Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FortiGate Cloud-Native Fire...
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
8th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
89
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) is 1.7%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is 8.1%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewall Security Management
 

Featured Reviews

MuhammadJahangir - PeerSpot reviewer
Provided us with a good experience, making it the best firewall for our needs
We are using two Fortinet firewalls. One is as an office firewall for all users behind it, configured with remote VPN for users working from home. The other firewall is for production use, with our applications behind it, ensuring PCI DSS compliance. It is deployed in AWS Cloud FortiGate has…
Kim Ejby Lorentzen - PeerSpot reviewer
Unified firewall management streamlines operations across branches with prompt support services
The primary use case for this solution is the management of the entire firewall portfolio across various branches Palo Alto Networks Panorama has simplified management by providing a unified interface for firewall management and configuration. One of the key advantages of Palo Alto Networks…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to launch third-party software is one of the best features because of the variety of software available. For me, it's one of the best ones."
"ATP ( Advanced Threat Protection) next-generation firewall is the most valuable feature."
"The solution is very advanced and has good monitoring features."
"The platform has good stability."
"Support is excellent. There is local support through the distributor, which is efficient and provides a friendly relationship."
"The tool's documentation and online resources availability have been valuable."
"FortiGate's offering of many features in one license is cost-effective."
"The solution can scale well."
"Everything about the reporting and everything about Palo Alto Networks Panorama is good."
"What's most valuable in Palo Alto Networks Panorama is that it allows us to see the status on the network side, particularly on the endpoint, because we also use it for the internal network."
"The most valuable features of Palo Alto Networks Panorama are centralized management. We can manage all our firewalls."
"The most valuable feature is WildFire."
"The most valuable item is centralization and we can get all of the router bases in a single window."
"The solution is suitable for all sized businesses."
"I find this solution valuable for full monitoring, centralized control for reporting, and centralized management."
"The solution is absolutely stable."
 

Cons

"The solution needs to improve on box clustering and IPS configuration."
"They should offer more affordable renewal options or flexible plans for license upgrades."
"For scalability, if the hardware isn't fit or working, the box needs changing."
"The prices for FortiGate are way too high and are perceived as overpriced."
"There are some bugs that need to be fixed, and they can take some time to resolve."
"The product is very expensive."
"There could be more detailed descriptions regarding version upgrades, particularly in terms of the upgrade process."
"We sometimes encounter issues with the SSL certificate."
"Its UI and usability could be improved. The way the UI looks could be improved to make it a little bit more intuitive. Other than that, it is a pretty simple product."
"The solution is extremely expensive. You can integrate it with other Palo Alto products, however, it ends up being too much."
"The pricing of the solution could be considered an area of improvement, as it is a comprehensive and feature-rich product that may include features that are not needed by some companies."
"There is always room for improvement in anything."
"The ease of use of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is an area for improvement. Another downside is that you need a lot of comprehension to understand what it is."
"In our version, there is no feature to transfer or upload a database of third-party vulnerabilities or signatures so that Panorama can convert them into its own database. This kind of feature might already have come in version 10."
"I am observing that whenever pushing our configurations sometimes the configuration will not push properly and then we have to go to the individual firewall and save it again."
"A potential improvement for Palo Alto Networks Panorama could be a more competitive pricing structure."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FortiGate's price is really good."
"It is an expensive platform."
"The tool's licensing costs are cheap and yearly."
"The pricing is competitive."
"FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall is not an expensive solution."
"The price of Palo Alto Networks Panorama could be lower."
"The product's pricing is high but flexible. It now follows the pay-per-use pricing model. I would rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."
"The pricing could be lower."
"Palo Alto is costly compared to Fortinet and Sophos."
"The solution is relatively cheap; I rate it four out of five for affordability."
"The solution is expensive and could be cheaper."
"My company pays for the licensing cost of Palo Alto Networks Panorama yearly, and it's all-inclusive, so there's no need to pay extra for some features."
"It is very affordable when compared to more expensive firewalls."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Media Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)?
The pricing of FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall is very good and is not considered expensive compared to other products.
What needs improvement with FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)?
I would be glad if there were free solutions to help manage migrations. Migration can be quite challenging when moving from a different firewall to FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall. Solutions like F...
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
The most valuable aspect of Palo Alto Networks Panorama for me is the centralized management of multiple firewalls.
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
The solution requires more flexibility and quicker response times. High-speed replies are crucial. Additionally, the AI module should be on-premises, not in the cloud. It should support more flexib...
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.