AWS Firewall Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Tufin are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.5, while Tufin is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.3% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Tufin’s 14.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tufin users who would recommend it.

AWS Firewall Manager

Read 11 AWS Firewall Manager reviews

1,491 Views
1,491 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Read 182 Tufin Orchestration Suite reviews

12,537 Views
9,277 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

AWS Firewall Manager

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Tufin Orchestration Suite and AWS Firewall Manager compete in the network security domain. Tufin stands out with its robust feature set and scalability, while AWS Firewall Manager excels in centralized policy management and seamless integration with AWS services.

Features: Tufin Orchestration Suite provides capabilities like change automation, policy management, and application awareness, offering significant improvements in rule management and compliance. AWS Firewall Manager excels in centralized policy management and automatic enforcement of policies across multiple accounts, integrating smoothly with AWS services like WAF and Shield, offering compliance monitoring and auto-remediation features.

Room for Improvement: Tufin needs better third-party integrations, improved reporting, enhanced topology handling, and a more simplified licensing model. AWS Firewall Manager could benefit from a simplified interface, better logging capabilities, and more granular compliance reporting, and third-party integration options to become more accessible and user-friendly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tufin Orchestration Suite supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, with mixed reviews on technical support due to slow escalation but praised collaboration with Israeli R&D teams. AWS Firewall Manager offers effective support, though it requires better documentation of its complex service ecosystem and is mainly deployed in public and hybrid clouds.

Pricing and ROI: Tufin Orchestration Suite is seen as expensive due to complex licensing, resulting in varied user opinions on cost-effectiveness, though its features drive significant ROI. AWS Firewall Manager is viewed as cost-effective with its pay-as-you-go model, integrated into AWS billing, providing good value through automation and security benefits, despite broader AWS licensing costs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

182

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AWS Firewall Manager is 4.3%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tufin Orchestration Suite is 14.9%, down from 22.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tufin Orchestration Suite	14.9%
AWS Firewall Manager	4.3%
Other	80.8%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security policies have streamlined audits and ensure consistent protection by default

One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option. The compliance reports are helpful, but having more granular insights or export options would make it even easier to use during audits. Also, support for more third-party integration could improve flexibility. Another improvement I need to see is a smoother setup experience. Some of the initial configuration steps, especially around the organization and permissions, can feel complex. A more guided setup or clear UI explanation would make it easier for teams to adopt quickly. One more improvement would be better alerting options. Right now, we mostly rely on AWS Security Hub or CloudWatch for detailed alerts. Having more built-in, real-time notification directly from AWS Firewall Manager would make it easier to monitor policy violations without extra setup.

Read full review

reviewer2688339

Works

Vulnerability control saves audit costs and reduces expenses for organizations

Tufin Orchestration Suite is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendors. The analytics features of Tufin Orchestration Suite are challenging to use and require technical expertise, which is a concern as there is not much knowledge in this field in Thailand. The issue of technical knowledge, especially regarding English language proficiency, is significant for government and some companies, making Tufin Orchestration Suite harder to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, it improved our security posture and made audits much easier."

"My advice for anybody who is considering the AWS Firewall Manager is that it is pretty simple to set up and easy to use."

"The product is highly reliable."

"AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."

"After implementing AWS Firewall Manager, we reduced our manual security configuration effort by around sixty to seventy percent as the policies are now centralized, managed, and automatically enforced."

"It is helpful for our compliance, as the compliance manager manages compliance with leading industry standards such as FedRAMP, which my company complies with, GDPR laws, and ISO 27001."

"It has centralized cloud firewall management rules. It provides compliance in tracking and reporting."

"The most valuable feature is scaling, which allows you to deploy one configuration and scan and deploy it across the network. The automated policy application feature also streamlines security operations."

More AWS Firewall Manager pros

"The huge ROI we witnessed has resulted in us identifying that we can go to market to gain more customers and really broaden our customer base without the 'con' of hiring more people."

"The stability is bulletproof."

"Tufin seems like a high quality product from a company that cares."

"Tufin's given us the ability to correlate between policy and firewall rules."

"The compliance aspect of the solution is its most valuable aspect."

"I'd definitely say go with Tufin as it's a brilliant solution."

"The solution helps us ensure that security policy is followed across our entire hybrid network."

"The reporting simplifies the ability to report towards the business about how our rules are being used so we can make sure the security is always optimally maintained."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pros

Cons

"They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner"

"AWS Firewall Manager could be improved with more granular policy customization for better visibility through enhanced dashboards and reporting."

"This solution is suitable for a small-scale enterprise and may not scale up to a very high volume of traffic or a large number of servers."

"Enabling and configuring the logging is not that straightforward."

"One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option."

"The areas of improvement are definitely platform resiliency, as we have seen outages on the AWS backbone, and whenever there is an outage on the AWS backbone, it impacts all the services hosted on that region, so we expect regional resiliency."

"For AWS WAF, we have seen cases where it allowed suspicious HTTPS headers even if they carried malicious payloads."

"AWS Firewall Manager should be open to manage other third-party appliances as well."

More AWS Firewall Manager cons

"The firewall management is complex for beginners, and the solution could be improved by including icons that provide insight into what they are and how they function."

"The network part of the solution could be improved. It's too hard because of the Tufin licensing model for the routing devices."

"The initial setup was time consuming."

"We like the change impact analysis capabilities quite a bit. The only weakness is that the reporting is a bit clunky. We would like to have the reporting be better."

"I work on the network and security sides. The network visibility side needs improvement."

"The firewall management is complex for beginners."

"We had a discussion in the Customer Advisory Board yesterday around use of SecureChange. We would like to have an opportunity for an engineer to choose if you want to make or take the policy which has been suggested by the designer functionality, making it more human readable or less human readable (more or less granular). This would be huge for the customers who are using SecureChange. They said this was one of their issues with it, especially for anything that was going into a regulator's or auditor's hands. The more human readable, the better that it would be, and this would definitely be applicable to our industry. It sounds like they are working on this issue, or they took the feedback, but that would be a big one for us in being able to make the jump to SecureChange."

"I would like to see the hardware specifications improved."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From what I've heard from my colleagues, it appears that the pricing is competitive, which influenced our decision to choose this option."

"It is a cost-efficient product."

"The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly."

"I believe our cost is more than $100,000 per year."

"For us, the pricing was six out of ten, with ten being the most expensive and one being the cheapest."

"Tufin reduced the time it takes to solve a problem, which reduces the time of the outage."

"We have seen ROI in operational aspects, in terms of how long it takes to resolve incidences which arise."

"Its price is reasonable, but it could be lower. It has been cost-effective for us. We have a contract for three years."

"Tufin and AlgoSec were pretty much in the competitive price range, but this one provided us better integration into the Check Point environment."

"The price of Tufin could be lower."

"Licensing is available in both perpetual and subscription models, and it appears to be good for our scalable environments."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	153

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Firewall Manager?

The pricing is reasonable and follows a pay-as-you-go model, which makes it cost-effective for scaling the environment. There is no significant setup cost since the native AWS services and licensin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Firewall Manager?

AWS Firewall Manager could be improved with more granular policy customization for better visibility through enhanced dashboards and reporting. Simplifying the initial setup and providing clearer d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager?

My primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager is to centrally manage and enforce security policies across the multiple AWS accounts and resources within our organization. It helps to streamline the ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tufin SecureCloud?

Tufin Orchestration Suite ( /products/tufin-orchestration-suite-reviews ) is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tufin SecureCloud?

I have primarily used Skybox and AlgoSec ( /products/algosec-reviews ). I have also interacted with FireMon for compiling. However, I am not currently working with ACA, and I don't have any project...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tufin SecureCloud?

There is potential for improvement in explaining the analytics in the dashboard for Tufin Orchestration Suite. Tufin Orchestration Suite does provide good monitoring; however, interpreting the grap...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 14% of the time

AlgoSec vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Security Cloud Control vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Firewall Manager Competitors

AlgoSec vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 22% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 20% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable.io Container Security vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager

September 2026

Download AWS Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Tufin Orchestration Suite

September 2026

Download Tufin Orchestration Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tufin SecureCloud

Overview

AWS Firewall Manager provides centralized security policy management across multiple AWS accounts, automating rule enforcement and enhancing compliance efforts seamlessly integrated with AWS services like WAF and Shield.

AWS Firewall Manager is designed for efficient security policy management, offering features like automatic rule enforcement and real-time compliance monitoring. The platform integrates with AWS services, assisting organizations in streamlining audits through centralized management and accurate analytics. Its built-in compliance dashboard and scalability features help reduce manual workloads and potential security misconfigurations, while community support aids in addressing challenges swiftly.

What are AWS Firewall Manager's standout features?

Centralized Policy Management: Streamlines rule enforcement across accounts.
Real-Time Compliance Monitoring: Tracks policy adherence seamlessly.
Auto-Remediation: Automatically addresses security issues.
Seamless Integration: Works well with AWS services like WAF and Shield.
Compliance Dashboard: Offers clarity and insights for audits.

What benefits and ROI should organizations evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces manual efforts and misconfigurations.
Streamlined Audits: Simplifies compliance checks and reporting.
Efficiency Across Accounts: Brings consistency to security rules.
Community Support: Provides quick solutions to challenges.

Industries with regulatory requirements often implement AWS Firewall Manager to manage security policies, ensuring consistent enforcement of WAF rules and protecting web applications from threats like SQL injection. It's crucial for environments needing compliance monitoring and regular updates, especially in sectors dealing with cloud infrastructure and file transfers.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Tufin Orchestration Suite offers change tracking, policy management, automation, and comprehensive visibility, aiding in secure and efficient network control. Its customization capabilities enable efficient rule analysis and optimization for multiple vendors.

With its robust capabilities, Tufin Orchestration Suite facilitates firewall policy management, automation, and compliance. Organizations benefit from its role in auditing, rule cleanup, policy standardization, and change tracking. While it provides efficient network orchestration, challenges such as dated interface design, incomplete cloud platform integration, and slow report generation demand attention. Security policy automation and vendor integration improvements are essential. Despite these issues, Tufin is crucial for managing multi-vendor environments and coordinating change management. Centralized management offers benefits in monitoring, reporting, risk assessment, role recertification, and network orchestration.

What are the key features of Tufin Orchestration Suite?

Change Tracking: Monitors network modifications to enhance security management.
Policy Management: Helps standardize and enforce security regulations effectively.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides detailed insights into network activities.
Automation: Streamlines tasks, reducing manual effort and potential errors.
Firewall Cleanup: Assists in identifying and removing redundant rules for optimal performance.
Compliance Auditing: Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements.
Report Generation: Offers insights and data for informed decision-making.
Customization: Supports user-specific needs for rule analysis and optimization.

What benefits can users expect from Tufin Orchestration Suite?

Enhanced Security: Improved control reduces vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Automation streamlines workflows and minimizes mistakes.
Multivendor Support: Facilitates integration across different firewall environments.
Cost Savings: Optimized processes and reduced manual labor lower operational costs.
User-Friendly Deployment: Simplifies integration and start-up processes.

In finance, Tufin integrates with existing systems to automate security policy management and ensure compliance, optimizing efficiency and risk management. In healthcare, it aids regulatory adherence and patient data protection, while in retail, it enhances security protocols amid a diverse vendor landscape.

Tufin

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

September 2026

Free Report: AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.