AWS Firewall Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Tufin are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Tufin is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.1% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Tufin’s 19.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tufin users who would recommend it.

AWS Firewall Manager

Read 11 AWS Firewall Manager reviews

1,043 Views
1,043 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Read 182 Tufin Orchestration Suite reviews

6,965 Views
6,269 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

AWS Firewall Manager

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Tufin Orchestration Suite and AWS Firewall Manager compete in the network security management category. Tufin Orchestration Suite seems to have the upper hand with its ability to manage multi-vendor environments and provide detailed policy analysis.

Features: Tufin Orchestration Suite includes SecureTrack for rule implementation and audit compliance, SecureChange for automated workflow management, and multi-vendor support for unified security management. It allows detailed network analysis supporting various firewall configurations. AWS Firewall Manager offers robust automation for policy management, easy integration within the AWS ecosystem, and cloud-native security features that simplify AWS resource protection.

Room for Improvement: Tufin Orchestration Suite could improve its topology visualization, expand support for additional security devices, and enhance third-party tool integration. Users express a need for a more user-friendly interface and flexible reporting options. AWS Firewall Manager would benefit from better documentation, expanded logging capabilities, and greater feature customization to enhance its functionality outside AWS environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tufin Orchestration Suite primarily deploys on-premises, supporting hybrid and private cloud setups, offering significant control but with complex deployment. Customer service is mostly praised, although experiences vary. AWS Firewall Manager is straightforward to deploy in public and hybrid cloud environments, ideal for AWS users, with generally well-regarded customer service, though improved non-AWS integration support is desired.

Pricing and ROI: Tufin Orchestration Suite is priced higher due to its extensive features, but it promises strong ROI through process simplification. Its complex licensing is based on device support. AWS Firewall Manager offers flexible cost governance but might be considered costly by some due to its pay-as-you-go model, yet it provides agility in cloud settings. Both tools enhance ROI by streamlining security operations, catering to different needs and scales.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,732 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

182

Ranking in other categories

AI Observability (79th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AWS Firewall Manager is 3.1%, down from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tufin Orchestration Suite is 19.8%, down from 22.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tufin Orchestration Suite	19.8%
AWS Firewall Manager	3.1%
Other	77.1%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security policies have streamlined audits and ensure consistent protection by default

One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option. The compliance reports are helpful, but having more granular insights or export options would make it even easier to use during audits. Also, support for more third-party integration could improve flexibility. Another improvement I need to see is a smoother setup experience. Some of the initial configuration steps, especially around the organization and permissions, can feel complex. A more guided setup or clear UI explanation would make it easier for teams to adopt quickly. One more improvement would be better alerting options. Right now, we mostly rely on AWS Security Hub or CloudWatch for detailed alerts. Having more built-in, real-time notification directly from AWS Firewall Manager would make it easier to monitor policy violations without extra setup.

Read full review

reviewer2688339

Works

Vulnerability control saves audit costs and reduces expenses for organizations

Tufin Orchestration Suite is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendors. The analytics features of Tufin Orchestration Suite are challenging to use and require technical expertise, which is a concern as there is not much knowledge in this field in Thailand. The issue of technical knowledge, especially regarding English language proficiency, is significant for government and some companies, making Tufin Orchestration Suite harder to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the centrally managed rule. I also like the central orchestration."

"The product is highly reliable."

"The interface is intuitive and it is easy for the users."

"It has centralized cloud firewall management rules. It provides compliance in tracking and reporting."

"We work with compliance monitoring in the product, which is helpful for identifying framework-based misconfigurations, as it can tell you where to deploy firewall policies based on the frameworks."

"Overall, it improved our security posture and made audits much easier."

"It is helpful for our compliance, as the compliance manager manages compliance with leading industry standards such as FedRAMP, which my company complies with, GDPR laws, and ISO 27001."

"Once this solution is set up, we hardly have to touch it."

More AWS Firewall Manager pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it reduces both the time required and the number of errors when making changes."

"The automation piece is the most valuable feature: having SecureChange make the change on the firewalls, instead of my having to go manually make the changes on the vendor product."

"Tufin simplifies understanding network topology."

"The automation because it is saving a lot of work, time, and effort required to do all of our manual work. The change impact analysis is pretty good, and with the automation, it takes care of a lot of things which we would be doing manually."

"The most valuable feature is that it extends security entries in the firewall policies."

"SecureChange makes our lives easier with automation."

"All the basic functions work well."

"This solution has helped us to meet our compliance mandates. We implemented the Unified Security Policy (USP). This helped enforce what compliance requirements that we had. We have mitigated and remediated issues that have been brought forth due to that USP showing us issues."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pros

Cons

"This solution is suitable for a small-scale enterprise and may not scale up to a very high volume of traffic or a large number of servers."

"I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty."

"For AWS WAF, we have seen cases where it allowed suspicious HTTPS headers even if they carried malicious payloads."

"It needs to be more employee-friendly, and the security management could be more efficient."

"The system should be more customizable."

"One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option."

"The product could benefit from improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities."

"The areas of improvement are definitely platform resiliency, as we have seen outages on the AWS backbone, and whenever there is an outage on the AWS backbone, it impacts all the services hosted on that region, so we expect regional resiliency."

More AWS Firewall Manager cons

"The reports could be easier to read and more customizable. Also, capturing some of the different versions, and being able to dig through them could be a bit better."

"We would like to see automation metrics, from a reporting standpoint. We would also like to see automation of site-to-site VPN tunnels. We would like to see automation of Check Point application-based firewall rules."

"The policy browser has had trouble working. We have experienced bugs."

"The product that we have deployed for our main process gets bogged down in terms of its response. Maybe, we need to deploy a slightly smaller box. Eventually, we need to discuss this with Tufin is to see if we can move over to some sort of VM environment where we can add more processing power to it."

"We would like better communication on tickets, a better way to do metrics, and better communication to the customer. The biggest change that my team would like right now is communication on the process of the ticket, so the customer knows where their ticket is while their waiting."

"It would be better if they modernized the web GUI. The web interface GUI is simple and not complicated, but it's also too old."

"I feel that the user interface is a bit dated."

"Customizing it can be a little tricky, but that depends on your use cases."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly."

"The AWS Firewall Manager is a little on the costly side."

"It is a cost-efficient product."

"From what I've heard from my colleagues, it appears that the pricing is competitive, which influenced our decision to choose this option."

"It's quite an expensive solution."

"It's not that expensive, except for Security Groups. For us, just the Security Groups were about half of the total price. The total was about €500,000 a year, of which €200,000 was for Security Groups."

"Tufin and AlgoSec were pretty much in the competitive price range, but this one provided us better integration into the Check Point environment."

"Our evaluation showed that Tufin's features were on par with AlgoSec, but Tufin was the better financial choice."

"The solution has helped reduce the time it takes us to make changes. It helps make overall integrated changes immediately. It allows us to cut down at least a few hours in the week in regards to changes and monitoring."

"We've seen a decrease of about 50 percent in the overall time it takes to complete a firewall change."

"For us it's around $40,000 or so."

"It is expensive, but as compared to other players, it's more or less okay. Their pricing is not very transparent. This is my biggest point regarding Tufin. I've never seen a price list or something like that. It's always individual, and in many cases, it's very confusing to know what is the base and what is the price."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,732 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Hospitality Company

University

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	152

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Firewall Manager?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for AWS Firewall Manager has been straightforward. There is no separate licensing cost for AWS Firewall Manager itself. It is included with AWS...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Firewall Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager?

My main use case for AWS Firewall Manager is centrally managing and enforcing security policies across multiple AWS accounts. It helps me to ensure consistent WAF rules, security group policies, an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tufin SecureCloud?

Tufin Orchestration Suite ( /products/tufin-orchestration-suite-reviews ) is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tufin SecureCloud?

I have primarily used Skybox and AlgoSec ( /products/algosec-reviews ). I have also interacted with FireMon for compiling. However, I am not currently working with ACA, and I don't have any project...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tufin SecureCloud?

There is potential for improvement in explaining the analytics in the dashboard for Tufin Orchestration Suite. Tufin Orchestration Suite does provide good monitoring; however, interpreting the grap...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 31% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

AlgoSec vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 9% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS Firewall Manager Competitors

AlgoSec vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 31% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 30% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 4% of the time

Azure Firewall Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 1% of the time

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager

March 2026

Download AWS Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Tufin Orchestration Suite

February 2026

Download Tufin Orchestration Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tufin SecureCloud

Overview

AWS Firewall Manager is a security management service which allows you to centrally configure and manage firewall rules across your accounts and applications in AWS Organization. As new applications are created, Firewall Manager makes it easy to bring new applications and resources into compliance by enforcing a common set of security rules. Now you have a single service to build firewall rules, create security policies, and enforce them in a consistent, hierarchical manner across your entire infrastructure.

Using AWS Firewall Manager, you can easily roll out AWS WAF rules for your Application Load Balancers, API Gateways, and Amazon CloudFront distributions. Similarly, you can create AWS Shield Advanced protections for your Application Load Balancers, ELB Classic Load Balancers, Elastic IP Addresses and CloudFront distributions. Finally, with AWS Firewall Manager, you can enable security groups for your Amazon EC2 and ENI resource types in Amazon VPCs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines.

Tufin

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

March 2026

Free Report: AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,732 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.