

Skybox Security Suite and Palo Alto Networks Panorama are strong competitors in the firewall management and network security category. Based on the evaluations, Palo Alto Networks Panorama has an edge with its superior application and threat visibility features and ease of policy implementation, making it more user-friendly and effective for centralized management.
Features: Skybox Security Suite offers robust Change Tracking, Access Analyzer, and Compliance. It stands out for its effective firewall management, network path analysis, and integration with third-party tools. Firewall Assurance and Vulnerability Control are key features. Panorama, on the other hand, excels in centralized management, threat intelligence, and comprehensive firewall management. Its application visibility and robust security features ensure high network visibility and ease of use.
Room for Improvement: Skybox Security Suite needs a web-based interface transition, better Change Management, and improved technical support. Its integration with vulnerability tools and scalability requires enhancement. Palo Alto Networks Panorama could benefit from a refined user interface, improved integration capabilities, and enhanced real-time traffic analysis. Configuration speed and dashboard presentation also need improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Skybox Security Suite supports hybrid cloud and on-premises environments with satisfactory technical support but faces some issues in handling complex problems. Palo Alto Networks Panorama is easier to set up with strong centralized management and responsive technical support, though it may face some setup complexity.
Pricing and ROI: Skybox Security Suite is perceived as cost-effective for large organizations, albeit with complex and expensive licensing. It offers significant ROI in large environments where its features optimize resources. Palo Alto Networks Panorama, though expensive, is justifiable by its feature integration and performance, offering high value with its comprehensive network visibility and control. It provides a strong ROI in extensive deployments but may be cost-prohibitive for smaller enterprises.
The technical support from Palo Alto is rated around nine out of ten.
The technical support by Palo Alto Networks is great because the response time is solid.
The tech support I've encountered has been good, prompt, and fast.
A significant issue was contacting support after hours on the weekends.
Scalability is primarily enhanced by Strata Cloud Manager as it is much easier to scale in the cloud than in an on-premises installation.
Scalability depends on whether it's a hardware or virtual machine model.
One issue I faced with scalability was the transition from Skybox Security Suite's 6500 platform to the 7500 series due to licensing costs becoming prohibitive.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is very stable.
In terms of operation, it is quite important that the staff managing the Panorama should be technically sound enough, and they should know exactly what they are doing.
The AI module should be on-premises, not in the cloud.
I would like to improve the dashboards on Palo Alto Networks Panorama, especially because I work in an environment where my managers are not really that technical.
Reporting could have been improved, and feature requests often were not implemented.
Only the licensing part of Skybox had an edge. We were not renewing the licenses of Skybox every year, but in the case of other tools, we would have to renew if we wanted to use those tools.
It would be better if something more attractive or similar useful information found in AlgoSec was available.
Virtual Panorama is well-priced and is sold every time there's a solution.
Commercially, compared to Fortinet, Palo Alto is more expensive.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is expensive but provides good value for money.
From a commercial perspective, AlgoSec is more expensive compared to Skybox Security Suite.
The pricing became prohibitive when transitioning between the 6500 and 7500 series models.
I find this solution valuable for full monitoring, centralized control for reporting, and centralized management.
We do not currently have a SIEM solution, so we are heavily relying on the monitoring features of Palo Alto Networks Panorama to conduct our investigations and log reviews.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama has positively impacted our organization by allowing a couple of network engineers to use Panorama simultaneously with different templates or device groups, which helps us save time and reduce the complexity of the network.
The tool successfully helped in preventing vulnerabilities and breaches.
Skybox Security Suite's network modeling and path analysis is a good feature when we need to check regarding the connectivity.
The most helpful feature is the firewall analyzer.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks Panorama | 7.0% |
| Skybox Security Suite | 9.0% |
| Other | 84.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
Panorama network security management provides static rules and dynamic security updates in an ever-changing threat landscape. Reduce administrator workload and improve your overall security posture with a single rule base for firewall, threat prevention, URL filtering, application awareness, user identification, file blocking and data filtering.
Skybox Security Suite provides comprehensive tools for network and firewall compliance, vulnerability management, and change management, with a focus on risk reduction and network optimization.
Skybox Security Suite supports over 130 vendors with massive scalability and seamless integration, notably with Nessus and Qualys. Its features include network path analysis and offline attack simulation, which enhance management effectiveness. Despite its robust offering, improvements are needed in its UI, web interface, reporting detail, and customization. Automation, orchestration, and device policy provisioning require better support, and integration with tools like Rapid7 could be improved. Enhancements in firewall configuration checks, cloud connectivity, pricing, and marketing awareness are also called for, alongside a transition from Java GUI to a consistent web-based system.
What Are Key Features of Skybox Security Suite?Skybox Security Suite is commonly used in industries requiring strict compliance like finance and healthcare. Firms employ it for firewall audits, enhancing network visibility, and managing configurations against standards such as PCI, ensuring security and policy compliance across expansive networks.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.