Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, and Fortinet FortiGate Cloud.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Palo Alto Networks Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Palo Alto Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
AlgoSec excels in network policy management with multi-vendor ecosystem integration. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers centralized firewall management with strong security features but less integration flexibility. AlgoSec appeals for cost-effectiveness, while Panorama is valued for performance despite higher costs.
AlgoSec has a straightforward setup process with a low initial cost, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama presents a more complex setup with higher upfront expenses.
AlgoSec has a straightforward setup process with a low initial cost, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama presents a more complex setup with higher upfront expenses.
Tufin Orchestration Suite excels in multi-vendor firewall rule management and compliance. In comparison, Panorama by Palo Alto Networks offers centralized management with ecosystem integration. Tufin provides pricing flexibility, while Panorama's advanced security features justify its higher initial cost.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers centralized administration and integration with other Fortinet products, ideal for cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama excels in large-scale deployments with advanced policy control, appealing to users prioritizing comprehensive security despite higher pricing.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud has a more straightforward and cost-effective setup process, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama incurs higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive feature set.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud has a more straightforward and cost-effective setup process, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama incurs higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive feature set.
FireMon Security Manager is ideal for robust firewall rule management and policy visibility, excelling in automation. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers centralized management with extensive integration, making it suitable for large deployments needing comprehensive security features.
Skybox Security Suite offers ease of deployment and competitive pricing, making it ideal for those prioritizing simplicity and ROI. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama provides advanced features and robust security policy management, appealing to those needing in-depth configuration and specialized support.
Skybox Security Suite offers a lower setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama presents a higher initial investment, highlighting clear differences in initial financial commitments.
Skybox Security Suite offers a lower setup cost, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama presents a higher initial investment, highlighting clear differences in initial financial commitments.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers extensive security management with ease of integration across firewalls; a tech buyer prioritizing automation and multi-location management may prefer it. In comparison, AWS Firewall Manager provides scalable automation and customization, appealing to those deeply integrated into AWS's ecosystem.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers comprehensive security controls and flexibility, suiting those prioritizing robust management. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager excels in scalability and integration with Azure services, appealing to cloud-focused strategies with potential cost efficiency for Microsoft ecosystem users.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama typically involves higher setup costs due to its robust functionalities, while Azure Firewall Manager offers a more budget-friendly setup option that appeals to cost-conscious users seeking essential firewall management.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama typically involves higher setup costs due to its robust functionalities, while Azure Firewall Manager offers a more budget-friendly setup option that appeals to cost-conscious users seeking essential firewall management.
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer attracts tech buyers with affordable pricing and efficient customer support, making it ideal for straightforward deployment. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama appeals for its advanced features and centralized management, providing value in complex environments despite higher setup costs.
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer offers a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks Panorama, making it a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, Panorama provides a robust feature set, justifying its higher initial expense.
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer offers a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks Panorama, making it a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, Panorama provides a robust feature set, justifying its higher initial expense.
Fortinet FortiPortal offers customizable dashboards and user-friendly reporting, appealing to those valuing cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama attracts buyers seeking advanced integration and threat intelligence, with its comprehensive features justifying higher costs for strategic value.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama excels in centralized security management and policy control, integrating seamlessly with its firewalls. In comparison, Cisco Defense Orchestrator supports multi-vendor environments with user-friendly dashboards, making it appealing for those needing flexible integration despite higher pricing.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Cisco Defense Orchestrator provides a more complex setup that could result in higher expenses.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Cisco Defense Orchestrator provides a more complex setup that could result in higher expenses.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama excels in comprehensive management and long-term ROI, attractive to organizations needing expansive control. In comparison, FortiGate CNF appeals to cloud-focused enterprises with strong cloud integration and initial cost-efficiency, making it ideal for rapid cloud-first strategies.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama has a more complex setup cost compared to FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall which offers a simpler, more flexible deployment option.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama has a more complex setup cost compared to FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall which offers a simpler, more flexible deployment option.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers centralized management with advanced automation and security features, ideal for enterprises needing detailed traffic monitoring. In comparison, Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center integrates well with other Cisco products, focusing on robust IPS and security intelligence integration.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama's setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its extensive capabilities, while Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, indicating a more straightforward deployment process.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama's setup cost is generally higher, reflecting its extensive capabilities, while Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, indicating a more straightforward deployment process.
