When evaluating User Provisioning Software, look for features that enhance security, efficiency, and integration. These include:
Automated user account creation and deactivation
Role-based access control
Delegated administration capabilities
Integration with existing systems
Audit and compliance reporting
Automated user account creation and deactivation streamline processes, reducing manual errors. Role-based access control ensures that users have appropriate access, minimizing security risks. Delegated administration capabilities allow decentralized management, providing flexibility for different departments to manage their user permissions independently. These features enhance the overall efficiency and security of user management.
Integration with existing systems is crucial for seamless operation, enabling User Provisioning Software to work alongside other applications without disruption. Audit and compliance reporting are essential for tracking user activity and ensuring adherence to regulations. This not only helps in maintaining security standards but also supports the organization in remaining compliant with industry-specific requirements. Together, these features ensure robust, secure, and efficient user management.
Search for a product comparison in User Provisioning Software
Enterprise Solutions & Services Head at Duroob Technology
Real User
2021-10-20T03:06:15Z
Oct 20, 2021
You need to have a proper vision of Identity & governance with you. Now generally you have two approaches either you execute the Role mining processes across various directories map with Roles & Responsibilities along with segregated duties among departments.
Or you take a non-traditional approach to grasp the major directories: start with self-reset, enrollment, provisioning de-provisioning, the elevation of provisions through a workflow process and go for least provision to most common directories that associate with all employees.
This is what I generally recommend to my customers: a pyramid approach - from top to bottom. So geared up and equipped with your most problematic issues against identities and reduce the risk against automation and then for the first process which I explained earlier.
In my experience, this approach will bring quick. Otherwise, some projects end up a software "in a desert", without any results in IAM projects.
The first is the ability to cover many integrations and heterogeneous platforms (clouds, databases, web services, iSeries, mainframe, proprietary applications etc.), secondly the ease to create the integrations with the least effort and third the capacity to adapt the provisioning flow to involve business rules, SoD and identity governance processes
User Provisioning Software is a category of software solutions that automate the process of granting and managing user access to various systems and applications within an organization.
When evaluating User Provisioning Software, look for features that enhance security, efficiency, and integration. These include:
Automated user account creation and deactivation streamline processes, reducing manual errors. Role-based access control ensures that users have appropriate access, minimizing security risks. Delegated administration capabilities allow decentralized management, providing flexibility for different departments to manage their user permissions independently. These features enhance the overall efficiency and security of user management.
Integration with existing systems is crucial for seamless operation, enabling User Provisioning Software to work alongside other applications without disruption. Audit and compliance reporting are essential for tracking user activity and ensuring adherence to regulations. This not only helps in maintaining security standards but also supports the organization in remaining compliant with industry-specific requirements. Together, these features ensure robust, secure, and efficient user management.
You need to have a proper vision of Identity & governance with you. Now generally you have two approaches either you execute the Role mining processes across various directories map with Roles & Responsibilities along with segregated duties among departments.
Or you take a non-traditional approach to grasp the major directories: start with self-reset, enrollment, provisioning de-provisioning, the elevation of provisions through a workflow process and go for least provision to most common directories that associate with all employees.
This is what I generally recommend to my customers: a pyramid approach - from top to bottom. So geared up and equipped with your most problematic issues against identities and reduce the risk against automation and then for the first process which I explained earlier.
In my experience, this approach will bring quick. Otherwise, some projects end up a software "in a desert", without any results in IAM projects.
The first is the ability to cover many integrations and heterogeneous platforms (clouds, databases, web services, iSeries, mainframe, proprietary applications etc.), secondly the ease to create the integrations with the least effort and third the capacity to adapt the provisioning flow to involve business rules, SoD and identity governance processes
Shop system. Order and approval processes.
Automation, audit trails and approvals, shared responsibilities across departments, open API for integration.
Diminution du risque et simplicité d'accès.
Reduce Administrative overhead
Reducing risk
Shift responsibility to the correct place (account owner / platform owner)