Akamai CloudTest vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud comparison

Akamai and OpenText are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1. Akamai holds a 2.6% mindshare in PTT, compared to OpenText’s 8.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

488 Views
343 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Read 44 OpenText LoadRunner Cloud reviews

2,809 Views
1,625 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud are competitors in the load testing market. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud holds the advantage due to its comprehensive feature set, despite Akamai CloudTest's favorable pricing and support.

Features: Akamai CloudTest is known for real-time analytics, detailed performance insights, and flexible testing options. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers advanced integration capabilities, scalable user load handling, and diverse protocol support, making it a preferred choice for feature-rich testing environments.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could enhance its integration options, provide more comprehensive scalability, and improve its user interface for better usability. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud may benefit from better customer support, a streamlined deployment process, and simplified pricing structures to attract smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest provides easy deployment and robust support, making it appealing for users seeking straightforward solutions. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud boasts efficient cloud integration, though its customer service could be improved for enhanced user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest is a cost-effective option with favorable ROI for smaller enterprises. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud justifies its higher cost through extensive features and efficient testing capacities, offering significant ROI for large-scale operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

9th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

6th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 2.6%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is 8.8%, down from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at Publicis Sapient

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

AlexLogan

Senior Manager, Performance Engineering at Enel Group

Has realistic scenario composition for performance tests and is highly scalable, but the user interface needs improvement

The solution generates traffic on the infrastructure, which resembles end users. Depending on the performance of the underlying infrastructure and nodes of the architecture, our company team can report on the scalability of applications. The solution performs two types of tests: user interface testing, which is implemented primarily in our organization for online banking, and the other one is API level testing for mobile banking. In terms of the feature set, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is a market-leading application that has been around for 20 years. I have been working with the solution throughout the acquisition stages; the product used to be much better when it was primarily managed by Mercury. There are limited AI capabilities in the solution; when I was personally operating some smart scenarios using the feature of auto-scaling, I found it unsatisfying. I would recommend the product to others based on its feature set and the level of support. I would rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud as seven out of ten. There are no glaring weaknesses in the product, and it's good enough for its core purpose.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"The solution is very stable."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"The product’s most valuable feature is the Vuser license; it allows us to reduce the cost as per requirement."

"The reports are very relevant to the customers’ expectations."

"The solution can scale."

"The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it."

"The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way."

"This solution is SaaS based so we can utilize cloud technology, which is less time consuming and saves a lot of of money."

"The TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it's part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and HTML. So many other tools do not recognize this specific proprietary protocol. Using TruClient, we can still create scripts that cover everything that we need to cover."

"OpenText LoadRunner Cloud eliminates the need for our own testing infrastructure when running tests."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pros

Cons

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"The analysis feature in OpenText LoadRunner Cloud requires improvement. In-depth analysis tools found in the standalone LoadRunner analysis, such as graph merging and setting granularity, would be beneficial."

"The initial setup is complex, but that is the nature of the technology."

"I'd like to see more ability to dive more deeply into the configuration."

"We encounter hurdles while running the professional version for on-premise setup."

"Their documentation is not technical enough for us. We would like to have much deeper technical documentation so that we can self-serve without constantly having to go back to them and ask."

"We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around how you can containerize applications. There are some limitations to some protocols, such as desktop. And when it comes to database testing, there are some things that we can't do through CI/CD."

"One area of improvement in the software's support is the replaying of captured data within the development environment. It would be beneficial if the replay feature could accurately mimic what the actual application is doing for better analysis and testing."

"There is a steep learning curve for the product, too."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"Running cost is very low."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"LoadRunner always had expensive pricing. At my company, we used to evaluate LoadRunner, but we stuck with Silk Performer because its pricing was always better in the past. I do feel that I got a fair deal this time. Our value-added reseller and our sales guy worked hard to give us a fair deal. I feel that we got a fair deal. We did not go for the pay-as-you-go deal. I did an upfront package. I prefer that. I want to know what my costs are."

"The pricing for OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is average."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I would prefer it to be cheaper. On a scale of one to ten, the price is a five. It's delivering functionality, but we also use JMeter ( /products/apache-jmeter-reviews ), which is free.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 36% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 15% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 15% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 27% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 25% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

May 2025

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

April 2025

Download OpenText LoadRunner Cloud product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

Overview

Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

Akamai

Do your performance and load testing in the cloud. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud makes it easy to plan, run, and scale performance tests without the need to deploy and manage infrastructure.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.