Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Palo Alto Networks Panorama's customer service is knowledgeable and effective, though improvements are needed in speed, consistency, and pricing.
No sentiment score available
Tufin's support is responsive and knowledgeable, though costs and variability in issue resolution quality warrant improvement.
The tech support I've encountered has been good, prompt, and fast.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
4.4
Panorama needs better pricing, usability, integration, intuitive design, and performance enhancements, plus improved analytics, support, and monitoring.
Sentiment score
5.6
Users seek improved firewall configuration, visibility, vendor integration, on-premises support, cloud integration, GUI, automation, IPV6 compliance, and cost reduction.
The integration between Strata Cloud Manager and Panorama could be enhanced to allow customers to stay on Panorama for many years while still utilizing Strata Cloud Manager for deployment.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is highly scalable, effectively managing large networks, suitable for medium to large enterprises despite hardware needs.
Sentiment score
6.4
Tufin Orchestration Suite excels in scalability, easily handling complex environments and centralizing control for organizations of all sizes.
Scalability is primarily enhanced by Strata Cloud Manager as it is much easier to scale in the cloud than in an on-premises installation.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers robust features and performance justifying its higher cost, making it a valued investment.
Sentiment score
6.0
Enterprise buyers should discuss Tufin Orchestration Suite's pricing flexibility, as costs vary and can be perceived as expensive or competitive.
Virtual Panorama is well-priced and is sold every time there's a solution.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is praised for its stability and reliability, performing well even during demanding tasks with minimal issues.
Sentiment score
8.0
Tufin Orchestration Suite is stable, reliable, and rarely crashes, with occasional issues usually due to external factors like firewall upgrades.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.0
Palo Alto Networks Panorama centralizes firewall management, simplifying security configuration and enhancing efficiency with robust, scalable features.
No sentiment score available
Tufin Orchestration Suite offers compliance checks, monitoring, alerts, easy setup, firewall integration, traffic visualization, automation, and security management.
The platform is quite similar to the firewall interface, making it easier for tech consultants to manage.
 

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
86
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tufin Orchestration Suite
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
181
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (28th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is 9.3%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tufin Orchestration Suite is 21.4%, up from 21.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewall Security Management
 

Featured Reviews

ManjitSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies
Our company uses the solution for monitoring and policies. We monitor data, make rules for firewalls, and allow source IPs to destination IPs with respect to ports and services.  We also use UR filtering to allow or block things. We have a Prisma Access Firewall that we allow or block for remote…
Amroy Lumban Gaol - PeerSpot reviewer
A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments
Integration for Layer 2 devices could be improved because it requires manual scripting. Other layers are very simple to integrate. It would be a benefit to have a form field for firewall names, user names, and passwords which then auto integrate. Licensing options are confusing and require additional fees for high availability. Competitors include high availability with their standard licenses.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
The most valuable aspect of Palo Alto Networks Panorama for me is the centralized management of multiple firewalls.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
Palo Alto Panorama might appear expensive to some enterprises, but its powerful platform justifies the cost.
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
Palo Alto needs to improve deployment by making it easier to deploy an agent to a desktop. Currently, it's complex since the product cannot utilize the AD serving for deployment, which would be a d...
What do you like most about Tufin?
The most valuable feature of Tufin is security auditing. We are able to check the rules and compliance of the company, for example, what is allowed or not. We are able to check the rules over diffe...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tufin?
Tuffin is expensive, and we have to explain to our customers the benefit for them to purchase. If we explain the benefits in the correct way they do not mind the price. We typically do costing for ...
What needs improvement with Tufin?
The reporting function could improve in Tufin. For our clients with companies that have strong compliance, reporting privacy data is mostly a problem. In the IT department, private data needs a fun...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tufin SecureCloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service 
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.