Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Defense Orchestrator Logo

Cisco Defense Orchestrator Reviews

Vendor: Cisco
4.1 out of 5

What is Cisco Defense Orchestrator?

Featured Cisco Defense Orchestrator reviews

Cisco Defense Orchestrator mindshare

As of March 2025, the mindshare of Cisco Defense Orchestrator in the Firewall Security Management category stands at 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewall Security Management

PeerAnalyst reports based on Cisco Defense Orchestrator reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryFirewall Security ManagementMar 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Defense Orchestrator vs AlgoSecMar 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Defense Orchestrator vs Tufin Orchestration SuiteMar 29, 2025Download
ComparisonCisco Defense Orchestrator vs Palo Alto Networks PanoramaMar 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
AlgoSec4.522.3%96%183 interviewsAdd to research
Tufin Orchestration Suite4.022.0%91%183 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
51%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Legal Firm
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Government
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Retailer
3%
Construction Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Healthcare Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
University
1%
Comms Service Provider
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Museum Or Institution
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Insurance Company
1%
 

Cisco Defense Orchestrator reviews

Sort by:
TE
CTO at SECURE NETWORKERS LLC
Verified user of Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Jul 24, 2019
Provides visibility into entire infrastructure and bulk changes save time and resources

Pros

"There are a lot of templates that are already built-in. They give you quick-to-create and quick-to-apply policies that are typically a little more complicated for people."

Cons

"We had some MX devices that were blocking Windows Update from happening. We found out it was a Meraki issue, but it would have been nice if it had been flagged for us: "Hey, these updates are failing because the MX is blocking it." It wasn't a huge problem, but there was a loss of our time as well as the fact that the updates didn't get pushed out... It would have been nice if CDO had let us know that that was an issue."
FS
Security Engineer at Metrobank
Verified user of Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Feb 17, 2025
Automation reduces intervention and speeds up threat prevention

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the automation, as it reduces user intervention and allows us to focus on other tasks. "

Cons

"Cisco Defense Orchestrator should be made more user-friendly overall."
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Defense Orchestrator. Updated March 2025
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JM
Network and Security Specialist at CONNECTED TECHNOLOGY
Verified user of Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Jan 7, 2020
Restore history automatically prevents system crashes, but reporting and monitoring need work

Pros

"We use a lot of image upgrades. We take some 20 devices and then we update everything at once, including the policies. We apply policies for groups. For certain groups, like anti-viruses, we send out policies and apply them to every single device. It's really easy and simple."

Cons

"CDO doesn't have a report, an official report that I can check daily. It has another module called FTD, but it doesn't have that specifically for ASA. In the reporting, there are a lot of things that aren't there. There is also room for improvement in the daily monitoring."
DK
Network Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Aug 14, 2019
If a firewall goes down, we can pull the latest configuration and get it back up quickly

Pros

"If we have a firewall go down, I can hop into CDO, pull the latest configuration off and apply it. That's really good. It helps save time. "

Cons

"I'd like CDO to be the one-stop-shop where we could do all the configurations easily. It would be nice, for ASA upgrades, if we could do them from a central repository and not have to reach out to Cisco. That would be a definite plus."
PeerSpot user
Systems Architect at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Jul 26, 2019
Makes it easier to manage firewalls, even for those without much experience

Pros

"The ability to do operations on multiple firewalls at once is valuable because it saves time and mental effort. The solution's ability to make bulk changes makes it very convenient to manage things at once on multiple targets."

Cons

"I've found dozens of bugs over the year we've been using it. The more I use it for different things, the more problems I find... Most of the problems have to do with the user interface. A lot of thought and work has gone into the back-end component to make the product do what it's intended to do, but the way it is presented for use hasn't gotten nearly as much thought to make it smart and bug-free."
HK
Sr. Network Engineer at Vocera
Verified user of Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Aug 13, 2019
Upgrade feature is valuable to me because I have dual ASAs

Pros

"I like the upgrade feature. That is pretty valuable to me because I have dual ASAs and when I go through CDO it does it for me pretty well. It's all done in the back-end and I don't really have to be involved. I just initiate, pick the image, and I pick when I want it done and it just does it, whether I have a single ASA or have a dual ASA."

Cons

"The main thing that would useful for us would the logging and monitoring. I have to check it out, to get the beta, because I don't have access to them... I wanted CDO to be a central place so where I could do everything but right now I don't think that's possible. I really don't want to go back and forth between this and FMC. Maybe the logging portion, when I look at it, will give me some similarities."
PeerSpot user
Network and Data Centre Platform Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Verified user of Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Jul 26, 2019
Helps us identify shadow rules and duplicated objects which aren't being used

Pros

"The most valuable feature is being able to do centralized upgrades on the ASAs. We can select all of those ASAs, and say, "Upgrade these ASAs at this scheduled time." It will copy down the ASA image, ASDM image, and then do the upgrade and failovers, and then put it all back into service as required at a scheduled time. It automates that process for us."

Cons

"There could be some slight improvements to navigation. In some of the navigation you've got to go back to be able to get into where you need to be once you've made a change. If I make a change, I've then got to go back to submit and send the change."
PeerSpot user
Network Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Aug 14, 2019
The rule usage is a nice feature, but we have problems with it staying in sync when logging into the device

Pros

"The initial setup was straightforward. We spun up the VM onsite. We generated the key that it needed to talk to the Cloud Orchestrator. After that, as I started adding devices, it was relatively quick and easy."

Cons

"When logging into the device, we sort of had problems with it staying in sync. If somebody made a change onsite, it wouldn't do an automatic sync. It would have to wait, as you would have to do a manual sync up."