AWS Firewall Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Tufin are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.4, while Tufin is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 4.2% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Tufin’s 15.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tufin users who would recommend it.

AWS Firewall Manager

Read 11 AWS Firewall Manager reviews

1,435 Views
1,435 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Read 182 Tufin Orchestration Suite reviews

12,003 Views
9,002 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

AWS Firewall Manager

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Tufin Orchestration Suite and AWS Firewall Manager compete in the network security domain. Tufin stands out with its robust feature set and scalability, while AWS Firewall Manager excels in centralized policy management and seamless integration with AWS services.

Features: Tufin Orchestration Suite provides capabilities like change automation, policy management, and application awareness, offering significant improvements in rule management and compliance. AWS Firewall Manager excels in centralized policy management and automatic enforcement of policies across multiple accounts, integrating smoothly with AWS services like WAF and Shield, offering compliance monitoring and auto-remediation features.

Room for Improvement: Tufin needs better third-party integrations, improved reporting, enhanced topology handling, and a more simplified licensing model. AWS Firewall Manager could benefit from a simplified interface, better logging capabilities, and more granular compliance reporting, and third-party integration options to become more accessible and user-friendly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tufin Orchestration Suite supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, with mixed reviews on technical support due to slow escalation but praised collaboration with Israeli R&D teams. AWS Firewall Manager offers effective support, though it requires better documentation of its complex service ecosystem and is mainly deployed in public and hybrid clouds.

Pricing and ROI: Tufin Orchestration Suite is seen as expensive due to complex licensing, resulting in varied user opinions on cost-effectiveness, though its features drive significant ROI. AWS Firewall Manager is viewed as cost-effective with its pay-as-you-go model, integrated into AWS billing, providing good value through automation and security benefits, despite broader AWS licensing costs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,022 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

182

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AWS Firewall Manager is 4.2%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tufin Orchestration Suite is 15.3%, down from 22.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tufin Orchestration Suite	15.3%
AWS Firewall Manager	4.2%
Other	80.5%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security policies have streamlined audits and ensure consistent protection by default

One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option. The compliance reports are helpful, but having more granular insights or export options would make it even easier to use during audits. Also, support for more third-party integration could improve flexibility. Another improvement I need to see is a smoother setup experience. Some of the initial configuration steps, especially around the organization and permissions, can feel complex. A more guided setup or clear UI explanation would make it easier for teams to adopt quickly. One more improvement would be better alerting options. Right now, we mostly rely on AWS Security Hub or CloudWatch for detailed alerts. Having more built-in, real-time notification directly from AWS Firewall Manager would make it easier to monitor policy violations without extra setup.

Read full review

reviewer2688339

Works

Vulnerability control saves audit costs and reduces expenses for organizations

Tufin Orchestration Suite is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendors. The analytics features of Tufin Orchestration Suite are challenging to use and require technical expertise, which is a concern as there is not much knowledge in this field in Thailand. The issue of technical knowledge, especially regarding English language proficiency, is significant for government and some companies, making Tufin Orchestration Suite harder to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has centralized cloud firewall management rules. It provides compliance in tracking and reporting."

"The most valuable feature is scaling, which allows you to deploy one configuration and scan and deploy it across the network. The automated policy application feature also streamlines security operations."

"Also, the strength of the community is invaluable."

"The most valuable feature is the centrally managed rule. I also like the central orchestration."

"After implementing AWS Firewall Manager, we reduced our manual security configuration effort by around sixty to seventy percent as the policies are now centralized, managed, and automatically enforced."

"We work with compliance monitoring in the product, which is helpful for identifying framework-based misconfigurations, as it can tell you where to deploy firewall policies based on the frameworks."

"Overall, it improved our security posture and made audits much easier."

"It is helpful for our compliance, as the compliance manager manages compliance with leading industry standards such as FedRAMP, which my company complies with, GDPR laws, and ISO 27001."

More AWS Firewall Manager pros

"Tufin provides a very comprehensive solution and anyone looking to go down the path of automation should not look any further because Tufin will be able to meet their requirements and scale out really effectively."

"It can compare policy revisions side by side to see when you've made a change, and what the change is, and it also lists the detail of the objects and policies."

"Manually looking at the policies is very time-consuming, and with this product, I think we've streamlined the process tremendously."

"The clarity around the auditing provides the most value for us."

"We're using SecureTrack, and the most valuable feature for us is the accurate reporting it provides."

"I think it's a good solution to have."

"The workflows save time and speed up the authorization processes for applications."

"The solution is good, and no clients complained about it."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pros

Cons

"One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option."

"AWS Firewall Manager should be open to manage other third-party appliances as well."

"For AWS WAF, we have seen cases where it allowed suspicious HTTPS headers even if they carried malicious payloads."

"I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty."

"The areas of improvement are definitely platform resiliency, as we have seen outages on the AWS backbone, and whenever there is an outage on the AWS backbone, it impacts all the services hosted on that region, so we expect regional resiliency."

"The product could benefit from improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities."

"They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner"

"Enabling and configuring the logging is not that straightforward."

More AWS Firewall Manager cons

"Our biggest problem is that we have a very complex environment. It can get a little crazy when we throw it at the rule engine."

"A single central (master) database does not scale well past 1000 firewalls."

"I would like to see more about the cloud in the next release. They need a large plan to deploy the cloud into the solution and a way to implement it."

"I wish there was a read-only admin option. I don't like that you have to be a full admin just to see the Network Topology Map. That option is great out there if you are a user, multi-domain user, etc. However, that piece is very helpful for us, but I also don't want to be handing out admin access to every single person so they can see that network tab."

"It's still challenging in some cases to get it integrated with other systems."

"Currently, we have to get different data from different sections of the site. It would be nice if it was all combined into one."

"More API integration with third-party platforms is something that we would definitely like to see in upcoming releases."

"We had some issues initially with the initial reporting and alerting system."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly."

"It is a cost-efficient product."

"From what I've heard from my colleagues, it appears that the pricing is competitive, which influenced our decision to choose this option."

"I had a bad experience with the financial department, and the price is too high. The software does work and does the job. The solution is worth the money. If I had a different partner to implement the solution, it would have been worth the price."

"The solution has helped reduce the time it takes us to make changes. It helps make overall integrated changes immediately. It allows us to cut down at least a few hours in the week in regards to changes and monitoring."

"For us, the pricing was six out of ten, with ten being the most expensive and one being the cheapest."

"We have seen ROI in operational aspects, in terms of how long it takes to resolve incidences which arise."

"This solution helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. We used to spend up to an hour to do a change, and now, it's around five minutes."

"Our licensing fees are more than $100,000 USD per year."

"Pricing played a big part here... The customer had evaluated other products but, due to price as well as support, they chose Tufin."

"The licensing costs are around $250,000 to $300,000."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,022 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

University

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	153

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Firewall Manager?

The pricing is reasonable and follows a pay-as-you-go model, which makes it cost-effective for scaling the environment. There is no significant setup cost since the native AWS services and licensin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Firewall Manager?

AWS Firewall Manager could be improved with more granular policy customization for better visibility through enhanced dashboards and reporting. Simplifying the initial setup and providing clearer d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager?

My primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager is to centrally manage and enforce security policies across the multiple AWS accounts and resources within our organization. It helps to streamline the ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tufin SecureCloud?

Tufin Orchestration Suite ( /products/tufin-orchestration-suite-reviews ) is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tufin SecureCloud?

I have primarily used Skybox and AlgoSec ( /products/algosec-reviews ). I have also interacted with FireMon for compiling. However, I am not currently working with ACA, and I don't have any project...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tufin SecureCloud?

There is potential for improvement in explaining the analytics in the dashboard for Tufin Orchestration Suite. Tufin Orchestration Suite does provide good monitoring; however, interpreting the grap...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 14% of the time

AlgoSec vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Firewall Manager Competitors

AlgoSec vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 23% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 20% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Firewall Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 2% of the time

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager

September 2026

Download AWS Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Tufin Orchestration Suite

August 2026

Download Tufin Orchestration Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tufin SecureCloud

Overview

AWS Firewall Manager provides centralized security policy management across multiple AWS accounts, automating rule enforcement and enhancing compliance efforts seamlessly integrated with AWS services like WAF and Shield.

AWS Firewall Manager is designed for efficient security policy management, offering features like automatic rule enforcement and real-time compliance monitoring. The platform integrates with AWS services, assisting organizations in streamlining audits through centralized management and accurate analytics. Its built-in compliance dashboard and scalability features help reduce manual workloads and potential security misconfigurations, while community support aids in addressing challenges swiftly.

What are AWS Firewall Manager's standout features?

Centralized Policy Management: Streamlines rule enforcement across accounts.
Real-Time Compliance Monitoring: Tracks policy adherence seamlessly.
Auto-Remediation: Automatically addresses security issues.
Seamless Integration: Works well with AWS services like WAF and Shield.
Compliance Dashboard: Offers clarity and insights for audits.

What benefits and ROI should organizations evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces manual efforts and misconfigurations.
Streamlined Audits: Simplifies compliance checks and reporting.
Efficiency Across Accounts: Brings consistency to security rules.
Community Support: Provides quick solutions to challenges.

Industries with regulatory requirements often implement AWS Firewall Manager to manage security policies, ensuring consistent enforcement of WAF rules and protecting web applications from threats like SQL injection. It's crucial for environments needing compliance monitoring and regular updates, especially in sectors dealing with cloud infrastructure and file transfers.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Tufin Orchestration Suite offers change tracking, policy management, automation, and comprehensive visibility, aiding in secure and efficient network control. Its customization capabilities enable efficient rule analysis and optimization for multiple vendors.

With its robust capabilities, Tufin Orchestration Suite facilitates firewall policy management, automation, and compliance. Organizations benefit from its role in auditing, rule cleanup, policy standardization, and change tracking. While it provides efficient network orchestration, challenges such as dated interface design, incomplete cloud platform integration, and slow report generation demand attention. Security policy automation and vendor integration improvements are essential. Despite these issues, Tufin is crucial for managing multi-vendor environments and coordinating change management. Centralized management offers benefits in monitoring, reporting, risk assessment, role recertification, and network orchestration.

What are the key features of Tufin Orchestration Suite?

Change Tracking: Monitors network modifications to enhance security management.
Policy Management: Helps standardize and enforce security regulations effectively.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides detailed insights into network activities.
Automation: Streamlines tasks, reducing manual effort and potential errors.
Firewall Cleanup: Assists in identifying and removing redundant rules for optimal performance.
Compliance Auditing: Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements.
Report Generation: Offers insights and data for informed decision-making.
Customization: Supports user-specific needs for rule analysis and optimization.

What benefits can users expect from Tufin Orchestration Suite?

Enhanced Security: Improved control reduces vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Automation streamlines workflows and minimizes mistakes.
Multivendor Support: Facilitates integration across different firewall environments.
Cost Savings: Optimized processes and reduced manual labor lower operational costs.
User-Friendly Deployment: Simplifies integration and start-up processes.

In finance, Tufin integrates with existing systems to automate security policy management and ensure compliance, optimizing efficiency and risk management. In healthcare, it aids regulatory adherence and patient data protection, while in retail, it enhances security protocols amid a diverse vendor landscape.

Tufin

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

August 2026

Free Report: AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,022 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.