Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
FireMon Security Manager Logo

Top 10 FireMon Security Manager Alternatives

Vendor: FireMon
4.1 out of 5
1,774 followers
Post review

Top FireMon Security Manager Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to FireMon Security Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, and Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. FireMon Security Manager surpasses its competitors by offering real-time visibility, seamless policy automation, and advanced risk assessment, enabling organizations to efficiently manage complex networks and enhance their security posture.

FireMon Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with FireMon, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
FireMon Security Manager Logo
AlgoSec
4.5 out of 5
FireMon Security Manager Logo
AlgoSec
4.5 out of 5
AlgoSec excels in visibility and risk management, enhancing security posture, though more expensive. In comparison, FireMon Security Manager offers flexible licensing and cost-effective support, optimizing resource allocation. AlgoSec suits compliance-focused buyers, while FireMon appeals to varying organizational sizes. Both improve firewall policy efficiency.
Download AlgoSec vs. FireMon Security Manager Report
AlgoSec has a higher setup cost, while FireMon Security Manager offers a more affordable initial setup. These differences highlight distinct pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
AlgoSec has a higher setup cost, while FireMon Security Manager offers a more affordable initial setup. These differences highlight distinct pricing strategies.
FireMon Security Manager Logo
FireMon Security Manager Logo
Tufin Orchestration Suite
4.0 out of 5
Tufin excels in automation and unified management across vendors, ideal for reducing manual tasks. In comparison, FireMon provides robust policy optimization and risk analysis, suitable for comprehensive security posture evaluation. Tufin and FireMon address distinct needs with their unique strengths.
Download FireMon Security Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report
Tufin Orchestration Suite has a higher setup cost compared to FireMon Security Manager, reflecting its broader functionality and advanced features. FireMon, however, offers a more cost-effective setup, catering to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Tufin Orchestration Suite has a higher setup cost compared to FireMon Security Manager, reflecting its broader functionality and advanced features. FireMon, however, offers a more cost-effective setup, catering to budget-conscious users.
FireMon Security Manager Logo
FireMon Security Manager Logo
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud
4.1 out of 5
FireMon Security Manager offers extensive policy review and redundancy detection, suitable for complex on-premises setups needing advanced support. In comparison, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud delivers centralized management and affordability, appealing to those seeking streamlined control across hybrid cloud environments at a lower cost.
Download FireMon Security Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud Report
FireMon Security Manager has a higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers a more economical option for initial deployment, highlighting a significant cost distinction between the two security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
FireMon Security Manager has a higher setup cost, while Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers a more economical option for initial deployment, highlighting a significant cost distinction between the two security solutions.
FireMon Security Manager Logo
FireMon Security Manager Logo
Skybox Security Suite
3.8 out of 5
FireMon Security Manager offers robust rule management and policy compliance tools, enhancing firewall efficiency. In comparison, Skybox Security Suite excels in integration with its comprehensive vulnerability management. Both solutions cater to different business needs, leveraging their feature sets for improved security and network management.
Download FireMon Security Manager vs. Skybox Security Suite Report
FireMon Security Manager is noted for its higher initial setup cost, while Skybox Security Suite offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting significant cost differences between these security management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
FireMon Security Manager is noted for its higher initial setup cost, while Skybox Security Suite offers a more budget-friendly option, highlighting significant cost differences between these security management solutions.
FireMon Security Manager Logo
FireMon Security Manager Logo
Palo Alto Networks Panorama
4.2 out of 5
FireMon Security Manager is ideal for robust firewall rule management and policy visibility, excelling in automation. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers centralized management with extensive integration, making it suitable for large deployments needing comprehensive security features.
Download FireMon Security Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report
FireMon Security Manager has a more affordable setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks Panorama, which has a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
FireMon Security Manager has a more affordable setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks Panorama, which has a higher initial expense.
FireMon Security Manager Logo
FireMon Security Manager Logo
AWS Firewall Manager
3.9 out of 5
FireMon Security Manager offers comprehensive, cross-vendor security features ideal for high-performance environments. In comparison, AWS Firewall Manager is cost-effective with cloud-focused scalability but lacks extensive audit capabilities. FireMon provides robust on-premises support, while AWS is user-friendly for hybrid deployments.
Download AWS Firewall Manager vs. FireMon Security Manager Report
FireMon Security Manager has higher setup costs compared to AWS Firewall Manager, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making AWS the choice for those prioritizing budget efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
FireMon Security Manager has higher setup costs compared to AWS Firewall Manager, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making AWS the choice for those prioritizing budget efficiency.
FireMon Security Manager Logo
FireMon Security Manager Logo
Azure Firewall Manager
4.1 out of 5
FireMon Security Manager excels in policy automation and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager integrates seamlessly with Azure services and offers scalability. Buyers might choose FireMon for its affordability and insight or Azure for cloud-native features and integration.
Download Azure Firewall Manager vs. FireMon Security Manager Report
FireMon Security Manager has an upfront setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall Manager offers a more cost-efficient initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
FireMon Security Manager has an upfront setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall Manager offers a more cost-efficient initial setup.
FireMon Security Manager Logo
FireMon Security Manager Logo
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer
4.1 out of 5
FireMon Security Manager offers robust policy management and automated compliance checks for complex networks. In comparison, ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer delivers comprehensive log analysis and real-time monitoring, appealing to those seeking extensive features, straightforward deployment, and cost-effectiveness.
Download FireMon Security Manager vs. ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer Report
FireMon Security Manager often incurs a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer, making it less appealing for cost-sensitive implementations requiring lower initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
FireMon Security Manager often incurs a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer, making it less appealing for cost-sensitive implementations requiring lower initial investment.
FireMon Security Manager Logo
FireMon Security Manager Logo
Cisco Defense Orchestrator
4.1 out of 5
FireMon Security Manager offers advanced network topology mapping and compliance tools, attracting those seeking extensive network visibility. In comparison, Cisco Defense Orchestrator appeals with seamless integration and scalability, ideal for cloud-centered environments seeking robust feature sets and perceived value.
Download Cisco Defense Orchestrator vs. FireMon Security Manager Report
FireMon Security Manager is praised for its competitive setup cost, while Cisco Defense Orchestrator is noted for having a higher upfront expense, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
FireMon Security Manager is praised for its competitive setup cost, while Cisco Defense Orchestrator is noted for having a higher upfront expense, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
FireMon Security Manager Logo
FireMon Security Manager Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center
4.0 out of 5
FireMon Security Manager excels in policy and risk analysis, integrating ticketing information and alerting on firewall changes. In comparison, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center supports advanced security features, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive suites but at a higher cost with complex setup.
Download Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs. FireMon Security Manager Report
FireMon Security Manager typically incurs higher setup costs, while Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is noted for a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
FireMon Security Manager typically incurs higher setup costs, while Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is noted for a more cost-effective initial setup.

Related categories

Firewall Security Management
Vulnerability Management
Microsoft Security Suite