RedSeal vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score."

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

"RedSeal has different modules, such as the Analyzer module, which can be leveraged."

"It provides a real-time sense of how the policies are configured and whether there are any shadow rules. Another great thing is that it provides greater reporting based on how the rules have been set up."

"I like the fact that Tufin was able to integrate with our firewalls, which include Palo Alto and FortiGate."

"We are using the visibility with notifications on every firewall change and what those changes were. We have visibility to see who is making the changes, and when."

"The designer gives the ability to know where to add a rule, or if the rule is already in place."

"The change workflow process is flexible and customizable. We have one guy who has never logged into Tufin ever in his life. He sits down and in 30 minutes had written an automation routine, then went back and changed it. He did that with no training. For me, that is a major benefit."

"Comparing the rules and policy browser is valuable to me. It gives me the ability to pull running configs and be able to analyze them without having to go directly into the firewall."

"The stability is bulletproof."

"Overall, I would rate Tufin Orchestration Suite eight on a scale of one to ten."

"Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus."

"The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

"There is room for improvement in integrating the OT security part and the private 5G security part in RedSeal."

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency."

"I would like more enforcement. Right now. it's a lot of alerting. You see it in Tufin, but you have to go to Check Point or whatever device to make the actual action."

"There are things that could be explained a little better for somebody brand new to this system, which could be helpful, especially if it was in real-time while you were working in the system. Having the ability in real-time to be able to understand search query suggestions would be helpful."

"In the next release I would like to see better migration in the Cloud because that will allow more visibility in the network."

"I would like to see API access into every aspect of Tufin."

"The older version that we have doesn't support some newer firewall vendors."

"The GUI is limited with respect to how much you can develop and visualize the process."

"I would like to see better report integration in this solution."

"I would like the application to have faster response times. E.g., the dashboard may take up to two minutes to load. Or, when we do the topology seating its two and a half hours. I would like to get those times down and increase the efficiency of the product there."

"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."

"We haven't purchased the license yet for SecureChange. We do have plans to buy it next year."

"Our engineers are spending less time on manual processes: 20 to 30 hour plus."

"Because we're quite a large company, the price wasn't too much of a factor for us."

"There is no issue with the pricing because we used a VM. That kept the cost low, as compared to an appliance."

"Tufin makes things a little easier. It lessens the amount of manual work which we have to do. It has a lot of benefits in terms of revenues, profits, employee costs, and operational costs. We have already seen return on investment."

"Pricing is quite high. We did compare it with AlgoSec but the pricing is not much different between the two."

"The price of Tufin could be lower."

"I believe our cost is more than $100,000 per year."