Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Logo

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros and cons

3.9 out of 5
476 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers seamless scalability and stability, catering well to diverse disaster recovery needs.
The initial setup process for AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is straightforward and easy to execute.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reduces time spent on managing infrastructure due to its managed service nature.
The instant block replication feature in AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is crucial for performing live block verification, ensuring high reliability for critical workloads.
It integrates smoothly with services like ACL, EKS, and Fargate, enhancing capabilities for deploying containerized applications.

CONS

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery lacks sufficient logging, leaving users dependent on vendor support for issue diagnosis.
A formal ticketing system is missing, hindering historical tracking of issues and resolutions.
Bandwidth usage is high, potentially impacting users with limited internet capacity.
Failback process is not intuitive, with reported issues in execution.
AWS pricing model improvement is needed to address concerns about high costs.
 

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Pros review quotes

Director6974 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 23, 2018
We went from an organization with minimal to no disaster recovery. I was able to spin up the disaster recovery environment with AWS rather quickly and meet business requirements.
Jonathan Pehau - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 9, 2023
The most valuable aspect of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is its instant block replication feature. This allows us to perform live block verification and eliminates the need to concern ourselves with recovery point objectives. This capability is particularly advantageous for critical workloads.
Vijay Londhe - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 22, 2025
Since it is a managed service, I reduce my time to manage infrastructure and applications.
Learn what your peers think about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer2248701 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 23, 2024
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution.
Olusegun Akinnola - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 27, 2025
It offers seamless integration with services like ACL, EKS, and Fargate for deploying containerized applications.
Miller Cortés - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 3, 2024
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a robust and reliable solution for disaster recovery needs.
EG
Apr 11, 2023
The setup is pretty straightforward.
RK
May 12, 2022
It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users.
SharePoi2b31 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 8, 2018
We have never had any issues with scalability.
Duy AnhMai - PeerSpot reviewer
May 30, 2024
The strong points are the stability and scalability of the solution, as well as the convenience of it being cloud-based.
 

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Cons review quotes

Director6974 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 23, 2018
The bandwidth is a constant upload communication to the AWS DR environment, so if you do not have the proper bandwidth, it will definitely eat up your internet line.
Jonathan Pehau - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 9, 2023
The failback could be improved. It should be more intuitive.
Vijay Londhe - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 22, 2025
Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status.
Learn what your peers think about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GlobalIn47b7 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 11, 2018
Definitely there should be better logging. From a customer perspective I would like to see more logs on what is happening. If there is an issue, I would like to know what the problem is. Right now, we have to depend on the support of the vendor to check and let us know, because we don't have access to a lot of logging information.
reviewer2248701 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 23, 2024
The solution's network setup and a lot of the control tower setup could be improved.
Olusegun Akinnola - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 27, 2025
An improved AWS pricing model is needed.
Miller Cortés - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 3, 2024
The product could be improved by incorporating more AI-driven automation for deployment and additional security features. These enhancements would make the solution even more user-friendly and secure.
EG
Apr 11, 2023
I set up a test, deleted the source, and went to fail it back, and it didn't work.
RK
May 12, 2022
I have not seen any areas that need improvement at this time.
SharePoi2b31 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 8, 2018
Sometimes a server will get a bit behind. ​