Presales Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Reseller
Top 20
2024-10-15T06:36:00Z
Oct 15, 2024
The dependency on Jamf Pro or SIEM or SOAR for some automations and integrations could be reduced. In-built automation and remediation of behavior-based threats would be beneficial enhancements.
The tool's drawback is that it fails to offer support for Linux. The XDR and licensing parts of the tool are also areas of concern where improvements are required. XDR is for extensive detection and range of response. Jamf relies on signature-based access. If it is a known signature that just protects our devices, it is a kind of threat isolation. The tool does have behavioral analysis, but as the severity becomes less, the system gets loaded. It is not the same with CrowdStrike as it has a variety of strategies and is a fully cloud-native tool, which helps it to make sure it is a leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant. CrowdStrike goes with its set of practicalities. The kind of threat intelligence CrowdStrike follows is really expensive. With CrowdStrike, we can see which factors have been targeted in our organization. If we know our enemy, then it becomes so easy to cover up with the defense mechanism. The features in CrowdStrike get lagged when used with Jamf Protect. With Jamf Protect, there is a need to improve the security it offers.
The solution’s stability could be improved. We need to regularly update the security patches for malware protection and threat protection. Jamf Protect should be integrated with third-party malware solutions or threat protection services.
The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required. It would be good if Jamf Protect could be integrated with Jamf Pro and used as a single solution. There are a couple of improvements where there is a need to change a few things. There are also a couple of things that need to be removed and merged into the main tool, Jamf Pro. The solution's technical team needs to improve because somewhere I felt from my personal experience that unless Jamf's team puts in an effort to understand the requirements of its customers, help can't be provided. The help provided by Jamf's team is on the basis of what they know, so I feel that they need to put a bit of effort into understanding what customers expect from the product.
I'd really like to see some data loss prevention (DLP) capabilities. More visibility into user activity on laptops would be helpful. For example, knowing if someone took a screenshot is good, but knowing what was captured in the screenshot would be even better. I'd definitely provide feedback on adding such features.
Jamf Protect provides comprehensive security for Apple devices, aiding in malware protection, threat prevention, CIS benchmarks, and USB blockages while supporting local accounts and password sync.Designed for managing Apple devices, Jamf Protect offers robust security features, such as malware detection and prevention, unauthorized data transfer blocks, and enhanced security profiles. It allows seamless deployment and upgrades of applications, coupled with efficient endpoint management. The...
The dependency on Jamf Pro or SIEM or SOAR for some automations and integrations could be reduced. In-built automation and remediation of behavior-based threats would be beneficial enhancements.
The tool's drawback is that it fails to offer support for Linux. The XDR and licensing parts of the tool are also areas of concern where improvements are required. XDR is for extensive detection and range of response. Jamf relies on signature-based access. If it is a known signature that just protects our devices, it is a kind of threat isolation. The tool does have behavioral analysis, but as the severity becomes less, the system gets loaded. It is not the same with CrowdStrike as it has a variety of strategies and is a fully cloud-native tool, which helps it to make sure it is a leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant. CrowdStrike goes with its set of practicalities. The kind of threat intelligence CrowdStrike follows is really expensive. With CrowdStrike, we can see which factors have been targeted in our organization. If we know our enemy, then it becomes so easy to cover up with the defense mechanism. The features in CrowdStrike get lagged when used with Jamf Protect. With Jamf Protect, there is a need to improve the security it offers.
Beginners need initial training and have basic/essential knowledge.
The solution’s stability could be improved. We need to regularly update the security patches for malware protection and threat protection. Jamf Protect should be integrated with third-party malware solutions or threat protection services.
The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required. It would be good if Jamf Protect could be integrated with Jamf Pro and used as a single solution. There are a couple of improvements where there is a need to change a few things. There are also a couple of things that need to be removed and merged into the main tool, Jamf Pro. The solution's technical team needs to improve because somewhere I felt from my personal experience that unless Jamf's team puts in an effort to understand the requirements of its customers, help can't be provided. The help provided by Jamf's team is on the basis of what they know, so I feel that they need to put a bit of effort into understanding what customers expect from the product.
Jamf Protect protects just Mac devices, and we would love to have one solution for other platforms and not just Mac devices.
I'd really like to see some data loss prevention (DLP) capabilities. More visibility into user activity on laptops would be helpful. For example, knowing if someone took a screenshot is good, but knowing what was captured in the screenshot would be even better. I'd definitely provide feedback on adding such features.
The solution's integration with other tools is slow.
Jamf Protect needs to improve its pricing.