Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Azure Firewall Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, and Fortinet FortiGate Cloud.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Microsoft Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
AlgoSec offers automated policy change management and risk analysis, appealing to those seeking compliance tools. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager excels in integrated policy management and scalability, suitable for managing complex environments. AlgoSec provides cost-effective solutions, while Azure Firewall Manager ensures greater long-term ROI with seamless Azure integration.
AlgoSec offers an extensive setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall Manager presents a more budget-friendly initial investment. This notable difference can significantly influence the overall financial planning for organizations considering these network security management solutions.
AlgoSec offers an extensive setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall Manager presents a more budget-friendly initial investment. This notable difference can significantly influence the overall financial planning for organizations considering these network security management solutions.
Tufin Orchestration Suite excels in automated policy management and network visibility, supporting compliance and risk management. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager shines with cloud-native integration and centralized oversight, offering advanced threat protection, making it ideal for robust cloud security needs.
Tufin Orchestration Suite has higher setup costs compared to Azure Firewall Manager, making Tufin a pricier option upfront while Azure offers a more budget-friendly initiation.
Tufin Orchestration Suite has higher setup costs compared to Azure Firewall Manager, making Tufin a pricier option upfront while Azure offers a more budget-friendly initiation.
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud appeals to security-conscious organizations with its threat intelligence and network optimization, offering easy deployment and strong ROI. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager excels in integration with Azure services, centralized management, and extensive support, ideal for cloud-centric businesses.
FireMon Security Manager excels in policy automation and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager integrates seamlessly with Azure services and offers scalability. Buyers might choose FireMon for its affordability and insight or Azure for cloud-native features and integration.
Skybox Security Suite is chosen for its detailed risk management tools and integration, providing robust threat prevention. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager appeals with its seamless cloud-native integration and scalable policy management, catering to users familiar with Azure’s ecosystem and cloud-centric operations.
Skybox Security Suite has a lower setup cost compared to Azure Firewall Manager, offering a more economical initial investment. Azure Firewall Manager, however, provides extensive cloud integration features that justify its higher setup expenses.
Skybox Security Suite has a lower setup cost compared to Azure Firewall Manager, offering a more economical initial investment. Azure Firewall Manager, however, provides extensive cloud integration features that justify its higher setup expenses.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers comprehensive security controls and flexibility, suiting those prioritizing robust management. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager excels in scalability and integration with Azure services, appealing to cloud-focused strategies with potential cost efficiency for Microsoft ecosystem users.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama typically involves higher setup costs due to its robust functionalities, while Azure Firewall Manager offers a more budget-friendly setup option that appeals to cost-conscious users seeking essential firewall management.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama typically involves higher setup costs due to its robust functionalities, while Azure Firewall Manager offers a more budget-friendly setup option that appeals to cost-conscious users seeking essential firewall management.
AWS Firewall Manager offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Azure Firewall Manager requires a higher investment but includes integrated features that may offset the cost difference.
AWS Firewall Manager offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Azure Firewall Manager requires a higher investment but includes integrated features that may offset the cost difference.
Cisco Defense Orchestrator excels in pricing, integration with Cisco hardware, and customer support. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager stands out for its extensive cloud-native features and scalability within Azure environments, appealing to buyers focused on cloud-based security solutions.
Cisco Defense Orchestrator offers a lower setup cost compared to Azure Firewall Manager, making it a more economically appealing option for initial deployment. However, Azure Firewall Manager provides comprehensive management features that may justify its higher initial expense.
Cisco Defense Orchestrator offers a lower setup cost compared to Azure Firewall Manager, making it a more economically appealing option for initial deployment. However, Azure Firewall Manager provides comprehensive management features that may justify its higher initial expense.
Azure Firewall Manager involves a moderately high initial setup cost while FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting the cost-effective nature of FortiGate CNF compared to Azure Firewall Manager.
Azure Firewall Manager involves a moderately high initial setup cost while FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting the cost-effective nature of FortiGate CNF compared to Azure Firewall Manager.
