RedSeal vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

"RedSeal has different modules, such as the Analyzer module, which can be leveraged."

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score."

"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

"It is extremely scalable. It really addresses the scale of a company's firewall footprint."

"The automated reporting on a regular basis is helping us to be compliant with legal requirements."

"Tufin is quite stable and typically does not require much troubleshooting."

"Tufin is our audit trail for all changes. We have to be PCI compliant, and it's the tool we go to for enforcing PCI on the network side."

"The Topology Map, which feeds into our SecureChange - the latter being an automation platform - there's a lot of synergy between the two."

"Tufin has made handling firewall rule request tickets more centralized and easier to manage."

"Tufin is the only multi-vendor firewall tool that is available, and it helps to bring everything together and report on what all of the rules are."

"SecureChange makes our lives easier with automation."

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency."

"There is room for improvement in integrating the OT security part and the private 5G security part in RedSeal."

"The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

"Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus."

"There are pros and cons to the workflow. You cannot customize it fully and there are some limitations. You cannot create a pure object, a firewall, IP, or service (single layer) object. You can only create a firewall object group. That is one of the challenges."

"I would like to see more about the cloud in the next release. They need a large plan to deploy the cloud into the solution and a way to implement it."

"There was some complexity during the initial setup"

"I would like to see more configuration options on next-generation firewalls, defining possible standards for devices."

"I would like a better reporting feature and automatic alerting based upon rule changes."

"I don't get the full visibility. There are a lot of improvements which can be done in terms of visibility."

"The hardest piece is getting the matrix built."

"I would like something that addresses security in the cloud."

"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."

"Price could always be better, but there are always consequences."

"We have seen ROI in operational aspects, in terms of how long it takes to resolve incidences which arise."

"We did look at less expensive solutions than Tufin, but being a corporation, this solution made sense."

"The cost is pretty high. It's close to seven figures."

"The seller of Tufin, when I wanted the solution, was very flexible because the cost on the lease was very high in Latin America. So, he was able to reduce the cost."

"The additional piece, which we are buying and doesn't include our other solution, is close to 300,000."

"I just wrote a purchase order for it. It is a $150,000 a year."

"It's not that expensive, except for Security Groups. For us, just the Security Groups were about half of the total price. The total was about €500,000 a year, of which €200,000 was for Security Groups."