The storage capacity of the product is an area that can be improved if it is made possible to increase it whenever you want. The features of the product are available without any payment, and I don't have any problem paying for some more features in the tool.
The solution is a bit complex and could be made easier to use. The solution should have an easier knowledge base. The solution should have basic-level certifications that encourage people to start using it because its certifications are lengthy.
Learn what your peers think about Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
The local sales team contact is not easily available. If I want to contact a sales account manager at Google directly to buy something, I cannot approach them directly. I have to go through layers of vendors. Only then can I somehow approach.
They should include case studies to learn about the use cases. It is a bit technical, and figuring out the proper use cases for our business is challenging. We would like to know the exact technical intricacies and its output regarding return on investment.
I think that the solution needs to be made available in a local region of every country, especially in countries like Taiwan. The solution to its users should provide more choices in terms of regions.
There are still many aspects I need to explore. However, there is room for improvement in terms of stability. Sometimes we face uncertainty when our internet connection gets disconnected. It becomes challenging to determine whether it's an issue with our internet or if the GCP SDP has crashed. We encounter such errors, but it's difficult to understand the cause. That's why I it is room for improvement, according to me. In future releases, I would like to see a free version available for students and for those logging in as intermediates or beginners.
There is room for improvement. For instance, we encountered some issues with a potential cluster on GCP last month. Although we use GCP for all our resources, we experienced some difficulties. So, I think this aspect needs to be addressed and improved upon. And from what I can tell, GCP is working on addressing this issue.
I think the solution has some issues in document accessing and accessing of some data at times when you have automated scripts. So, maybe that could be made better in the solution. Sometimes, it just fails to get some documents, and then it resumes normally. Google should work to enhance the overall features of the solution.
Senior Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-01-10T19:27:00Z
Jan 10, 2023
There is room for improvement in the tools and features available on the GCP. In particular, the managed databases and queues could be improved, and it would be beneficial to have more offerings in areas such as data science and data warehousing. Additionally, GCP could benefit from offering similar tools to those offered by its competitors, such as Amazon AWS's Redshift.
The Google Cloud UI has a lot of bugs, and they are working on enhancing it. There are a lot of things that need to be enhanced. For example, sometimes, the snapshot portal makes you have a schedule to create multiple snapshots when you have a huge infrastructure hosted on Google Cloud. Sometimes the browser or the UI hangs when looking for a specific snapshot. Also, Google Cloud support responds very quickly, but the UI still needs to have more enhancements related to the performance. The integration of the solution for patching, updating, and installing the updates could be better. For example, they have a solution called "always patching," which needs to be enhanced. It is not purely a SaaS solution. It should be mostly platform as a solution, not software.
Architecture and Solutions Specialist at a marketing services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-11-01T19:55:51Z
Nov 1, 2021
Apigee is a good feature because we analyzed and changed the computer-associated AP to Apigee. We compared the features and created the clusters to change the solution to Apigee. It's a good option on the Google Cloud Platform. And I like BigQuery, which is a fantastic database on the SaaS model. The hard part is creating the pack because our applications are in Azure Data Proxy, Data Fabric, and Data Factory. Our team used these tools in Azure, but in the future, they will transition to GCP.
Support Personale at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Reseller
2021-07-16T08:41:48Z
Jul 16, 2021
The support can be more efficient. Google has different layers of support, like layer one, layer two, and layer three, but normally, the response from layer one is not very useful. Google is not very capable when it comes to patching vulnerabilities. It would be nice if they could improve this security issue or CVE. The stability needs to be improved for some services.
Head of Practice at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2021-04-26T10:25:39Z
Apr 26, 2021
The product is great. I can't think of a way it can be improved. There aren't any missing features. It's quite complete. The solution could be more reasonably priced. We find it to be a bit expensive right now.
Staff Technical Program Manager at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-10-06T06:57:48Z
Oct 6, 2020
We have some challenges related to purging the data. We get a lot of data on a daily basis that has to be refreshed on the site, but we are seeing some challenges with that. They can also include some third-party integration. We have one Akamai dependency. If they can come up with some API to talk to Akamai, it would be good.
I think this product needs to shift the focus from our software, our solution, like social media analytics to our customers; not maintenance in the hardware. We focus on our business for the maintenance and infrastructure to develop the software.
SaaS Development Manager at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Real User
2020-03-16T06:56:15Z
Mar 16, 2020
We are looking for a more robust solution that allows seamless integration. The initial setup was quite complex. The solution needs some features. There a lot of new requirements, like seamless integration and real-time batch updates, that we would want that should be added in future releases.
I think that the documentation could be a bit better in terms of what is presented on the screen versus what actually happens. There's a little bit of confusion under your resource discovery you get in a search bar having to do with the level of complexity of the product design. But I think the documentation could be better.
I would like to see the drag and drop features improved. They have a lot of hand-coded coding. Now they are doing less coding and more drag and drop and configuration. From a developer's perspective, it would make it simpler and also the less manual coding will lead to fewer defects. Less coding ability but most coding should be automated using a drag and drop functionality. The setup could be more user-friendly. In the next release, I would like to see improved drag and drop features, less coding abilities, or zero coding abilities. This would mean that you can do it by using your configurations, or even when you drag and drop it can be an orchestration so that anyone can do it. It would not be just some hand-coded kind of development that will be used by developers in the future.
Google’s mission is to organize the world‘s information and make it universally accessible and useful.
Since our founding in 1998, Google has grown by leaps and bounds. From offering search in a single language we now offer dozens of products and services—including various forms of advertising and web applications for all kinds of tasks—in scores of languages. And starting from two computer science students in a university dorm room, we now have thousands of employees and offices around...
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy should improve stability.
People who don't have experience in IT may find the tool challenging. It needs to improve its pricing.
The storage capacity of the product is an area that can be improved if it is made possible to increase it whenever you want. The features of the product are available without any payment, and I don't have any problem paying for some more features in the tool.
The product must be more user-friendly. It should be provided in other languages, too.
The solution is a bit complex and could be made easier to use. The solution should have an easier knowledge base. The solution should have basic-level certifications that encourage people to start using it because its certifications are lengthy.
The platform’s stability and scalability need improvement.
The local sales team contact is not easily available. If I want to contact a sales account manager at Google directly to buy something, I cannot approach them directly. I have to go through layers of vendors. Only then can I somehow approach.
The solution's AI integration could be improved.
The solution's security should be improved.
The stability regarding voice commands in the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement.
They should include case studies to learn about the use cases. It is a bit technical, and figuring out the proper use cases for our business is challenging. We would like to know the exact technical intricacies and its output regarding return on investment.
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy could be more user-friendly and less expensive.
I think that the solution needs to be made available in a local region of every country, especially in countries like Taiwan. The solution to its users should provide more choices in terms of regions.
There are still many aspects I need to explore. However, there is room for improvement in terms of stability. Sometimes we face uncertainty when our internet connection gets disconnected. It becomes challenging to determine whether it's an issue with our internet or if the GCP SDP has crashed. We encounter such errors, but it's difficult to understand the cause. That's why I it is room for improvement, according to me. In future releases, I would like to see a free version available for students and for those logging in as intermediates or beginners.
There is room for improvement. For instance, we encountered some issues with a potential cluster on GCP last month. Although we use GCP for all our resources, we experienced some difficulties. So, I think this aspect needs to be addressed and improved upon. And from what I can tell, GCP is working on addressing this issue.
I think the solution has some issues in document accessing and accessing of some data at times when you have automated scripts. So, maybe that could be made better in the solution. Sometimes, it just fails to get some documents, and then it resumes normally. Google should work to enhance the overall features of the solution.
The cost of licenses could be better.
There is room for improvement in the tools and features available on the GCP. In particular, the managed databases and queues could be improved, and it would be beneficial to have more offerings in areas such as data science and data warehousing. Additionally, GCP could benefit from offering similar tools to those offered by its competitors, such as Amazon AWS's Redshift.
The Google Cloud UI has a lot of bugs, and they are working on enhancing it. There are a lot of things that need to be enhanced. For example, sometimes, the snapshot portal makes you have a schedule to create multiple snapshots when you have a huge infrastructure hosted on Google Cloud. Sometimes the browser or the UI hangs when looking for a specific snapshot. Also, Google Cloud support responds very quickly, but the UI still needs to have more enhancements related to the performance. The integration of the solution for patching, updating, and installing the updates could be better. For example, they have a solution called "always patching," which needs to be enhanced. It is not purely a SaaS solution. It should be mostly platform as a solution, not software.
Apigee is a good feature because we analyzed and changed the computer-associated AP to Apigee. We compared the features and created the clusters to change the solution to Apigee. It's a good option on the Google Cloud Platform. And I like BigQuery, which is a fantastic database on the SaaS model. The hard part is creating the pack because our applications are in Azure Data Proxy, Data Fabric, and Data Factory. Our team used these tools in Azure, but in the future, they will transition to GCP.
The solution should have better integration.
The support can be more efficient. Google has different layers of support, like layer one, layer two, and layer three, but normally, the response from layer one is not very useful. Google is not very capable when it comes to patching vulnerabilities. It would be nice if they could improve this security issue or CVE. The stability needs to be improved for some services.
The product is great. I can't think of a way it can be improved. There aren't any missing features. It's quite complete. The solution could be more reasonably priced. We find it to be a bit expensive right now.
We have some challenges related to purging the data. We get a lot of data on a daily basis that has to be refreshed on the site, but we are seeing some challenges with that. They can also include some third-party integration. We have one Akamai dependency. If they can come up with some API to talk to Akamai, it would be good.
I think this product needs to shift the focus from our software, our solution, like social media analytics to our customers; not maintenance in the hardware. We focus on our business for the maintenance and infrastructure to develop the software.
We are looking for a more robust solution that allows seamless integration. The initial setup was quite complex. The solution needs some features. There a lot of new requirements, like seamless integration and real-time batch updates, that we would want that should be added in future releases.
I think that the documentation could be a bit better in terms of what is presented on the screen versus what actually happens. There's a little bit of confusion under your resource discovery you get in a search bar having to do with the level of complexity of the product design. But I think the documentation could be better.
I would like to see the drag and drop features improved. They have a lot of hand-coded coding. Now they are doing less coding and more drag and drop and configuration. From a developer's perspective, it would make it simpler and also the less manual coding will lead to fewer defects. Less coding ability but most coding should be automated using a drag and drop functionality. The setup could be more user-friendly. In the next release, I would like to see improved drag and drop features, less coding abilities, or zero coding abilities. This would mean that you can do it by using your configurations, or even when you drag and drop it can be an orchestration so that anyone can do it. It would not be just some hand-coded kind of development that will be used by developers in the future.