RedSeal vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

"RedSeal has different modules, such as the Analyzer module, which can be leveraged."

"RedSeal integrates the network and gives us a visual or graphical overview of our network. If an organization is geographically dispersed, for instance, with one office in Canada and one office in the Philippines, the whole network, including all devices, is integrated into RedSeal, and you can see from where the traffic is going in and out."

"The most valuable features are network mapping and configuration."

"This is the only solution in the world that gives you a digital resilience score."

"It is extremely scalable. It really addresses the scale of a company's firewall footprint."

"The most valuable feature is alerting, which lets me know when someone has made a change."

"We use Tufin to clean up our firewall policies. It benefits us, because you can run a query for whatever your cleanup criteria is, e.g., "Has it been hit in 90 days?" It displays the list, then you can see the rules right there. If you want to get rid of it (or highlight it), then it creates a ticket that goes ahead and flags them all as disabled. While you can delete them, we always disable first. Then, we have a strip that comes back, and if it's been disabled for 90 days, then the system will remove them."

"Tufin has improved my organization with its configuration management. It has tremendously improved the operation's success and has made life easier."

"Tufin Orchestration Suite is a good tool that makes firewall policies faster to implement from a central point, and its support is good."

"I had been impressed with the depth of capabilities within SecureTrack, particularly, in terms of generating insights for a user and firewall operator. With SecureTrack, I've been impressed with the level of flexibility with workflow design and its ability to generate different work streams and flows through the tool that are customized for our organization processes."

"The most valuable feature are role and objects usage for individual objects and app usage."

"This solution has helped our clients because it allows them to leverage the tools so that they can actually reduce their overall expenses for the environment."

"Sometimes, it required us to refresh the configuration. When we integrated any of the configurations into the device, sometimes, it could not detect the exact picture of that device. So, we had to reset the device to see that if it was giving true-positive results or false-positive results. In some cases, we were not able to get true-positive results. There was some kind of bug in that version. Its interface is not user-friendly and needs to be improved. It takes time to understand the interface and various options. Skybox has quite a user-friendly interface. They could provide a feature for compliance audit policy if it is already not there. A compliance audit policy ensures that all configurations are based on the best practices standards, such as CIS benchmarks standard or other similar standards. It provides visibility about whether your device configuration is based on best practices or not. Usually, such a feature is provided by other solutions such as Meteor or Tenable Nessus."

"There is room for improvement in integrating the OT security part and the private 5G security part in RedSeal."

"One of the areas of concern is the GUI. It is important to our customers that the GUI looks beautiful. It's a Java Client, so you have a Java dependency."

"The dashboard should be improved to make correlating data easier to do."

"The firewall management is complex for beginners."

"I think that the interface could be cleaner, and easier to use."

"The initial setup was complex. We have a big environment which contributed to the setup's complexity."

"We will be using the appliance based product, which cannot be scaled as much. It is a limitation in the hardware."

"In the next release I would like to see better migration in the Cloud because that will allow more visibility in the network."

"One of the areas that I've had challenges with is making complicated reports."

"We want to have the ability for a ticket requester to add somebody, or to give somebody view rights to their ticket."

"It could be a little more intuitive."

"The pricing is based on the number of endpoints and devices, and we have seen it range from mid-five figures to low six figures."

"I had a bad experience with the financial department, and the price is too high. The software does work and does the job. The solution is worth the money. If I had a different partner to implement the solution, it would have been worth the price."

"Tuffin is expensive, and we have to explain to our customers the benefit for them to purchase. If we explain the benefits in the correct way they do not mind the price. We typically do costing for the customer for three to five years. We make the general total cost of ownership at the beginning of a project for our customers."

"Our licensing fees are approximately $100,000 USD yearly."

"The licensing costs are a significant amount of money."

"Our engineers are spending less time on manual processes: 20 to 30 hour plus."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Pricing is quite high. We did compare it with AlgoSec but the pricing is not much different between the two."

"The solution is more reasonably priced than its competitors."