We performed a comparison between Opinnate and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The platform is easy to deploy and maintain."
"Version upgrades can be done quickly."
"The APIs are the most valuable feature of this solution, as they facilitate integration with ServiceNow and other solutions."
"The change workflow process is flexible and customizable. I was really impressed with it. It's pretty easy. You can add automatic validation steps. Depending on the security matrix, you can pre-allow whatever flow you want."
"The visibility is very good. We have managers who are overseeing it, and they are approving things through it."
"The most valuable feature are role and objects usage for individual objects and app usage."
"The Automatic Policy Generator saves time because we are able to identify the required policy when a client doesn't know what he needs."
"The features I have found most valuable are its capability to check on the firewall and the routers. Afterwards it checks out all the configs, checks the vulnerabilities, checks the risks - it checks everything that may end up causing our router to be compromised. At the end it recommendations what we should do."
"The most valuable features are the GUI interface and the API."
"The reports that this solution provides are very useful."
"PDF format is not available for Alert Composer."
"The product's web page view is very basic. They could add new features to it."
"I don't get the full visibility. There are a lot of improvements which can be done in terms of visibility."
"When it comes to web services, in my experience, Tomcat has always gone down; after a certain amount of load it breaks down and we have to get things restored again."
"We were just talking to them about usage for the F5 platform. They will not be going after specific environments, but a more OpenAPI. They will have other companies write it, etc. It's a little different than I had expected."
"A limitation right now for compressed firewalls is the limited ability to see above a site level in terms of the Topology Mapping in the policy display. While Tufin's actively working on a solution, or at least they have this in the queue, from being able to view this on a higher level and how all of our site networks are connected, this ability would be useful, as we expect to have these compressed firewalls in place for quite some time."
"We have had a couple issues with the VMs, but I think it was just because they were starving for resources. A recommendation on what the virtual appliances should have for resources would be appreciated."
"The GUI needs more visibility in terms of licensing because it is hard to tell which products and licensed and which are not."
"It would be better if they modernized the web GUI. The web interface GUI is simple and not complicated, but it's also too old."
"They are a little bit behind on some of their support for the Palo Alto firewall platform. I'd like to see that catch up, specifically around importing certain objects."
Opinnate is ranked 12th in Firewall Security Management with 2 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 180 reviews. Opinnate is rated 10.0, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Opinnate writes "Good support, nice interface, and simple to upgrade". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Opinnate is most compared with , whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and Illumio. See our Opinnate vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
