Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FortiGate Cloud-Native Fire...
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
8th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
89
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) is 1.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is 8.3%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewall Security Management
 

Featured Reviews

MuhammadJahangir - PeerSpot reviewer
Provided us with a good experience, making it the best firewall for our needs
We are using two Fortinet firewalls. One is as an office firewall for all users behind it, configured with remote VPN for users working from home. The other firewall is for production use, with our applications behind it, ensuring PCI DSS compliance. It is deployed in AWS Cloud FortiGate has…
Kim Ejby Lorentzen - PeerSpot reviewer
Unified firewall management streamlines operations across branches with prompt support services
The primary use case for this solution is the management of the entire firewall portfolio across various branches Palo Alto Networks Panorama has simplified management by providing a unified interface for firewall management and configuration. One of the key advantages of Palo Alto Networks…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to launch third-party software is one of the best features because of the variety of software available. For me, it's one of the best ones."
"ATP ( Advanced Threat Protection) next-generation firewall is the most valuable feature."
"The solution can scale well."
"The focus is on the comprehensive coverage of threats and the reliability of the chosen solution. Ease of use and familiarity are crucial."
"Support is excellent. There is local support through the distributor, which is efficient and provides a friendly relationship."
"The tool's documentation and online resources availability have been valuable."
"FortiGate's offering of many features in one license is cost-effective."
"The platform has good stability."
"The main value of Palo Alto Networks Panorama lies in its ability to centralize management, similar to FortiManager."
"Palo Alto Networks Panorama provides many features, such as alerts, traffic monitoring, and logs."
"The most valuable item is centralization and we can get all of the router bases in a single window."
"It has made our ROIs easier, but consolidating the correlation of data into one single point, which is pretty great."
"The interface is very easy to use. You can do most jobs from one single console."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Our team has the option to make configuration changes at any given time."
"The product was great, and whenever there was a bug or issue, they released updates quickly. Additionally, their support was very good."
 

Cons

"There could be more detailed descriptions regarding version upgrades, particularly in terms of the upgrade process."
"I'd like them to add a DNS option for FortiGate."
"The prices for FortiGate are way too high and are perceived as overpriced."
"We sometimes encounter issues with the SSL certificate."
"The solution is not stable in terms of switching."
"There are some bugs that need to be fixed, and they can take some time to resolve."
"For scalability, if the hardware isn't fit or working, the box needs changing."
"They should offer more affordable renewal options or flexible plans for license upgrades."
"The product could use some method of allowing for more customization and open integration with other controls."
"The solution is extremely expensive. You can integrate it with other Palo Alto products, however, it ends up being too much."
"Clients need to have an alarm and alert system from which they can forward the trigger. The product needs to improve its integration as well."
"There is room for improvement in the graphical user interface (GUI), which is becoming outdated, especially the NAT section."
"The configuration could be a bit better."
"There is a need to improve the upgrade process. When we are upgrading the solution we are facing some issues with Elasticsearch services. Every time we upgrade it takes a long time to become stable."
"An area for improvement would be the connectivity, which sometimes means logs can be slow to display."
"The integration between Strata Cloud Manager and Panorama could be enhanced to allow customers to stay on Panorama for many years while still utilizing Strata Cloud Manager for deployment."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FortiGate's price is really good."
"It is an expensive platform."
"FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall is not an expensive solution."
"The pricing is competitive."
"The tool's licensing costs are cheap and yearly."
"Although I don't have direct knowledge of the setup cost I believe it is mid-range."
"Pricing for Palo Alto Networks Panorama is always high. If you're going to sell the product, you always have to talk about the technology because it should be about the solution rather than the price."
"The price of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is high. There is a pay-per-use model."
"The price of the licenses could be lower. Still, because we have Panorama with 25 firewalls, Palo Alto gives us a good discount."
"There is a license required to use this solution and it is paid annually."
"Cost-wise, it's very expensive."
"Palo Alto Networks Panorama has so many licenses. For example, it has threat protection and group protection licenses. One license depends on another. I find it more expensive than Cisco."
"The licensing is not cheap. There are always hidden costs. You have support costs, or maybe you need to buy more optics on how the solution fits into the rest of your environment. It is possible some of the rest of your environment will need to change too."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Media Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
The most valuable aspect of Palo Alto Networks Panorama for me is the centralized management of multiple firewalls.
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
The solution requires more flexibility and quicker response times. High-speed replies are crucial. Additionally, the AI module should be on-premises, not in the cloud. It should support more flexib...
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.