RedSeal vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score."

"RedSeal has different modules, such as the Analyzer module, which can be leveraged."

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

"All the basic functions work well."

"The solution is quite scalable."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it reduces both the time required and the number of errors when making changes."

"It gives our firewall administrators visibility into the total infrastructure."

"This solution helps us ensure that security policy is followed across our entire hybrid network. You can have a Unified Security Policy which reaches across all networks, so if you are having a change submitted, it doesn't matter if you're enforcing it or not. You can get an alert saying, "This is a violation." That's a value-add."

"We can get reports with Tufin at anytime. We can have automated reports, even with security and compliance."

"The most valuable feature is alerting, which lets me know when someone has made a change."

"This solution has helped us meet our compliance mandates. Everything is all auditable. Every change is tracked down to the person and time."

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency."

"The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

"Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus."

"There is room for improvement in integrating the OT security part and the private 5G security part in RedSeal."

"We had a discussion in the Customer Advisory Board yesterday around use of SecureChange. We would like to have an opportunity for an engineer to choose if you want to make or take the policy which has been suggested by the designer functionality, making it more human readable or less human readable (more or less granular). This would be huge for the customers who are using SecureChange. They said this was one of their issues with it, especially for anything that was going into a regulator's or auditor's hands. The more human readable, the better that it would be, and this would definitely be applicable to our industry. It sounds like they are working on this issue, or they took the feedback, but that would be a big one for us in being able to make the jump to SecureChange."

"The initial setup can be tough."

"It would be great to add a link to Visio to create shapes directly from Tufin, as it has the configuration."

"Their pricing can be better. It is not very transparent."

"Tufin Orchestration Suite is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendors."

"Our project is running on Riverbed for SDN. I don't know if Tufin can integrate with Riverbed. Other than that, I have no issues with this product."

"I would like to see more about the cloud in the next release. They need a large plan to deploy the cloud into the solution and a way to implement it."

"We found some bugs on the software, but we're working with tech support to fix them."

"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."

"I just wrote a purchase order for it. It is a $150,000 a year."

"The solution has helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. With Tufin, it takes ten to 15 minutes. Before, it was 30 minutes or more."

"The price of Tufin could be lower."

"For us, the pricing was six out of ten, with ten being the most expensive and one being the cheapest."

"The price is on the cheaper side."

"The additional piece, which we are buying and doesn't include our other solution, is close to 300,000."

"Tufin makes things a little easier. It lessens the amount of manual work which we have to do. It has a lot of benefits in terms of revenues, profits, employee costs, and operational costs. We have already seen return on investment."

"The pricing is reasonable."