it exists by seeing it in a dropdown then it would save me time.