Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama comparison

Cisco and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Cisco is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 0.8% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 9.3% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
Cisco Secure Firewall Manag...
Read 25 Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center reviews
  • 509 Views
  • 191 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Read 86 Palo Alto Networks Panorama reviews
  • 5,369 Views
  • 2,488 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center compete in centralized firewall management. Users appreciate Panorama for its pricing and support, while Cisco's features make it compelling for those who value robust capabilities and comprehensive functionality.

Features: Palo Alto Networks Panorama is known for centralized management, scalability, and ease of use, with strong automation capabilities and robust reporting features. The automation and credential theft prevention make it notable, as is the ability to seamlessly manage multiple firewalls. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is recognized for all-in-one firewall protection and centralized management critical for large network infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: Panorama users indicate room for improvement in pricing and complexity of managing multiple firewalls. Its documentation and integration with third-party products also need enhancement. Cisco users suggest improvements in user interface simplicity and cost, with some indicating performance issues tied to complex setups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Panorama supports deployment models including hybrid cloud and on-premises and is praised for its versatile deployment options. Cisco Secure Firewall supports on-premises and private cloud deployments, with robust support noted despite occasional response delays for both.

Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto Networks Panorama is perceived as expensive yet offers strong ROI due to its extensive feature set and efficiency. Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center's cost is similar, with charges for additional features but offers flexible licensing for diverse user needs. Both provide potential ROI through increased productivity and centralized management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report (Updated: October 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama
October 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.0
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center support is rated well, but experiences vary due to regional barriers, response times, and documentation quality.
Sentiment score
6.2
Palo Alto Networks Panorama's customer service is knowledgeable and effective, though improvements are needed in speed, consistency, and pricing.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center report
The tech support I've encountered has been good, prompt, and fast.
For more quotes and insights, download the Palo Alto Networks Panorama report
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.1
Cisco Secure Firewall needs enhanced interface, performance, integration, cost management, API support, policy simplification, and AI-driven analytics.
Sentiment score
4.4
Panorama needs better pricing, usability, integration, intuitive design, and performance enhancements, plus improved analytics, support, and monitoring.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center report
The integration between Strata Cloud Manager and Panorama could be enhanced to allow customers to stay on Panorama for many years while still utilizing Strata Cloud Manager for deployment.
For more quotes and insights, download the Palo Alto Networks Panorama report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is highly scalable, supporting varied user bases with flexible license expansion and generally high satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.8
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is highly scalable, effectively managing large networks, suitable for medium to large enterprises despite hardware needs.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center report
Scalability is primarily enhanced by Strata Cloud Manager as it is much easier to scale in the cloud than in an on-premises installation.
For more quotes and insights, download the Palo Alto Networks Panorama report
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
8.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center offers flexible, customizable licensing with individual feature fees, leading to variable and sometimes high costs.
No sentiment score available
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers robust features and performance justifying its higher cost, making it a valued investment.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center report
Virtual Panorama is well-priced and is sold every time there's a solution.
For more quotes and insights, download the Palo Alto Networks Panorama report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is stable, with minor issues resolved by updates and effective Cisco support, ensuring reliability.
Sentiment score
7.7
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is praised for its stability and reliability, performing well even during demanding tasks with minimal issues.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.8
Cisco Secure Firewall excels in intrusion prevention, scalability, and integration, offering centralized management and comprehensive security features.
Sentiment score
8.0
Palo Alto Networks Panorama centralizes firewall management, simplifying security configuration and enhancing efficiency with robust, scalable features.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center report
The platform is quite similar to the firewall interface, making it easier for tech consultants to manage.
For more quotes and insights, download the Palo Alto Networks Panorama report
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Firewall Manag...
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
86
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is 9.3%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewall Security Management
 

Featured Reviews

Awais Ejaz - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and reasonably priced product that protects organizations from malware
The product must improve its performance. When we push policies from the console, it takes a lot of time. It takes five to seven minutes to push one policy. If someone pushes a wrong policy and there is an outage in the banking system, they would have to wait six to seven minutes to revert it. We have highlighted this issue to Cisco. A year ago, we told Cisco that we need APIs for integration with SOAR for pushing policies. We cannot push policies or run playbooks from SOAR to block any IOCs on the web and email gateway because Cisco doesn’t expose the APIs. It is one thing for which we have been following up with Cisco for the last year, but I don't think they've developed the API integration. Palo Alto and Fortinet provide this feature to their users.
Read full review
ManjitSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies
Our company uses the solution for monitoring and policies. We monitor data, make rules for firewalls, and allow source IPs to destination IPs with respect to ports and services.  We also use UR filtering to allow or block things. We have a Prisma Access Firewall that we allow or block for remote…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
18%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Engineering Company
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center?
The platform has significantly enhanced our organization's operations by providing secure communication channels between different office locations.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center?
The product pricing is reasonable and falls in the mid-range.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center?
We encountered challenges, particularly when building use cases for this firewall, as it requires specific OS versions and firmware upgrades, which can lead to increased downtime. It adds an admini...
See all answers
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
The most valuable aspect of Palo Alto Networks Panorama for me is the centralized management of multiple firewalls.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
Palo Alto Panorama might appear expensive to some enterprises, but its powerful platform justifies the cost.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
Palo Alto needs to improve deployment by making it easier to deploy an agent to a desktop. Currently, it's complex since the product cannot utilize the AD serving for deployment, which would be a d...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

AWS Firewall Manager vs Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Logo
AWS Firewall Manager vs Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
Compared 72% of the time
More Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Competitors
AlgoSec vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama Logo
AlgoSec vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Compared 19% of the time
AWS Firewall Manager vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama Logo
AWS Firewall Manager vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Compared 17% of the time
Tufin Orchestration Suite vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama Logo
Tufin Orchestration Suite vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Compared 15% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama Logo
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Compared 14% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks Panorama Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
November 2024
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center reportDownload Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center product report
Buyer's Guide
Palo Alto Networks Panorama
November 2024
Palo Alto Networks Panorama reportDownload Palo Alto Networks Panorama product report
 

Learn More

Cisco
Palo Alto Networks
 

Overview

The Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is the administrative nerve center for select Cisco security products running on multiple platforms. It provides unified management of Cisco Secure Firewalls with Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) software for port and protocol control, application control, IPS, URL filtering, and malware protection functions. Firewall Management Center is the centralized event and policy manager for:

● Cisco Secure Firewall with the Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) OS

● Cisco ASA with FirePOWER Services

● Cisco Secure IPS (Firepower Next-Gen IPS / NGIPS)

● Cisco FirePOWER Threat Defense for ISR

● Cisco Malware Defense (AMP)

Panorama network security management provides static rules and dynamic security updates in an ever-changing threat landscape. Reduce administrator workload and improve your overall security posture with a single rule base for firewall, threat prevention, URL filtering, application awareness, user identification, file blocking and data filtering.

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama
October 2024
Free Report: Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.