Azure Stack Reviews

Azure Stack provides improved fleet utilization and cost-effectiveness. Mining organizations increased utilization from forty percent to eighty percent. Other clouds are often more expensive; Azure Stack offers a user-friendly and cost-effective option. ROI varies by customer, generally positive by the second year. Small companies experience initial positive ROI within a month, with monthly costs more manageable. Larger businesses benefit from scaling, achieving higher ROI associated with increased user bases.

Azure Stack pricing is viewed as reasonable yet expensive in comparison to other solutions like AWS or Google Cloud. Licensing is flexible with pay-as-you-go models and subscription options, though regional pricing variations add complexity. Users appreciate the licensing model for avoiding upfront costs, but maintenance and support fees add to expenses. Costs depend on usage, with prices starting at $6 per vCPU for Linux VMs monthly. Users find value but note the high pricing, particularly for specific services.

• "Azure Stack is a very expensive solution."
• "The people who manage the budgets are satisfied with the solution’s medium pricing, which is neither very expensive nor very cheap."
• "I am using my Microsoft license, and it costs monthly. You need to pay additional costs apart from the standard costs."

Organizations primarily use Azure Stack for hybrid cloud services, offering capabilities like IoT, DevOps, storage, and analytics. They deploy it within data centers to extend Microsoft Azure services, support app hosting, manage infrastructure, and handle data localization. It is utilized for running virtual machines, security, analytics, app development, device management, and migrations. Companies also leverage Azure Stack for regulatory compliance, billing, and as a comprehensive platform for various business processes.

Many users find Azure Stack's customer support satisfactory, with quick and responsive assistance. However, experiences vary based on subscription level, with some expressing dissatisfaction with response time and knowledge. Issues with communication and coordination occasionally arise during problem resolution. Larger enterprises often report better experiences, while smaller companies might struggle with prompt support. Access to knowledgeable engineers and the ability to swiftly address queries are appreciated, although room for improvement exists in response times.

Azure Stack's initial setup is generally described as straightforward by many users. Some find it easy due to pre-integrated systems, while others note complexities, particularly with multiple users or specific configurations. A few users needed assistance from partners or relied on documentation for challenges like networking. Experiences vary, with deployment times ranging from a few hours to weeks, depending on requirements and expertise. Users frequently compare its ease to other platforms like AWS, with mixed reviews.

Azure Stack demonstrates strong scalability, supporting both small and large user bases efficiently. Users report easy expansion, with flexibility in virtual environments. Although it rivals AWS and Google Cloud in some areas, its scalability might be hindered by regional availability. Users appreciate features like on-demand resources and automated management. Some mention room for improvement in administrative aspects. Despite minor limitations, Azure Stack is rated highly for scalability by most users.

Azure Stack is generally stable with high ratings from users. Most users rate its stability between eight and nine out of ten, noting it as reliable, particularly in a cloud environment. While some minor bugs and service interruptions exist, Microsoft support is often helpful. Users highlight the importance of proper infrastructure management for optimal stability. Despite occasional issues, Azure Stack is viewed positively, particularly for heavy workloads and complex scenarios.