RedSeal vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

"RedSeal has different modules, such as the Analyzer module, which can be leveraged."

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score."

"It's hard to pick the most valuable feature. All of them are valuable, they're all critical for us... ChangeTrack obviously has a lot of very good features, like the risk analysis, the USP, and the Policy Browser."

"The most valuable feature of Tufin is rule analysis."

"The consolidation of other firewall vendors is very valuable."

"We use Tufin to clean up our firewall policies. It benefits us, because you can run a query for whatever your cleanup criteria is, e.g., "Has it been hit in 90 days?" It displays the list, then you can see the rules right there. If you want to get rid of it (or highlight it), then it creates a ticket that goes ahead and flags them all as disabled. While you can delete them, we always disable first. Then, we have a strip that comes back, and if it's been disabled for 90 days, then the system will remove them."

"Our engineers save quite a bit of time that was previously spent on manual processes."

"It has helped us to meet our compliance mandates. We have some requirements that we need to provide more visibility on the risk levels of our firewall base and Tufin helped us with that requirement."

"It allows administrators to visualize the traffic flow, and troubleshoot when necessary."

"The automation because it is saving a lot of work, time, and effort required to do all of our manual work. The change impact analysis is pretty good, and with the automation, it takes care of a lot of things which we would be doing manually."

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency."

"There is room for improvement in integrating the OT security part and the private 5G security part in RedSeal."

"The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

"Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus."

"I haven't seen the cloud integration yet, and I would like to see if we could audit the cloud firewalls, like the cloud-native, Azure, and Amazon. That would be nice. You want one tool to do everything. I don't want to use another tool, or manually go and audit the cloud firewalls."

"The integration with different products needs to be improved."

"The pricing could be a bit more competitive."

"USP does not support VPNs, which is a big thing for us, so we haven't been able to utilize it."

"I would like to see AI elements included with this solution."

"I would like to see the setup of the Unified Security Policy simplified."

"Their pricing can be better. It is not very transparent."

"I would like to see API access into every aspect of Tufin."

"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."

"Our evaluation showed that Tufin's features were on par with AlgoSec, but Tufin was the better financial choice."

"While licensing varies greatly, it is about $50,000 a year."

"This solution helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. We used to spend up to an hour to do a change, and now, it's around five minutes."

"I just wrote a purchase order for it. It is a $150,000 a year."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Price could always be better, but there are always consequences."

"Our engineers are spending less time on manual processes: 20 to 30 hour plus."

"Our licensing fees are more than $100,000 USD per year."