RedSeal vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

"RedSeal has different modules, such as the Analyzer module, which can be leveraged."

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score."

"We use Tufin to clean up our firewall policies because it is so fast. A report about compliance and the clean-up process used to take about one month up before. With Tufin, it takes only one day."

"The designer gives the ability to know where to add a rule, or if the rule is already in place."

"The most valuable feature is the compliance check and the recommendations that it makes."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting of our risk poster in our firewall."

"In our current environment, the most valuable feature from Tufin is their Network Map."

"It is extremely scalable. It really addresses the scale of a company's firewall footprint."

"I don't think that we were ever slow, but we can now say that changes are completed within twenty-four hours."

"It allows administrators to visualize the traffic flow, and troubleshoot when necessary."

"The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency."

"Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus."

"There is room for improvement in integrating the OT security part and the private 5G security part in RedSeal."

"USP does not support VPNs, which is a big thing for us, so we haven't been able to utilize it."

"There are at least two things that need improvement. One is the business workflow and the second is the integration with logging solutions."

"It could be a little more intuitive."

"The pricing of the solution is rather expensive."

"I would like an improved reporting module which can be flexible (custom reports) and allow us to generate our own reports, because the data is already there."

"We would like to see more in terms of integration with other application types within the context, such as next-generation firewalls or next-generation threat devices that are out there."

"The policy browser has had trouble working. We have experienced bugs."

"I would like to see an improved reporting model that can be flexible for us to generate our own reports. The data's already there."

"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."

"The price is on the cheaper side."

"Pricing is quite high. We did compare it with AlgoSec but the pricing is not much different between the two."

"There are ways to deploy the license to different types of firewall. However, if we decide to change the physical brand of the firewall, we need to go back to Tufin and modify the licensing. This is a hassle."

"Pricing played a big part here... The customer had evaluated other products but, due to price as well as support, they chose Tufin."

"It's quite an expensive solution."

"Tufin makes things a little easier. It lessens the amount of manual work which we have to do. It has a lot of benefits in terms of revenues, profits, employee costs, and operational costs. We have already seen return on investment."

"If you don't buy their premium support, their technical support is not great and you can only call during daytime hours. So, we ended up purchasing their premium support."

"For us it's around $40,000 or so."