RedSeal vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

"RedSeal has different modules, such as the Analyzer module, which can be leveraged."

"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score."

"Tufin is quite stable and typically does not require much troubleshooting."

"The solution is good, and no clients complained about it."

"It provides a comprehensive overview of what our network looks like in terms of what is allowed and what is not, then how the traffic' is flowing with the Network Topology Map."

"The solution helps us meet our compliance needs."

"We are using the visibility with notifications on every firewall change and what those changes were. We have visibility to see who is making the changes, and when."

"It provides a real-time sense of how the policies are configured and whether there are any shadow rules. Another great thing is that it provides greater reporting based on how the rules have been set up."

"The designer gives the ability to know where to add a rule, or if the rule is already in place."

"We were hit by the NotPetya attack. Therefore, our whole company and all its sites were down for several months. So, you don't have an attack like that and not need something like Tufin. Other companies can prevent these attacks, or at least slow them down, by having this type of a tool. We will never go back."

"The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

"There is room for improvement in integrating the OT security part and the private 5G security part in RedSeal."

"Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus."

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency."

"We want to have the ability for a ticket requester to add somebody, or to give somebody view rights to their ticket."

"I would like an improved reporting module which can be flexible (custom reports) and allow us to generate our own reports, because the data is already there."

"They've got such a large number of APIs, and it is so easy to use their APIs. Effectively, they allow us to use it with anything. The only way to improve it more is by offering support for implementing their APIs into certain hardware or software that we might use. They can provide support for implementing APIs."

"I would like something that addresses security in the cloud."

"Currently, we are able to monitor access rules and the operating system of a firewall. It would be great if we can also monitor the configuration of the firewall through Tufin."

"They need to offer more support to vendors, such as Cisco, Checkpoint, Fortinet, and Forcepoint."

"The design needs improvement, particularly in recognizing target devices and target files. Additionally, there's a need for an improved network map."

"The documentation site is horrible as well. It has a tree structure, and you really get lost quite easily."

"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."

"We've seen a decrease of about 50 percent in the overall time it takes to complete a firewall change."

"For us, the pricing was six out of ten, with ten being the most expensive and one being the cheapest."

"Our licensing fees are more than $100,000 USD per year."

"Pricing is quite high. We did compare it with AlgoSec but the pricing is not much different between the two."

"The licensing costs are around $250,000 to $300,000."

"Our evaluation showed that Tufin's features were on par with AlgoSec, but Tufin was the better financial choice."

"While licensing varies greatly, it is about $50,000 a year."

"We did look at less expensive solutions than Tufin, but being a corporation, this solution made sense."