Akamai CloudTest Reviews

Name: Akamai CloudTest
Brand: Akamai
Rating: 4 (7 reviews)

3.8 out of 5

7 reviews
85% willing to recommend

1,701 followers

What is Akamai CloudTest?

Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

Get the Akamai CloudTest Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest, Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional and more!

Akamai CloudTest is the #15 ranked solution in top Performance Testing Tools and #17 ranked solution in top Load Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give Akamai CloudTest an average rating of 7.6 out of 10. Akamai CloudTest is most commonly compared to Apache JMeter: Akamai CloudTest vs Apache JMeter. Akamai CloudTest is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 80% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 25% of all views.

Helped 801,394 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at Publicis Sapient

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at Publicis Sapient

In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load. CI/CD integration, the pipeline itself, still needs to be improved. Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization. This is because you need multiple servers in order to generate heavy loads. Other solutions like Gatling take much lower resources compared to that by Akamai CloudTest. For instance, you would need three different instances of typical 8-core 16 GB to generate 2000 concurrent users from Akamai CloudTest, but you would need half of the capacity with Gatling.

Read full review

Rajbir Singh

Director - DevOps and Infrastructure at INTIGRAL

Our primary use case is to do performance testing and load testing to determine which applications we release on the market to end-users. Before they go to the production environment, we perform a couple of tests to determine the threshold or maximum capacity our backend can handle. So we look at…

Read full review

Akamai CloudTest mindshare

Product category:

As of September 2024, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest in the Performance Testing Tools category stands at 1.8%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Key learnings from peers

Last updated Sep 3, 2024

Valuable Features

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."
"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."
"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

Room for Improvement

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."
"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."
"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

Pricing

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."
"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."
"Running cost is very low."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Akamai CloudTest Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.