Top Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Competitors
Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, and Palo Alto Networks Panorama.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
FireMon Security Manager excels in policy and risk analysis, integrating ticketing information and alerting on firewall changes. In comparison, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center supports advanced security features, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive suites but at a higher cost with complex setup.
FireMon Security Manager typically incurs higher setup costs, while Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is noted for a more cost-effective initial setup.
FireMon Security Manager typically incurs higher setup costs, while Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is noted for a more cost-effective initial setup.
Skybox Security Suite offers strong analytics and visibility, aiding in risk management, enticing buyers focused on strategic insights. In comparison, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center excels in threat defense and policy management, attracting those prioritizing security enforcement with seamless integration.
Skybox Security Suite presents a lower setup cost while Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting a key financial distinction between the two solutions.
Skybox Security Suite presents a lower setup cost while Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting a key financial distinction between the two solutions.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers centralized management with advanced automation and security features, ideal for enterprises needing detailed traffic monitoring. In comparison, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center integrates well with other Cisco products, focusing on robust IPS and security intelligence integration.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama's setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its extensive capabilities, while Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, indicating a more straightforward deployment process.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama's setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its extensive capabilities, while Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, indicating a more straightforward deployment process.
AWS Firewall Manager has a straightforward setup with reasonable costs, whereas Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center involves a more complex and higher-priced initial setup.
AWS Firewall Manager has a straightforward setup with reasonable costs, whereas Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center involves a more complex and higher-priced initial setup.
