Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Defense Orchestrator vs Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Cisco Defense Orchestrator's support is responsive with quick resolutions and values customer feedback for continuous product development improvements.
Sentiment score
6.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center support is rated well, but experiences vary due to regional barriers, response times, and documentation quality.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Cisco Defense Orchestrator users want improved navigation, reporting, integrations, customization, and usability for better configuration management and deployment.
Sentiment score
5.1
Cisco Secure Firewall needs enhanced interface, performance, integration, cost management, API support, policy simplification, and AI-driven analytics.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Cisco Defense Orchestrator efficiently scales for various network sizes and users, supporting over 30 firewalls with ongoing improvements.
Sentiment score
8.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is highly scalable, supporting varied user bases with flexible license expansion and generally high satisfaction.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Cisco Defense Orchestrator pricing varies by device size, configuration, and licensing, offering integration benefits for Cisco environments.
Sentiment score
8.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center offers flexible, customizable licensing with individual feature fees, leading to variable and sometimes high costs.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Users appreciate Cisco Defense Orchestrator's stability, frequent updates, and smooth connectivity, despite dependence on the Cisco cloud.
Sentiment score
7.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is stable, with minor issues resolved by updates and effective Cisco support, ensuring reliability.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Cisco Defense Orchestrator simplifies network management with centralized control, security features, and insightful tools for enhanced device management.
Sentiment score
7.8
Cisco Secure Firewall excels in intrusion prevention, scalability, and integration, offering centralized management and comprehensive security features.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Secure Firewall Manag...
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of Cisco Defense Orchestrator is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewall Security Management
 

Featured Reviews

Vivek Balaji - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful guides, excellent support, integration could improve
Cisco Defense Orchestrator has useful guides for the steps that need to follow by users Cisco Defense Orchestrator can improve by providing more support for third-party security components. I have been using Cisco Defense Orchestrator for approximately eight months. The Cisco Defense…
Awais Ejaz - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and reasonably priced product that protects organizations from malware
The product must improve its performance. When we push policies from the console, it takes a lot of time. It takes five to seven minutes to push one policy. If someone pushes a wrong policy and there is an outage in the banking system, they would have to wait six to seven minutes to revert it. We have highlighted this issue to Cisco. A year ago, we told Cisco that we need APIs for integration with SOAR for pushing policies. We cannot push policies or run playbooks from SOAR to block any IOCs on the web and email gateway because Cisco doesn’t expose the APIs. It is one thing for which we have been following up with Cisco for the last year, but I don't think they've developed the API integration. Palo Alto and Fortinet provide this feature to their users.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
48%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
4%
Government
18%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Engineering Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center?
The platform has significantly enhanced our organization's operations by providing secure communication channels between different office locations.
What needs improvement with Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center?
We encountered challenges, particularly when building use cases for this firewall, as it requires specific OS versions and firmware upgrades, which can lead to increased downtime. It adds an admini...
 

Also Known As

CDO
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Insurance Company of British Columbia, Shawmut
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Defense Orchestrator vs. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.