HPE Wireless WAN Reviews

Enterprise buyers evaluating HPE Wireless WAN will find diverse opinions on pricing. Some users describe costs as reasonable with competitive licensing agreements, while others consider the solution expensive, particularly when additional hardware is included. Licensing fees are often paid annually and contract-dependent, with some mentioning discounts through partnerships. Competitive alternatives include Huawei and Ubiquiti, though HPE offers potential project-based pricing advantages over Cisco. Overall sentiment varies based on feature requirements and budget considerations.

• "If you are concerned with your budget, then you can go for the cheaper model."
• "The license cost of the product falls under the category of a moderately priced tool."
• "The price is perfect for me."

Administrators use HPE Wireless WAN to connect LANs to central and branch offices, enabling seamless communication and uninterrupted roaming for video calls. It functions as an access point and backup, facilitating file sharing and updated network features. Organizations use it for wireless connectivity, security, and as part of networking solutions in sectors like government, healthcare, libraries, and retail. It integrates mobile devices in retail spaces and supports voice, video, and data requirements in ministries.

HPE Wireless WAN's customer service shows mixed feedback. Some found support responsive, quick, and knowledgeable, while others considered it average or needing improvement, particularly in speed. Packages like partner care and foundation care enhance assistance levels. Many rely on local HP partners, and organizations with trained engineers find direct Aruba support satisfactory. Several users did not contact support, indicating effectiveness, whereas others described it as appalling yet were satisfied with device replacements.

HPE Wireless WAN's initial setup varies in complexity. Some users find installation straightforward and quick, sometimes taking only minutes or hours, while others encounter challenges, especially with on-premises deployment. Experiences indicate that cloud-based setups offer simplicity with zero-touch provisioning and plug-and-play features. However, on-premises installations often require special training and can be time-consuming, taking weeks or even a month, especially when integrating with other systems or handling large infrastructures.

HPE Wireless WAN is generally recognized as scalable by many organizations. Some find it highly scalable with ratings of nine out of ten, supporting thousands of users and numerous locations. Others note that while scalability is good, there is room for improvement. A few have not yet tested its scalability extensively. Support from HP and partners aids in implementation, allowing companies to expand their network as needed within various capacities.

Users consistently describe HPE Wireless WAN as stable, reliable, and free from bugs or crashes. Many rate its reliability highly, although some note that stability can depend on the environment. Reports consistently mention no issues with crashes or freezes, showcasing scalability and performance. Some highlight concurrency advantages but mention limited stackability or clustering capabilities. Despite some variations in ratings, feedback strongly favors a stable and dependable experience with HPE Wireless WAN.