Azure Firewall Manager vs FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) comparison

Microsoft and Fortinet are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.3, while Fortinet is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.1. Microsoft holds a 2.5% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Fortinet’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Azure Firewall Manager

Read 9 Azure Firewall Manager reviews

852 Views
503 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

FortiGate Cloud-Native Fire...

Read 17 FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) reviews

677 Views
677 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Firewall Manager

FortiGate Cloud-Native Fire...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Azure Firewall Manager and FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall are essential cloud-based firewall solutions catering to enterprises requiring robust security measures. FortiGate CNF seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced feature set and extensive security capabilities for complex network infrastructures.

Features: Azure Firewall Manager is integrated into the Azure ecosystem, providing centralized policy management, scalability, and ease of use within Azure environments. FortiGate CNF offers advanced threat protection, intrusion prevention, and deep application visibility, making it appealing to organizations that require deeper security insights.

Room for Improvement: Azure Firewall Manager could improve its flexibility outside the Azure ecosystem and expand its advanced feature offerings. It may benefit from better integration options with non-Azure platforms. FortiGate CNF could enhance its user interface for new users, improve the ease of integration with specific Azure services, and simplify its licensing model.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FortiGate CNF is praised for flexible deployment options across various cloud environments and strong support for hybrid cloud strategies. Azure Firewall Manager benefits from seamless deployment within Azure and offers quality Azure platform support. While FortiGate CNF has comprehensive support channels, Azure Firewall Manager excels in its platform-specific assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Azure Firewall Manager has a straightforward pricing model within the Azure platform, making it cost-effective for existing Azure clients with a strong ROI for enterprises fully invested in Azure services. FortiGate CNF, while potentially costlier initially, offers significant long-term ROI due to its extensive features, optimizing network security for businesses requiring sophisticated measures.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Firewall Manager vs. FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager vs. FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,899 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (26th)

FortiGate Cloud-Native Fire...

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of Azure Firewall Manager is 2.5%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) is 2.0%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)	2.0%
Azure Firewall Manager	2.5%
Other	95.5%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Sikkander Batcha

DevOps Engineer at CloudIQ

Has managed traffic effectively but lacks visibility and advanced control features

Azure Firewall is typically behind other vendor firewalls because we don't see what kind of traffic is traveling through it. That is one drawback. The main drawback is that we need log support from Azure Firewall, which can be quite costly. There is no login feature in Azure Firewall because only the IAM feature is available in the Azure site; we manage it only through the Azure portal, not through any other portal. Other vendors, such as Palo Alto, provide GUI or CLI interfaces to manage their firewalls, whereas we only manage Azure Firewall through the Azure portal. In the future, I would like to see additional features in Azure Firewall Manager to make it more competitive, such as technologies like App-ID and User-ID that Palo Alto has. Azure Firewall currently only allows traffic based on layer four and sometimes layer seven, so they need to improve in those areas compared to other vendors.

Read full review

Andrew_Jackson

Systems engineer at The IT Team (New Zealand)

Centralized management has streamlined access for staff and support has consistently addressed issues quickly

I see areas for improvement, particularly around the SSL VPN. It is a tool that we have used quite heavily, but it has a lot of vulnerabilities and they are starting to be dropping support for it. So we kind of see that they have left a vacuum by removing that feature. The VPN feature is indeed the main concern so far. Security around it is a concern, and then the fact that they have just dropped it and have not really provided a solution that fits for us. Their solution was either IPsec or ZTNA, which is not as flexible as the SSL VPN was for our customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"The solution has improved our organization with its firewall."

"From a traffic management perspective, it's a good firewall because it's automatically scalable based on the traffic availability."

"We are utilizing Azure Entra ID for group labeling, so Active Directory, or now it is Entra ID, securing our application for everyone who accesses it, and Azure Firewall Manager is definitely securing our projects and all its features are fine."

"From a traffic management perspective, it's a good firewall because it's automatically scalable based on the traffic availability."

"Azure Firewall Manager centralizes network security management with a hub and spoke architecture."

"It is easy to install and does not require any plugins for your browser."

More Azure Firewall Manager pros

"FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) is highly valued for its pricing, which is considered very affordable."

"I have configured some SD-WAN features, and it's worked pretty well. It manages pretty well, connecting all links to the firewall. It can lower balance and traffic management."

"The platform has good stability."

"FortiGate has provided us with a good experience, making it the best firewall for our needs."

"The people I work with appreciate the stability of FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF), as they love its reliability."

"FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall provides the same features that higher-end models offer, but at a much lower cost."

"Support is excellent. There is local support through the distributor, which is efficient and provides a friendly relationship."

"The solution can scale well."

More FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) pros

Cons

"The tool's security features need to improve. It needs also to include a monitoring system for logs. It is also complicated to find a query on the Azure firewall."

"The cost is a significant concern because we are in a region where the dollar is not our default currency, and converting to dollars makes it very expensive."

"Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling deployment, and traffic management, which leads to higher costs."

"The solution can improve the integration with open-source tools."

"The configuration and settings require substantial time for learning, particularly for new users. Improvements in ease of configuration would benefit users significantly."

"The configuration and settings require substantial time for learning, particularly for new users."

"There should be a simple one-click deployment for a firewall, rather than a set of setup instructions that include steps such as the DNS configuration, et cetera."

"Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling deployment, and traffic management, which leads to higher costs."

More Azure Firewall Manager cons

"The product is very expensive."

"I'd like them to add a DNS option for FortiGate."

"The solution needs to improve on box clustering and IPS configuration."

"The customization of FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) could be improved, particularly in terms of configurations to better adjust to specific needs."

"We sometimes encounter issues with the SSL certificate."

"The prices for FortiGate are way too high and are perceived as overpriced."

"They should offer more affordable renewal options or flexible plans for license upgrades."

"The prices for FortiGate are way too high and are perceived as overpriced."

More FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable but it is reasonable for the features."

"The solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services."

"FortiGate's price is really good."

"It is an expensive platform."

"The tool's licensing costs are cheap and yearly."

"FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing is competitive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

18%

Retailer

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Firewall Manager?

The most valuable feature of Azure Firewall Manager is the testing and configuration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Firewall Manager?

The pricing for Azure Firewall Manager is expensive. In our project, we have used both Palo Alto Firewall and Azure Firewall. Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling dep...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Firewall Manager?

See all answers

What do you like most about FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)?

The platform has good stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)?

The pricing is a bit expensive, primarily due to licensing fees. Extra expenses include upgradations beyond licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)?

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Firewall vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 17% of the time

AlgoSec vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 12% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 8% of the time

More Azure Firewall Manager Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)

Compared 29% of the time

Cisco Security Cloud Control vs FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)

Compared 19% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)

Compared 14% of the time

More FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager

January 2026

Download Azure Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)

January 2026

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) report

Download FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) product report

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Microsoft

Fortinet

Overview

Azure Firewall Manager is a security management service that provides central security policy and route management for cloud-based security perimeters.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) is a scalable, enterprise-grade cloud-native firewall delivered as a service, providing robust threat protection to cloud environments like AWS and Azure.

FortiGate CNF offers advanced capabilities like IPS, web filtering, and DNS security, managed through a single interface to secure multiple accounts and networks across various regions. It integrates seamlessly with cloud service provider tools for simplified management and policy enforcement, reducing operational costs and maintaining security efficiency. Customers benefit from comprehensive threat prevention without the need for complex infrastructure deployments, ensuring cloud workloads remain protected.

What features does FortiGate CNF offer?

Advanced Threat Protection: Guards against malware and data exfiltration.
Scalability: Automatically adapts to dynamic cloud demands.
Intrusion Prevention System (IPS): Stops threats before they impact cloud workloads.
Web Filtering: Blocks access to malicious websites.
DNS Security: Protects against malicious domain name activities.

What benefits can users expect?

Ease of Setup: Quick setup reduces time to deployment.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing security policies.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces infrastructure expenses.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with existing cloud tools for seamless operations.
Enhanced Security: Protects against evolving cyber threats with minimal administrative overhead.

Financial institutions, healthcare providers, and telecom companies deploy FortiGate CNF for robust cybersecurity across cloud environments. It supports compliance mandates like PCI DSS, enables zero trust policies for APIs, extends protection to high-bandwidth tasks, and integrates with on-premises infrastructure for comprehensive security strategies.

Fortinet

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager vs. FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)

December 2025

Free Report: Azure Firewall Manager vs. FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Firewall Manager vs. FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Firewall Manager vs. FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.