Top 10 Tufin Orchestration Suite Alternatives

Vendor: Tufin

4.0 out of 5

183 reviews
91% willing to recommend

1,961 followers

Top Tufin Orchestration Suite Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Tufin Orchestration Suite based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, and Skybox Security Suite. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Tufin Orchestration Suite surpasses its competitors by delivering comprehensive network security policy management that automates changes, ensures compliance, and provides full visibility across hybrid environments, enhancing security and operational efficiency for enterprises.

Tufin Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Tufin, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

AlgoSec

4.5 out of 5

AlgoSec

4.5 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite offers network visibility and automation, reducing manual effort. In comparison, AlgoSec excels in risk analysis and rule optimization, with comprehensive compliance features. Tufin is ideal for hybrid cloud environments, while AlgoSec provides wider device support and better non-firewall integrations.

Download AlgoSec vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite has a higher setup cost compared to AlgoSec, which offers a more budget-friendly option for deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite has a higher setup cost compared to AlgoSec, which offers a more budget-friendly option for deployment.

FireMon Security Manager

4.1 out of 5

FireMon Security Manager

4.1 out of 5

Tufin excels in automation and unified management across vendors, ideal for reducing manual tasks. In comparison, FireMon provides robust policy optimization and risk analysis, suitable for comprehensive security posture evaluation. Tufin and FireMon address distinct needs with their unique strengths.

Download FireMon Security Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite has a higher setup cost compared to FireMon Security Manager, reflecting its broader functionality and advanced features. FireMon, however, offers a more cost-effective setup, catering to budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Skybox Security Suite

3.8 out of 5

Skybox Security Suite

3.8 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite excels in automating firewall changes and consolidating security management, justifying its pricing through ROI. In comparison, Skybox Security Suite offers comprehensive vulnerability and network assurance, appealing despite high costs, with strong features for users prioritizing compliance and visibility.

Download Skybox Security Suite vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report

Pricing

The Tufin Orchestration Suite involves substantial setup costs, whereas Skybox Security Suite offers a more budget-friendly initial cost. Tufin is noted for its advanced configuration; Skybox provides a more economical entry point for organizations.

View comparison

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Panorama

4.2 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks Panorama

4.2 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite excels in multi-vendor firewall rule management and compliance. In comparison, Panorama by Palo Alto Networks offers centralized management with ecosystem integration. Tufin provides pricing flexibility, while Panorama's advanced security features justify its higher initial cost.

Download Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite's setup cost is reportedly lower, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama has a higher initial investment requirement.

View comparison

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite's setup cost is reportedly lower, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama has a higher initial investment requirement.

AWS Firewall Manager

3.9 out of 5

AWS Firewall Manager

3.9 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite excels in automation and policy analysis, ideal for managing complex networks. In comparison, AWS Firewall Manager targets cloud-native automation, integrating seamlessly with AWS services. Tufin benefits on-premises environments, while AWS's scalability suits dynamic cloud setups.

Download AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite typically has a higher setup cost, whereas AWS Firewall Manager generally offers a more budget-friendly initial expenditure. Both solutions cater to different financial considerations based on initial setup costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Firewall Manager

4.1 out of 5

Azure Firewall Manager

4.1 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite excels in automated policy management and network visibility, supporting compliance and risk management. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager shines with cloud-native integration and centralized oversight, offering advanced threat protection, making it ideal for robust cloud security needs.

Download Azure Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite has higher setup costs compared to Azure Firewall Manager, making Tufin a pricier option upfront while Azure offers a more budget-friendly initiation.

View comparison

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite has higher setup costs compared to Azure Firewall Manager, making Tufin a pricier option upfront while Azure offers a more budget-friendly initiation.

ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer

4.1 out of 5

ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer

4.1 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite's advanced security policy management suits complex environments, while ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer offers affordability and efficient monitoring for diverse firewalls. In comparison, Tufin demands complex deployment, whereas ManageEngine ensures quick setup appealing to medium-sized businesses.

Download ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite has a higher setup cost due to advanced features, while ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer offers a more budget-friendly setup option. The key difference lies in the initial investment, which is significant for Tufin compared to the affordability of ManageEngine.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Defense Orchestrator

4.1 out of 5

Cisco Defense Orchestrator

4.1 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite excels with user-friendly analytics, lower upfront costs, and comprehensive customer support, making it ideal for efficient policy management. In comparison, Cisco Defense Orchestrator offers extensive network orchestration and seamless integration, providing long-term value for established Cisco environments.

Download Cisco Defense Orchestrator vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite features a high setup cost, whereas Cisco Defense Orchestrator is more cost-efficient, highlighting the primary difference in initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite features a high setup cost, whereas Cisco Defense Orchestrator is more cost-efficient, highlighting the primary difference in initial investment.

Opinnate

5.0 out of 5

Opinnate

5.0 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite is favored for its comprehensive policy management, appealing to those prioritizing security. In comparison, Opinnate shines with advanced automation and integration flexibility, attracting organizations focused on workflow automation and scalability. Both serve different needs, giving buyers clear options based on priorities.

Download Opinnate vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite has a considerable setup cost, while Opinnate offers a more affordable initial investment. The pricing structures highlight a key difference in budget considerations for potential users.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Firewall Security Management

Container Security

Vulnerability Management