Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FireMon Security Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Tufin's support is responsive and knowledgeable, though costs and variability in issue resolution quality warrant improvement.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
5.6
Users seek improved firewall configuration, visibility, vendor integration, on-premises support, cloud integration, GUI, automation, IPV6 compliance, and cost reduction.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.4
Tufin Orchestration Suite excels in scalability, easily handling complex environments and centralizing control for organizations of all sizes.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
6.0
Enterprise buyers should discuss Tufin Orchestration Suite's pricing flexibility, as costs vary and can be perceived as expensive or competitive.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.0
Tufin Orchestration Suite is stable, reliable, and rarely crashes, with occasional issues usually due to external factors like firewall upgrades.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Tufin Orchestration Suite offers compliance checks, monitoring, alerts, easy setup, firewall integration, traffic visualization, automation, and security management.
 

Categories and Ranking

FireMon Security Manager
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tufin Orchestration Suite
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
181
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (28th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of FireMon Security Manager is 16.2%, up from 16.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tufin Orchestration Suite is 21.4%, up from 21.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewall Security Management
 

Featured Reviews

JeffReese - PeerSpot reviewer
Makes compliance much easier compared to doing it manually, and automates policy changes across environments
People have a tendency to just add rules to firewalls, but they don't go back and take rules away. Some of our customers have thousands of unused rules that have been sitting out there for over a year. In one report, FireMon tells us there are, say, 1,000 rules that can be taken out and it gives us the ability to disable those for a year and to track when we made our changes. After a year, we can go back and eliminate the rules, to bring the configuration down to an almost human-readable level. It also identifies risks in your environment and helps to prioritize fixes. It actually rates the risk level, meaning you look for the red and try to bring everything to green.
Amroy Lumban Gaol - PeerSpot reviewer
A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments
Integration for Layer 2 devices could be improved because it requires manual scripting. Other layers are very simple to integrate. It would be a benefit to have a form field for firewall names, user names, and passwords which then auto integrate. Licensing options are confusing and require additional fees for high availability. Competitors include high availability with their standard licenses.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about FireMon?
I like the Security Manager console where we can see any changes that have been made or pull the results of an assessment and control the policies that we implement.
What needs improvement with FireMon?
We've had recurring issues managing FireMon's internal backups. Sometimes, the space allocated for the backup is full, and there is no process where it deletes files that are older than I certain d...
What is your primary use case for FireMon?
We use Security Manager for firewall changes, monitoring, and audits.
What do you like most about Tufin?
The most valuable feature of Tufin is security auditing. We are able to check the rules and compliance of the company, for example, what is allowed or not. We are able to check the rules over diffe...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tufin?
Tuffin is expensive, and we have to explain to our customers the benefit for them to purchase. If we explain the benefits in the correct way they do not mind the price. We typically do costing for ...
What needs improvement with Tufin?
The reporting function could improve in Tufin. For our clients with companies that have strong compliance, reporting privacy data is mostly a problem. In the IT department, private data needs a fun...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tufin SecureCloud
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Convey, MGM Resorts International, Southwest Airlines, Alkami, Costco, Aetna, IBM, Verizon, Wells Fargo
3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service 
Find out what your peers are saying about FireMon Security Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.