Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FortiGate Cloud-Native Fire...
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
8th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Ranking in Firewall Security Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
89
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) is 1.7%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is 8.1%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Firewall Security Management
 

Featured Reviews

MuhammadJahangir - PeerSpot reviewer
Provided us with a good experience, making it the best firewall for our needs
We are using two Fortinet firewalls. One is as an office firewall for all users behind it, configured with remote VPN for users working from home. The other firewall is for production use, with our applications behind it, ensuring PCI DSS compliance. It is deployed in AWS Cloud FortiGate has…
Kim Ejby Lorentzen - PeerSpot reviewer
Unified firewall management streamlines operations across branches with prompt support services
The primary use case for this solution is the management of the entire firewall portfolio across various branches Palo Alto Networks Panorama has simplified management by providing a unified interface for firewall management and configuration. One of the key advantages of Palo Alto Networks…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is very advanced and has good monitoring features."
"Unlike other products, the FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall has many features under one appliance."
"FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall provides the same features that higher-end models offer, but at a much lower cost."
"The people I work with appreciate the stability of FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF), as they love its reliability."
"The ability to launch third-party software is one of the best features because of the variety of software available. For me, it's one of the best ones."
"I have configured some SD-WAN features, and it's worked pretty well. It manages pretty well, connecting all links to the firewall. It can lower balance and traffic management."
"ATP ( Advanced Threat Protection) next-generation firewall is the most valuable feature."
"The solution can scale well."
"The interface is very easy to use. You can do most jobs from one single console."
"Panorama integrates security management by allowing easy modification of policy by account, IP, or application."
"It's a reliable solution."
"The product can scale."
"It has made our ROIs easier, but consolidating the correlation of data into one single point, which is pretty great."
"The main value of Palo Alto Networks Panorama lies in its ability to centralize management, similar to FortiManager."
"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Panorama is the simplicity of rule management. Both this device group and template management are very easy to use."
"I found logging and management features the most valuable in Palo Alto Networks Panorama. Another good feature of the product is that it lets you define global firewall policies and templates."
 

Cons

"There is room for improvement in terms of support."
"The solution needs to improve on box clustering and IPS configuration."
"The product is very expensive."
"I'd like them to add a DNS option for FortiGate."
"The prices for FortiGate are way too high and are perceived as overpriced."
"We sometimes encounter issues with the SSL certificate."
"There are some bugs that need to be fixed, and they can take some time to resolve."
"The deployment process is complex."
"The notification and alerting system could be improved."
"My pain point is the automation process is not well-documented. There are some things that they could improve on there."
"My company's getting whatever it needs from Palo Alto Networks Panorama, but in the cloud, there's an issue with CPU management, and that's an area for improvement. Though the normal data traffic doesn't go through the management interface, whenever there's an increase in the throughput, CPU management becomes high. If you increase the load, CPU management spikes, and it's what needs to be taken care of in Palo Alto Networks Panorama."
"It could be easier to manage. In the future, it should be much easier because it's not very easy to manage. So in the next release, I think it should be much easier to manage, especially in the first configuration. It could also be more stable."
"Storage in Palo Alto Networks Panorama needs improvement. My company also experienced deployment issues when the product was first installed, particularly when binding with the firewall. It's not as user-friendly because not everyone can deploy it without some knowledge."
"Palo Alto Networks Panorama currently lacks the capability of integrating with other software, such as AlgoSec to simplify rule management and schedule management. However, this feature has been requested by the company and it is uncertain if Palo Alto will implement it in the future. Additionally, the UI needs improvement, it is too slow."
"Instead of searching their knowledge base in their website, maybe they can interact with us in the user interface to explain things better."
"There is room for improvement in the graphical user interface (GUI), which is becoming outdated, especially the NAT section."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall is not an expensive solution."
"The pricing is competitive."
"It is an expensive platform."
"The tool's licensing costs are cheap and yearly."
"FortiGate's price is really good."
"The product's pricing is high but flexible. It now follows the pay-per-use pricing model. I would rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."
"It is very affordable when compared to more expensive firewalls."
"The solution is relatively cheap; I rate it four out of five for affordability."
"Pricing for Palo Alto Networks Panorama is always high. If you're going to sell the product, you always have to talk about the technology because it should be about the solution rather than the price."
"Palo Alto products are generally priced higher compared to their competitors."
"Everyone, I suppose, would like the price to be improved. Price is always a good thing to change."
"The licensing is not cheap. There are always hidden costs. You have support costs, or maybe you need to buy more optics on how the solution fits into the rest of your environment. It is possible some of the rest of your environment will need to change too."
"We're a reseller, and we're an MSSP. So, we get some extreme discounts."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Media Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)?
The pricing of FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall is very good and is not considered expensive compared to other products.
What needs improvement with FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)?
I would be glad if there were free solutions to help manage migrations. Migration can be quite challenging when moving from a different firewall to FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall. Solutions like F...
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
The most valuable aspect of Palo Alto Networks Panorama for me is the centralized management of multiple firewalls.
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
The solution requires more flexibility and quicker response times. High-speed replies are crucial. Additionally, the AI module should be on-premises, not in the cloud. It should support more flexib...
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.