Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akamai and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #13, while OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.5. Akamai holds a 3.0% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

1,529 Views
1,238 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Performance E...

Read 47 OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) reviews

5,940 Views
4,514 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

OpenText Core Performance E...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Akamai CloudTest and OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) compete in performance testing and load engineering. Akamai is known for scalability, whereas OpenText stands out with its advanced analytics.

Features: Akamai CloudTest supports real-time load testing, easy integration with cloud services, and customizable dashboards. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud excels in providing detailed performance analytics, scalable cloud-based testing, and comprehensive protocol support.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could enhance its customer service and expand analytic features. Improvement in deployment flexibility and pricing models might be beneficial. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud could improve network discrepancy management, streamline issue detection, and enhance custom reporting features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers straightforward deployment and excellent customer support, making setup efficient and seamless. Akamai CloudTest provides streamlined cloud deployments but may benefit from richer customer support services.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest delivers competitive pricing aligned with its scalability focus, offering good ROI. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, though potentially higher in cost, provides justifiable ROI through its detailed insights and long-term benefits for businesses focusing on data analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,117 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Core Performance E...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

4th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 3.0%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is 7.8%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)	7.8%
Akamai CloudTest	3.0%
Other	89.2%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

Mahendra Andhale

Test Manager at Happiest Minds Technologies

Centralized cloud testing has improved global load generation and real-time performance insights

The most valuable features I have found in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) are that everything is online and centralized, so I do not need to go anywhere to check the configuration and everything. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)'s advanced analytics help identify performance bottlenecks because whenever we are executing the test scripts, it shows a good analytics view where we can simply check which APIs are not performing well. The cloud-based load generators in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) have benefited my testing setup because we can generate the load across the globe, which was previously a little bit difficult on the on-premises version. The user interface in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) is intuitive and this will be easy to communicate and collaborate amongst the team also because sharing the online URL with the team, they can simply check the analysis and everything.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest."

"Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"The agents on the cloud have been extremely valuable for us."

"Customer service is great; quick to act on everything."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"The solution was easy to set-up and much more easy and intuitive to build performance tests."

More Akamai CloudTest pros

"OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines."

"I would rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud a ten out of ten for scalability."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to configure browser settings for different operating systems and on different versions without the need to install every single version on each machine and to manage them."

"The most valuable feature is having load generators in countries where we don’t have access to them."

"Before LoadRunner, we weren't even testing performance and now we're performance testing."

"The most valuable features I have found in OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) are that everything is online and centralized, so I do not need to go anywhere to check the configuration and everything."

"Both the professional and cloud versions of Micro Focus LoadRunner use the same scripting or programming to execute performance modeling operations. This feature allows users to use various programming languages such as Java, C, or C++, which can run within either of the two environments. This flexibility in the programming language is a strong point of the software."

"The most useful features of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud include getting load through the Performance Center, which is part of the cloud version, where we can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pros

Cons

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"Out of five, I would rate the technical support of the solution at two or three. Sometimes it's a challenge because we face delays."

"I couldn't say, as I haven't used it outside the training or applied it to any project yet."

"The UI gets stuck sometimes; pulling huge load test data takes time and the UI often gets stuck."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"Resource consumption also needs to be worked on. When we generate a thousand or two thousand concurrent users, we need to optimize the load generator resource utilization."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support."

More Akamai CloudTest cons

"Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud."

"An area for improvement is analytics on why response times are slow from certain countries."

"Its scripting features need improvement."

"Custom load patterns for the performance tests: Currently StormRunner Load supports only linear ramp up of the user load and doesn’t provide the user load to follow a step incremental load pattern or any other pattern that a performance tester wants to."

"Because it is a paid tool, its cost is very high."

"There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other."

"I'd like to see more ability to dive more deeply into the configuration."

"I don't like their reporting."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"Running cost is very low."

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"The solution is expensive."

"LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."

"The pricing for OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is average."

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,117 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Retailer

10%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	30

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows it is very high and very costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) can be improved by incorporating code improvements. I would add that it reduces the initial setup complexity, improves the learning curve op...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 22% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 10% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 5% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 10% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

October 2026

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

September 2026

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report

Download OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

Overview

Akamai CloudTest provides a robust platform for simulating real-world traffic scenarios, allowing businesses to optimize application performance and reliability.

Akamai CloudTest is designed for high-scale load testing, enabling companies to simulate thousands to millions of users in realistic environments. It delivers accurate performance insights, ensuring applications handle peak demands. With its real-time analytics, teams can make informed decisions to improve app reliability and user experience.

What are the key features of Akamai CloudTest?

Real-Time Analytics: Provides immediate insights into performance metrics during tests.
Scalability: Simulates a range of user loads from thousands to millions.
Cloud Integration: Utilizes cloud resources for flexible and extensive testing.
Customizable Test Scenarios: Allows tailored load tests to reflect real-world conditions.
Integrated Monitoring: Offers comprehensive monitoring of application performance during load tests.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Improved Performance: Identifies performance bottlenecks swiftly, enhancing application speed and reliability.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation by preventing over-provisioning.
Informed Decisions: Empowers teams to make data-driven decisions based on real-time insights.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes application downtime through proactive testing and analysis.

In industries like finance, retail, and media, Akamai CloudTest is often implemented to ensure transaction-heavy environments remain stable under peak loads. Retailers use it during sales events to guarantee seamless user experiences, while media companies benefit during high-traffic streaming events.

Akamai

OpenText Core Performance Engineering offers scalable and efficient load testing using a cloud-based architecture, eliminating the need for physical infrastructure and supporting a wide range of users and testing scenarios.

OpenText Core Performance Engineering supports seamless integration with popular tools and delivers real-time anomaly detection and performance insights. With an intuitive interface, it supports scripting protocols and provides tests for cloud-hosted and on-premise applications. The platform streamlines performance testing and infrastructure management, addressing the needs of diverse sectors like banking, retail, and IT. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, integration, documentation, and support for older scripts.

What are the key features?

Rapid Test Setup: Quickly initiate performance tests without extensive configuration efforts.
Scalability: Supports numerous users without loss of performance across global regions.
Global Load Distribution: Allows effective load distribution across different geographies.
Seamless Tool Integration: Integrates smoothly with SiteScope, New Relic, and others.
Real-time Anomaly Detection: Instantly identifies performance anomalies for immediate action.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Minimal Infrastructure Management: Reduces the need for physical resources, saving costs and effort.
Enhanced Application Responsiveness: Ensures applications remain stable under peak loads.
Increased Testing Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes for faster execution.
Cloud-Based Flexibility: Offers dynamic resource allocation to accommodate varying test needs.
Comprehensive Performance Insights: Delivers valuable analytics for optimizing applications.

Organizations in banking, retail, and IT sectors implement OpenText Core Performance Engineering for performance testing, integrating it within CI/CD pipelines. It suits public server application testing and enterprise systems like SAP and Salesforce, meeting diverse industry demands for app stability and responsiveness testing.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

September 2026

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud)

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,117 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.