AWS Firewall Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Tufin are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Tufin is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.9% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Tufin’s 16.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tufin users who would recommend it.

AWS Firewall Manager

Read 11 AWS Firewall Manager reviews

1,336 Views
1,336 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Read 182 Tufin Orchestration Suite reviews

11,238 Views
8,766 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

AWS Firewall Manager

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Tufin Orchestration Suite and AWS Firewall Manager compete in the network security domain. Tufin stands out with its robust feature set and scalability, while AWS Firewall Manager excels in centralized policy management and seamless integration with AWS services.

Features: Tufin Orchestration Suite provides capabilities like change automation, policy management, and application awareness, offering significant improvements in rule management and compliance. AWS Firewall Manager excels in centralized policy management and automatic enforcement of policies across multiple accounts, integrating smoothly with AWS services like WAF and Shield, offering compliance monitoring and auto-remediation features.

Room for Improvement: Tufin needs better third-party integrations, improved reporting, enhanced topology handling, and a more simplified licensing model. AWS Firewall Manager could benefit from a simplified interface, better logging capabilities, and more granular compliance reporting, and third-party integration options to become more accessible and user-friendly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tufin Orchestration Suite supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, with mixed reviews on technical support due to slow escalation but praised collaboration with Israeli R&D teams. AWS Firewall Manager offers effective support, though it requires better documentation of its complex service ecosystem and is mainly deployed in public and hybrid clouds.

Pricing and ROI: Tufin Orchestration Suite is seen as expensive due to complex licensing, resulting in varied user opinions on cost-effectiveness, though its features drive significant ROI. AWS Firewall Manager is viewed as cost-effective with its pay-as-you-go model, integrated into AWS billing, providing good value through automation and security benefits, despite broader AWS licensing costs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,344 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tufin Orchestration Suite

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

182

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of AWS Firewall Manager is 3.9%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tufin Orchestration Suite is 16.1%, down from 22.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tufin Orchestration Suite	16.1%
AWS Firewall Manager	3.9%
Other	80.0%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security policies have streamlined audits and ensure consistent protection by default

One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option. The compliance reports are helpful, but having more granular insights or export options would make it even easier to use during audits. Also, support for more third-party integration could improve flexibility. Another improvement I need to see is a smoother setup experience. Some of the initial configuration steps, especially around the organization and permissions, can feel complex. A more guided setup or clear UI explanation would make it easier for teams to adopt quickly. One more improvement would be better alerting options. Right now, we mostly rely on AWS Security Hub or CloudWatch for detailed alerts. Having more built-in, real-time notification directly from AWS Firewall Manager would make it easier to monitor policy violations without extra setup.

Read full review

reviewer2688339

Works

Vulnerability control saves audit costs and reduces expenses for organizations

Tufin Orchestration Suite is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendors. The analytics features of Tufin Orchestration Suite are challenging to use and require technical expertise, which is a concern as there is not much knowledge in this field in Thailand. The issue of technical knowledge, especially regarding English language proficiency, is significant for government and some companies, making Tufin Orchestration Suite harder to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the centrally managed rule. I also like the central orchestration."

"The most valuable feature is scaling, which allows you to deploy one configuration and scan and deploy it across the network. The automated policy application feature also streamlines security operations."

"It has centralized cloud firewall management rules. It provides compliance in tracking and reporting."

"After implementing AWS Firewall Manager, we reduced our manual security configuration effort by around sixty to seventy percent as the policies are now centralized, managed, and automatically enforced."

"Overall, it improved our security posture and made audits much easier."

"The product is highly reliable."

"Once this solution is set up, we hardly have to touch it."

"My advice for anybody who is considering the AWS Firewall Manager is that it is pretty simple to set up and easy to use."

More AWS Firewall Manager pros

"The interface is quite user-friendly and intuitive."

"Tufin provides insights through various reporting capabilities, providing a level of insight into change that didn't exist before and giving us the ability to validate changes against business needs while also allowing us to automate certain functions."

"For what we are using it for, it does exactly what it is supposed to, and we don't have any issues with it."

"We use Tufin to clean up our firewall policies because it is so fast, as a report about compliance and the clean-up process used to take about one month before, but with Tufin it takes only one day."

"It provides a comprehensive overview of what our network looks like in terms of what is allowed and what is not, then how the traffic' is flowing with the Network Topology Map."

"The biggest benefit of this is that it allows us to see how security functions as a hole."

"The ability to compare the old policy and the new policies is real handy."

"Tufin is our audit trail for all changes, and we have to be PCI compliant, and it is the tool that we go to for enforcing PCI on the network side."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pros

Cons

"The areas of improvement are definitely platform resiliency, as we have seen outages on the AWS backbone, and whenever there is an outage on the AWS backbone, it impacts all the services hosted on that region, so we expect regional resiliency."

"One area for improvement is the reporting and customization option."

"For AWS WAF, we have seen cases where it allowed suspicious HTTPS headers even if they carried malicious payloads."

"This solution is suitable for a small-scale enterprise and may not scale up to a very high volume of traffic or a large number of servers."

"The product could benefit from improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities."

"It needs to be more employee-friendly, and the security management could be more efficient."

"I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty."

"AWS Firewall Manager should be open to manage other third-party appliances as well."

More AWS Firewall Manager cons

"Their pricing is too expensive, and I think they're one of the best products on the market but I think they can't get enough market share because of the pricing (the licensing)."

"Currently, we are able to monitor access rules and the operating system of a firewall. It would be great if we can also monitor the configuration of the firewall through Tufin."

"My suggestion would be to be able to correlate it with other toolsets, and not just have it contained in their own toolsets."

"For me, there are two things that can make Tufin a bit better... [It needs] a better focus on automation - automating a lot of the processes; and automating rule re-certification, or at least finding a way to simplify it."

"I would like easier integration with more automation."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of Tufin. It is using so many of my VM resources and yet it is still a bit slow... Even though we are allocating 130 gigs of RAM, we still have to wait for a few minutes for a single report to be generated. Otherwise it would be a perfect tool."

"The GUI is not really adaptable as you cannot configure it."

"I would like an improved reporting module which can be flexible (custom reports) and allow us to generate our own reports, because the data is already there."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From what I've heard from my colleagues, it appears that the pricing is competitive, which influenced our decision to choose this option."

"It is a cost-efficient product."

"The licensing is on a pay-as-you-go basis and we are billed monthly."

"We have seen ROI in operational aspects, in terms of how long it takes to resolve incidences which arise."

"Its price is reasonable, but it could be lower. It has been cost-effective for us. We have a contract for three years."

"This solution helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. We used to spend up to an hour to do a change, and now, it's around five minutes."

"The additional piece, which we are buying and doesn't include our other solution, is close to 300,000."

"The price of Tufin could be lower."

"We haven't purchased the license yet for SecureChange. We do have plans to buy it next year."

"There are ways to deploy the license to different types of firewall. However, if we decide to change the physical brand of the firewall, we need to go back to Tufin and modify the licensing. This is a hassle."

"The cost is pretty high. It's close to seven figures."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,344 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

University

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	153

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Firewall Manager?

The pricing is reasonable and follows a pay-as-you-go model, which makes it cost-effective for scaling the environment. There is no significant setup cost since the native AWS services and licensin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Firewall Manager?

AWS Firewall Manager could be improved with more granular policy customization for better visibility through enhanced dashboards and reporting. Simplifying the initial setup and providing clearer d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager?

My primary use case for AWS Firewall Manager is to centrally manage and enforce security policies across the multiple AWS accounts and resources within our organization. It helps to streamline the ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tufin SecureCloud?

Tufin Orchestration Suite ( /products/tufin-orchestration-suite-reviews ) is not commonly used in Thailand due to a lack of local support, and many customers are switching to AlgoSec or other vendo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tufin SecureCloud?

I have primarily used Skybox and AlgoSec ( /products/algosec-reviews ). I have also interacted with FireMon for compiling. However, I am not currently working with ACA, and I don't have any project...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tufin SecureCloud?

There is potential for improvement in explaining the analytics in the dashboard for Tufin Orchestration Suite. Tufin Orchestration Suite does provide good monitoring; however, interpreting the grap...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 16% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

AlgoSec vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs AWS Firewall Manager

Compared 8% of the time

More AWS Firewall Manager Competitors

AlgoSec vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 25% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 21% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 11% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Tufin Orchestration Suite

Compared 2% of the time

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager

August 2026

Download AWS Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Tufin Orchestration Suite

July 2026

Download Tufin Orchestration Suite product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tufin SecureCloud

Overview

AWS Firewall Manager provides centralized security policy management across multiple AWS accounts, automating rule enforcement and enhancing compliance efforts seamlessly integrated with AWS services like WAF and Shield.

AWS Firewall Manager is designed for efficient security policy management, offering features like automatic rule enforcement and real-time compliance monitoring. The platform integrates with AWS services, assisting organizations in streamlining audits through centralized management and accurate analytics. Its built-in compliance dashboard and scalability features help reduce manual workloads and potential security misconfigurations, while community support aids in addressing challenges swiftly.

What are AWS Firewall Manager's standout features?

Centralized Policy Management: Streamlines rule enforcement across accounts.
Real-Time Compliance Monitoring: Tracks policy adherence seamlessly.
Auto-Remediation: Automatically addresses security issues.
Seamless Integration: Works well with AWS services like WAF and Shield.
Compliance Dashboard: Offers clarity and insights for audits.

What benefits and ROI should organizations evaluate?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces manual efforts and misconfigurations.
Streamlined Audits: Simplifies compliance checks and reporting.
Efficiency Across Accounts: Brings consistency to security rules.
Community Support: Provides quick solutions to challenges.

Industries with regulatory requirements often implement AWS Firewall Manager to manage security policies, ensuring consistent enforcement of WAF rules and protecting web applications from threats like SQL injection. It's crucial for environments needing compliance monitoring and regular updates, especially in sectors dealing with cloud infrastructure and file transfers.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Tufin Orchestration Suite offers change tracking, policy management, automation, and comprehensive visibility, aiding in secure and efficient network control. Its customization capabilities enable efficient rule analysis and optimization for multiple vendors.

With its robust capabilities, Tufin Orchestration Suite facilitates firewall policy management, automation, and compliance. Organizations benefit from its role in auditing, rule cleanup, policy standardization, and change tracking. While it provides efficient network orchestration, challenges such as dated interface design, incomplete cloud platform integration, and slow report generation demand attention. Security policy automation and vendor integration improvements are essential. Despite these issues, Tufin is crucial for managing multi-vendor environments and coordinating change management. Centralized management offers benefits in monitoring, reporting, risk assessment, role recertification, and network orchestration.

What are the key features of Tufin Orchestration Suite?

Change Tracking: Monitors network modifications to enhance security management.
Policy Management: Helps standardize and enforce security regulations effectively.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides detailed insights into network activities.
Automation: Streamlines tasks, reducing manual effort and potential errors.
Firewall Cleanup: Assists in identifying and removing redundant rules for optimal performance.
Compliance Auditing: Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements.
Report Generation: Offers insights and data for informed decision-making.
Customization: Supports user-specific needs for rule analysis and optimization.

What benefits can users expect from Tufin Orchestration Suite?

Enhanced Security: Improved control reduces vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Automation streamlines workflows and minimizes mistakes.
Multivendor Support: Facilitates integration across different firewall environments.
Cost Savings: Optimized processes and reduced manual labor lower operational costs.
User-Friendly Deployment: Simplifies integration and start-up processes.

In finance, Tufin integrates with existing systems to automate security policy management and ensure compliance, optimizing efficiency and risk management. In healthcare, it aids regulatory adherence and patient data protection, while in retail, it enhances security protocols amid a diverse vendor landscape.

Tufin

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service

Buyer's Guide

AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

June 2026

Free Report: AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,344 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.