AWS Firewall Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Tufin are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while Tufin is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.2% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Tufin’s 20.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tufin users who would recommend it.

AWS Firewall Manager

Read 11 AWS Firewall Manager reviews

988 Views
988 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Read 182 Tufin Orchestration Suite reviews

6,595 Views
5,936 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

AWS Firewall Manager

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Tufin Orchestration Suite and AWS Firewall Manager compete in the network security management category. Tufin Orchestration Suite seems to have the upper hand with its ability to manage multi-vendor environments and provide detailed policy analysis.

Features: Tufin Orchestration Suite includes SecureTrack for rule implementation and audit compliance, SecureChange for automated workflow management, and multi-vendor support for unified security management. It allows detailed network analysis supporting various firewall configurations. AWS Firewall Manager offers robust automation for policy management, easy integration within the AWS ecosystem, and cloud-native security features that simplify AWS resource protection.

Room for Improvement: Tufin Orchestration Suite could improve its topology visualization, expand support for additional security devices, and enhance third-party tool integration. Users express a need for a more user-friendly interface and flexible reporting options. AWS Firewall Manager would benefit from better documentation, expanded logging capabilities, and greater feature customization to enhance its functionality outside AWS environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tufin Orchestration Suite primarily deploys on-premises, supporting hybrid and private cloud setups, offering significant control but with complex deployment. Customer service is mostly praised, although experiences vary. AWS Firewall Manager is straightforward to deploy in public and hybrid cloud environments, ideal for AWS users, with generally well-regarded customer service, though improved non-AWS integration support is desired.

Pricing and ROI: Tufin Orchestration Suite is priced higher due to its extensive features, but it promises strong ROI through process simplification. Its complex licensing is based on device support. AWS Firewall Manager offers flexible cost governance but might be considered costly by some due to its pay-as-you-go model, yet it provides agility in cloud settings. Both tools enhance ROI by streamlining security operations, catering to different needs and scales.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,360 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

182

Ranking in other categories

AI Observability (78th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AWS Firewall Manager is 3.2%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tufin Orchestration Suite is 20.2%, down from 21.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tufin Orchestration Suite	20.2%
AWS Firewall Manager	3.2%
Other	76.6%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security policies have streamlined audits and ensure consistent protection by default

One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option. The compliance reports are helpful, but having more granular insights or export options would make it even easier to use during audits. Also, support for more third-party integration could improve flexibility. Another improvement I need to see is a smoother setup experience. Some of the initial configuration steps, especially around the organization and permissions, can feel complex. A more guided setup or clear UI explanation would make it easier for teams to adopt quickly. One more improvement would be better alerting options. Right now, we mostly rely on AWS Security Hub or CloudWatch for detailed alerts. Having more built-in, real-time notification directly from AWS Firewall Manager would make it easier to monitor policy violations without extra setup.

Read full review

reviewer2688339

Works

Vulnerability control saves audit costs and reduces expenses for organizations

Tufin Orchestration Suite is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendors. The analytics features of Tufin Orchestration Suite are challenging to use and require technical expertise, which is a concern as there is not much knowledge in this field in Thailand. The issue of technical knowledge, especially regarding English language proficiency, is significant for government and some companies, making Tufin Orchestration Suite harder to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has centralized cloud firewall management rules. It provides compliance in tracking and reporting."

"Overall, it improved our security posture and made audits much easier."

"We work with compliance monitoring in the product, which is helpful for identifying framework-based misconfigurations, as it can tell you where to deploy firewall policies based on the frameworks."

"Once this solution is set up, we hardly have to touch it."

"Also, the strength of the community is invaluable."

"AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."

"The most valuable feature is scaling, which allows you to deploy one configuration and scan and deploy it across the network. The automated policy application feature also streamlines security operations."

"The interface is intuitive and it is easy for the users."

More AWS Firewall Manager pros

"We've scaled it to hundreds of firewalls."

"This solution has helped us to meet our compliance mandates. We implemented the Unified Security Policy (USP). This helped enforce what compliance requirements that we had. We have mitigated and remediated issues that have been brought forth due to that USP showing us issues."

"The biggest benefit for us was the time frame to complete a ticket. It went from approximately a week and a half to two weeks down to about three days."

"The most valuable feature is alerting, which lets me know when someone has made a change."

"Tufin has made handling firewall rule request tickets more centralized and easier to manage."

"It's hard to pick the most valuable feature. All of them are valuable, they're all critical for us... ChangeTrack obviously has a lot of very good features, like the risk analysis, the USP, and the Policy Browser."

"We are able to discover firewall rules that are too broad and widen the security footprint."

"Overall, I would rate Tufin Orchestration Suite eight on a scale of one to ten."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pros

Cons

"The system should be more customizable."

"AWS Firewall Manager should be open to manage other third-party appliances as well."

"They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner"

"The product could benefit from improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities."

"One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option."

"It needs to be more employee-friendly, and the security management could be more efficient."

"For AWS WAF, we have seen cases where it allowed suspicious HTTPS headers even if they carried malicious payloads."

"The areas of improvement are definitely platform resiliency, as we have seen outages on the AWS backbone, and whenever there is an outage on the AWS backbone, it impacts all the services hosted on that region, so we expect regional resiliency."

More AWS Firewall Manager cons

"The key area for improvement is the integration to F5. One of the things that we encountered with another customer is that there were some limitations when we tried to migrate policies from F5 into Tufin."

"I needed more help getting the product to work in the lab."

"I would rate their reports as a four out of ten. I don't like the way that they are shown. It is too hard to export and send them to our clients."

"We were just talking to them about usage for the F5 platform. They will not be going after specific environments, but a more OpenAPI. They will have other companies write it, etc. It's a little different than I had expected."

"The change workflow process is getting better. I wish it was a little more customizable. Right now, my biggest issue is that it wants to optimize everything we put in. Sometimes, we need a rule to be more readable, and we want it to go in a specific way. Sometimes, it's difficult to get Tufin to accept that. It wants to optimize and reduce the number of ACLs. On the compliance side, sometimes you just want more ACLs, so it's more readable for an auditor."

"Currently, we have to get different data from different sections of the site. It would be nice if it was all combined into one."

"I wish there was a read-only admin option. I don't like that you have to be a full admin just to see the Network Topology Map. That option is great out there if you are a user, multi-domain user, etc. However, that piece is very helpful for us, but I also don't want to be handing out admin access to every single person so they can see that network tab."

"I would like the ability to export information in other formats including PDF, HTML, or Excel."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a cost-efficient product."

"The AWS Firewall Manager is a little on the costly side."

"From what I've heard from my colleagues, it appears that the pricing is competitive, which influenced our decision to choose this option."

"The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly."

"Tuffin is expensive, and we have to explain to our customers the benefit for them to purchase. If we explain the benefits in the correct way they do not mind the price. We typically do costing for the customer for three to five years. We make the general total cost of ownership at the beginning of a project for our customers."

"There is a permanent license for devices, but it's not relative to a device itself. Once you purchase 10 licenses for virtual appliances or virtual context, you can put them into different virtual firewalls, but you can reuse these licenses for other devices if you don't need them for the old ones."

"Pricing played a big part here... The customer had evaluated other products but, due to price as well as support, they chose Tufin."

"The solution has helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. With Tufin, it takes ten to 15 minutes. Before, it was 30 minutes or more."

"For us, the pricing was six out of ten, with ten being the most expensive and one being the cheapest."

"The additional piece, which we are buying and doesn't include our other solution, is close to 300,000."

"We are seeing ROI in terms of having SecureApp."

"I suggest talking with Tufin about the flexibility of the pricing structure."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Hospitality Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	152

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Firewall Manager?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for AWS Firewall Manager has been straightforward. There is no separate licensing cost for AWS Firewall Manager itself. It is included with AWS...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Firewall Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager?

My main use case for AWS Firewall Manager is centrally managing and enforcing security policies across multiple AWS accounts. It helps me to ensure consistent WAF rules, security group policies, an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tufin SecureCloud?

Tufin Orchestration Suite ( /products/tufin-orchestration-suite-reviews ) is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tufin SecureCloud?

I have primarily used Skybox and AlgoSec ( /products/algosec-reviews ). I have also interacted with FireMon for compiling. However, I am not currently working with ACA, and I don't have any project...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tufin SecureCloud?

There is potential for improvement in explaining the analytics in the dashboard for Tufin Orchestration Suite. Tufin Orchestration Suite does provide good monitoring; however, interpreting the grap...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 40% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

AlgoSec vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 9% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Firewall Manager Competitors

AlgoSec vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 33% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 31% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 12% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 3% of the time

FortiCNAPP vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 1% of the time

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager

January 2026

Download AWS Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Tufin Orchestration Suite

January 2026

Download Tufin Orchestration Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tufin SecureCloud

Overview

AWS Firewall Manager is a security management service which allows you to centrally configure and manage firewall rules across your accounts and applications in AWS Organization. As new applications are created, Firewall Manager makes it easy to bring new applications and resources into compliance by enforcing a common set of security rules. Now you have a single service to build firewall rules, create security policies, and enforce them in a consistent, hierarchical manner across your entire infrastructure.

Using AWS Firewall Manager, you can easily roll out AWS WAF rules for your Application Load Balancers, API Gateways, and Amazon CloudFront distributions. Similarly, you can create AWS Shield Advanced protections for your Application Load Balancers, ELB Classic Load Balancers, Elastic IP Addresses and CloudFront distributions. Finally, with AWS Firewall Manager, you can enable security groups for your Amazon EC2 and ENI resource types in Amazon VPCs.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines.

Tufin

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.