We use the product for enterprise-level monitoring, everything from application to database monitoring. The product will tell you everything. It will show you at the code level where the issue is. For example, the solution will analyze a database and it will tell you which of the CPUs are taking more time to execute, showing exactly where the issue is.
Senior Performance Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Fast and stable monitoring for effective issue resolution but needs networking monitoring functionality
Pros and Cons
- "The product is easy to install, it took about half an hour. The use and the configurations are simple as well."
- "The networking monitor function could be better, we are not getting many details from it."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
It has allowed us to find issues fast and resolve them.
What needs improvement?
It would be helpful to have a dashboard and artificial intelligence for error detection and correlation for future releases.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for six years.
Buyer's Guide
AppDynamics Database Monitoring
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about AppDynamics Database Monitoring. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is a stable product in my experience.
How are customer service and support?
Their support is really good.
How was the initial setup?
The setup was straightforward. It is easy to install, it took about half an hour.
What about the implementation team?
We deployed the solution ourselves. We used one technical person to analyze the solution for deployment but then we did not need any technical assistance afterwards, it is pretty straight forward to understand.
What was our ROI?
The networking monitor function could be better, we are not getting many details from it.
What other advice do I have?
It is easy to use and not difficult to configure. I would definitely recommend the solution, I have been working with it for the last five to six years. It's a really good product.
I rate AppDynamics Database Monitoring a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
A fantastic solution for monitoring a database
Pros and Cons
- "To be honest, it's a fantastic product."
- "The scalability could be improved."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution for database monitoring, application processing, and performance monitoring. Within our business unit, there are hundreds of people using this solution.
AppDynamics was implemented to help us with some performance issues. I'm not a big fan in terms of other features compared to some of the other tools that we use, but when it comes to end-user monitoring (where you want to capture or trend back business transactions, or where you want to really view the performance of the tools), It's not just good in terms of managing your production system, but some of the developers use it to tackle performance issues and get ahead.
What is most valuable?
The application performance monitoring when it comes to code (especially Java code), is really amazing.
The key feature of AppDynamics where it really helps us is instrumentation and database monitoring.
The user interface is also good.
What needs improvement?
The challenges that we face are all performance based, relating to business transactions, not database monitoring.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for a couple of years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
AppDynamics Database Monitoring is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability could be improved. There is a limitation in terms of the technology that can be supported. For Example, if you want to implement through Java, that is pretty seamless.
The amount of configuration you get there is actually quite low, so you can pretty much go ahead. However, if you're implementing C++ applications, I think it's going to be very difficult.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have an enterprise tooling team of our own. We actually don't support the product internally; however, there are some consultants from AppDynamics who join us from time to time to help us whenever we experience issues that we need help dealing with.
How was the initial setup?
The installation was quite straightforward. Simply deploy the agent to start coding the data to the controller, and it will do the rest.
Deployment took less than an hour or two. It's best to have the help of expert staff, but if you don't, just follow the instructions.
What about the implementation team?
We deployed this solution on our own with a maintenance team of eight to ten people.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution to other companies. On a scale from one to ten, I would give AppDynamics Database Monitoring a rating of eight. To be honest, it's a fantastic product.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
AppDynamics Database Monitoring
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about AppDynamics Database Monitoring. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
A good tool for application monitoring that is easy to configure, but can have stability issues
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature in this solution, for our business, is the clear way of projecting the connections between the database and the traffic inflow. This is very helpful when troubleshooting issues."
- "This product has an issue with initial lag upon opening that we would like to see improved."
What is our primary use case?
We are using this product for application monitoring.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature in this solution, for our business, is the clear way of projecting the connections between the database and the traffic inflow. This is very helpful when troubleshooting issues.
We have also found that including additional features into this solution is straightforward and easy to do.
What needs improvement?
This product has an issue with initial lag upon opening that we would like to see improved.
We would also like the capability to open multiple sessions of this product in a browser at the same time.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been working with this solution for two to three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have found the stability of this product to be an occasional issue during our time working with it.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have found this to be a scalable solution.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support team are quick, and respond immediately when we have raised issues. We have found them to be very knowledgeable whenever we have contacted them.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of this solution was fairly easy.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Consultant APM et Performance with 10,001+ employees
Good database monitoring and quite stable but needs more dashboards
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is very, very stable. We haven't faced any bugs or glitches on the system."
- "An improvement could be if the monitoring was able to be summarized into something more clear and simple for people who don't have the technical skills on the database side."
What is our primary use case?
What we do in general is analysis on the application side. When we have slow SQL requests we jump on the database monitoring to see, for example, the total time the request has been pending in the database. We can solve SQL requests by their pending time.
What is most valuable?
The explain plan is the solution's most valuable feature.
The database monitoring is quite simple.
What needs improvement?
An improvement could be if the monitoring was able to be summarized into something more clear and simple for people who don't have the technical skills on the database side.
The solution needs to have some prepared dashboards on the database. When we use AppDynamics we have a lot of screens and we have to jump from one screen to another. It would useful is if, on the database, monitoring required merely a click on a button and then you have the monitoring dashboard that you can display for easy access.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for three years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very, very stable. We haven't faced any bugs or glitches on the system.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution does not offer good scalability. It's quite technical, but basically, when we have to monitor one database we have to check if our Java program allows for the amount of monitoring we need. If it doesn't, we'll need to restart and get more database agents and perhaps spend more money to scale.
We don't have a lot of users on the solution on the database monitoring portion. It might be as many as 20 people. They are software engineers and database admins.
We only use the solution occasionally when we suspect there are problems on the database side. It isn't used daily.
How are customer service and technical support?
We create a lot of support tickets with AppDynamics. We've been using the solution for a few years now. The support is quite weak. There's a lot of back and forth, however, eventually, they give us decent solutions.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We didn't previously use a different solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very straightforward. It's not complex at all.
It only takes about 10 minutes to create the user on the database.
The initial setup is actually done in two parts. The first part is to create the user on the database that we want to monitor. This part is done by the database teams etc. The second part is handling the AppDynamics controller. This part is handled by me or someone on my team.
A company only needs one person to handle the maintenance once it is up and running.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the implementation ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I'm not in charge of licensing. I don't know what the costs associated with it would be.
What other advice do I have?
For me, the first recommendation I would have to other organizations considering implementation would be to have a person or people who have good skills on database monitoring. How AppDynamics works is basically just monitoring the metrics that already exist in the databases. These metrics are really technical metrics, so a company has to have some people that are really specialized in reading them. They need to have a good database administrator or database analyst in place.
I would rate the solution seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Technical Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Give the ability to monitor database performance but the solution has stability issues
Pros and Cons
- "The ability to identify the top running queries has been extremely valuable for us."
- "Stability-wise, we experienced some performance issues when upgrading from 4.4 to 4.5."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution to check how the database is performing and to log and check queries.
What is most valuable?
The ability to identify the top running queries has been extremely valuable for us.
What needs improvement?
The monitoring of different schemas within the database could be improved. They should split the dashboard into different schemas, instead of having one.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for three to four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability-wise, we experienced some performance issues when upgrading from 4.4 to 4.5.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is pretty easy to scale.
How are customer service and technical support?
I'm not too happy with technical support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We weren't previously using a different solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. It didn't take long; maybe about an hour.
What about the implementation team?
We used an Enterprise Console List for the deployment.
What other advice do I have?
We used an on-premises version of the solution.
I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. Technical support hasn't been too impressive so we ended up having to resolve our own issues. There are also a few challenges that we've had from a performance perspective when we upgraded from one version to the next.
That said, I would still recommend the solution.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Founder and CEO at www.ITJobZone.biz
The user experience management is a valuable feature
What is our primary use case?
AppDynamics allows users a complete application monitoring solution for making better products/applications.
How has it helped my organization?
It has definitely helped the trainees with using the tool in the best possible way for creating products and applications without any glitches or manageable glitches.
What is most valuable?
- Dashboard
- Reports
- Monitoring slow queries
- User experience management
- Business transaction breakdowns, and many more of its features.
What needs improvement?
- Synthetic monitoring of applications and products in a better way would help to improve the product better.
- More OOB reports also would help.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
QA Specialist at Vodacom Business
Scalable, stable, and good for monitoring transactions
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ability to discover and track transactions."
- "The user access management could be a bit better."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for monitoring the transactions of our user's in-app purchases.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ability to discover and track transactions.
What needs improvement?
We also use Oracle Fusion and the actual tracing of your transactions on Oracle Fusion is difficult because they use an asynchronous type of tracking between the nodes. It makes it difficult for AppDynamics to track.
The user access management could be a bit better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability has been good so far.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In terms of scalability, you may need a bit more resources in terms of hardware to scale the solution properly. The solution collects a lot of data, so you need a lot of capacity to handle it. However, if you are on the cloud, I believe there would be fewer restrictions.
We have 50 people on the solution and we use it every day.
How are customer service and technical support?
We've been very satisfied with technical support. Whenever we've had an issue they've been able to assist.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used DynaTrace, but we switched to AppDynamics because the pricing was much more reasonable. DynaTrace was also not easy to implement. We needed someone who knew about how to code it.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. Deployment took about half a day.
What about the implementation team?
We typically have a local supplier assist us with the implementation.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is very good. You get good value, especially if you compare it to DynaTrace.
What other advice do I have?
We currently use the on-premises deployment model but we are in the process of moving over to the cloud.
The solution is a good tool. I'd advise others to use the cloud deployment model so that you don't need to worry so much about having enough infrastructure if you you want to scale.
I'd rate it eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior IT Administrator at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The solution only monitors delays and needs more monitoring options
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is great for database monitoring. You don't have to install an agent on the database. You just install the server to a database agent. It's a good product for some database administration if you don't want to install an agent on the database for security."
- "The solution should add some monitoring similar to Oracle monitoring tools for databases. It has a lot of features to monitor SQL queries, and make some recommendation to resolve it. AppDynamics is just monitoring for delays and doesn't provide any recommendations for that. It's a deficiency."
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case of the solution is for end-to-end visibility for all applications we choose to monitor.
What is most valuable?
The solution is great for database monitoring. You don't have to install an agent on the database. You just install the server to a database agent. It's a good product for some database administration if you don't want to install an agent on the database for security. AppDynamics does not install directly on the database but can monitor core transactions.
If we have different applications with different language and databases from different vendors, or different versions, we are still able to monitor the performance and delay for all the applications and discover the root cause for delays.
What needs improvement?
The solution should add some monitoring similar to Oracle monitoring tools for databases. Oracle has a lot of features to monitor SQL queries, and make some recommendations to resolve them. AppDynamics is just monitoring for delays and doesn't provide any recommendations. It's a deficiency.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of the solution is very good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support from AppDynamics is excellent.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very easy. You do not have to install any agent for the database. You just take and install the server for database agents and it will take care of all the connections and transactions as well as the database. It makes for a very simple installation. We had four or five people that assisted in the implementation and currently, we have one engineer who performs ongoing maintenance.
What about the implementation team?
We had a consultant that assisted with the implementation.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Licensing for the solution is very complex. A different type of agent means a different type of license and subscription. Different languages, database types, and agents make a Dynamics license complex.
They do offer great discounts when bundling other AppDynamics licenses. For example, if a customer needs some license for a database agent, they can also take a license for end-user monitoring. I think AppDynamics has good options for budgets.
What other advice do I have?
We use the private cloud deployment model.
I would advise new users to not install AppDynamics for their database only. Just the database portion isn't dynamic enough without other portions of the AppDynamics suite.
I would rate all database applications nine out of ten, but I would rate just the database monitoring four out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AppDynamics Database Monitoring Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and ObservabilityPopular Comparisons
Azure Monitor
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
OpenText SiteScope
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management
InfoVista 5View NetFlow
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AppDynamics Database Monitoring Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Application Performance Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
- What solution would you recommend for monitoring traffic utilization of leased lines?
- How Much Should I Budget for an APM Solution?
- Which is the best AANPM product? Should we be considering anything besides for Riverbed?
- Who Uses APM?
- What is your favorite tool for Application Performance Monitoring?
- How does synthetic monitoring differ from real user monitoring?
- Differences between SiteScope and dynaTrace?
- Splunk as an Enterprise Class monitoring solution -- thoughts?