RedSeal vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

"RedSeal helps you prioritize and allocate your scarce human and capital resources where they have the biggest impact to protect your most-valuable digital assets."

"The most valuable feature I enjoy that is provided by this security analytics platform is the ability to measure resilience."

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score."

"Overall, I am very happy with the way the product is working."

"RedSeal has different modules, such as the Analyzer module, which can be leveraged."

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network; if an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

"It’s the fact that before Tufin it wasn’t possible to manage firewall changes; we used emails, and now different departments can actually intervene at the same time on the same workflow and accelerate the job."

"Tufin Orchestration Suite is a good tool that makes firewall policies faster to implement from a central point, and its support is good."

"For the first one, we were able to reduce the number of rules, and the signaling one is about the compliance."

"It gives me a unified policy across multiple vendors."

"We have a better view of our compliance status."

"Technical Support: Excellent, the support and the post sales service is the best I ever had."

"Performance is good and any queries we run are smooth and straightforward."

"Tufin is our audit trail for all changes. We have to be PCI compliant, and it's the tool we go to for enforcing PCI on the network side."

"The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

"There is room for improvement regarding customization and automation of reports."

"Integration with other security tools. Have the ability to create custom reports: Currently, within RedSeal you only have the option to run the canned reports."

"Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus."

"There is room for improvement in integrating the OT security part and the private 5G security part in RedSeal."

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful."

"Initially their level one support was very frustrating to work with."

"Although we are talking about a very robust platform, I would like to see the Windows compatible VM version come back."

"We have a PS module that we have been developing since we started working with Tufin. It was around two years ago and still isn’t finalized."

"The pricing of the solution is rather expensive."

"We found some bugs on the software, but we're working with tech support to fix them."

"The only issue we have had is that we have been working a long time, from the build and configuration, and we still have one issue that our Palo Alto devices are still not reporting correctly to Tufin and that needs to be resolved."

"I would like to see visibility into the FW features like IPS/Content Filter policies, the same way it does for FW rules/policies."

"There's some functionality that is very simple. I'll call it human reporting, such as a shared secret for a VPN change. Tufin does a really great job providing technical reporting, but it is unreadable to the average person."

"The policy browser has had trouble working. We have experienced bugs."

"Currently, we are able to monitor access rules and the operating system of a firewall. It would be great if we can also monitor the configuration of the firewall through Tufin."

"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."

"I had a bad experience with the financial department, and the price is too high. The software does work and does the job. The solution is worth the money. If I had a different partner to implement the solution, it would have been worth the price."

"The solution has helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. With Tufin, it takes ten to 15 minutes. Before, it was 30 minutes or more."

"This solution helps us reduce the time it takes us to make changes. We're probably saving time by 25%."

"We have seen ROI just in the time savings and knowledge. Knowledge is power. Having the solution do it automatically for you without you doing the work is huge. If you are spending $50,000 a year, it could have cost you a $100,000 in man-hours without it, especially if you are working with a team.."

"Its price is reasonable, but it could be lower. It has been cost-effective for us. We have a contract for three years."

"Pricing played a big part here... The customer had evaluated other products but, due to price as well as support, they chose Tufin."

"I believe our cost is more than $100,000 per year."

"Our licensing fees are more than $100,000 USD per year."