Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
DevOps Engineer at SEKAI
Real User
Easy to configure and stable solution
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to configure. It just takes a couple of minutes."
  • "There is room for improvement in pricing."

What is our primary use case?

For AWS WAF, currently, we use this new application. This is another service provided by AWS for the sales business, and it's used for education. So, AWS WAF works in conjunction with AWS Cognito.  We observe this when there's some kind of bot attempting to access our application or when you're trying to use a bot as a control mechanism to transcribe or manage a high volume of traffic through our endpoints. 

AWS WAF manages both human traffic and bot-controlled traffic, and it can redirect you to a catch-up mechanism or sometimes simply for use. So, we've implemented different kinds of mechanisms within AWS WAF.

How has it helped my organization?

We use it in the production environment. From time to time, we can see the metrics for the generated traffic on both the WAF and the infrastructure

These metrics are presented on the dashboard. We review this information and conclude that regular monitoring, along with dashboard evaluations, reaffirms the effectiveness of the system. This allows us to ensure that the investment we're making is justified and worthwhile.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to configure. It just takes a couple of minutes. 

What needs improvement?

There is room for improvement in pricing. 

The pricing for each rule group is a bit too high. It's a monthly subscription, and it can get quite expensive for rules that I won't use for my application. For example, I might create a rule group that costs $10, and I only use one of the rules in the group. That's $10 for a rule that I'm not even using! So, the pricing could be more flexible, or there could be a way to get discounts for unused rules.

So, AWS WAF should have a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where I can only pay for the rules that I use. 

Buyer's Guide
AWS WAF
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about AWS WAF. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for three years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable solution to some extent.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

For my use cases, it is a scalable solution. There are less than 2,000 end users using this solution in our organization.

How are customer service and support?

I reached out to support when I was setting it up initially, I had some questions. And we have some kind of first-line support with AWS. So I reached out to them whenever I had questions.

However, the support depends on the support we are paying for. The support we are paying for is cheap support. I'm on the standard support plan, so my SLA is four hours. There's a phone queue, so I can't always get through right away. But the support engineers are knowledgeable and can usually point me in the right direction. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is fairly easy. AWS does everything for us—just some clicks. 

What about the implementation team?

There is no maintenance required. AWS also upgrades new offerings. AWS does all these things. Like, it does why it's very expensive.  And they give us the metrics.

What other advice do I have?

Just evaluate these simple things you need. And don't try to put too many features at the beginning because you might not need them. Every application is designed differently. 

Every business and customer is also very different, so if your application is more susceptible to some kind of engineering traffic then it's going to be very expensive.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Akshit Malik - PeerSpot reviewer
Junior Associate - IT at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Can block sudden surges of users on the website and provides protection against DDoS attacks
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is the addition of managed tools that help us create customizable rules. In case we want to block a particular request, we can make use of those rules."
  • "One area that could be improved is the DDoS protection."

What is our primary use case?

We are using it to monitor the requests on our site, to block sudden surges of users on our website, and also to prevent DDoS attacks.

What is most valuable?

The addition of managed tools that help us create customizable rules. In case we want to block a particular request, we can make use of those rules.

What needs improvement?

One area that could be improved is the DDoS protection. We had a DDoS attack recently, and even though we had set a limit of 1,000 requests per five minutes, AWS WAF was not able to block all of the requests.  

AWS wasn't able to clarify all the DDoS attacks. It may have been due to a wrong configuration in the rules, but AWS didn't block all the requests.

For how long have I used the solution?

It's been deployed in a project for one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. It is a very stable solution. There are over 16 end users using the solution. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. There is room for improvement. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy. You don't need to do too many things. 

What about the implementation team?

The deployment was done manually on the console, there is no need of propriety.  It took around an hour and half. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing totally depends on the number of requests entering the WAF. For example, in case we have a DDoS type of attack, at that time, the price will surge quickly. For example, it will go up to two hundred dollars within three to four days. So it totally depends on the number of requests it is processing.

There are additional costs to the standard license because it totally depends on the number of incoming requests.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. 

I would recommend that understanding how the rules work exactly and finding patterns based on those rules is the most important thing in AWS WAF. It's quite easy to deploy at first, but afterward, it's essential to know how to handle it properly. Enabling the managed tools of AWS can sometimes block legitimate requests too. So, it's important to understand the type of requests you want to allow and how to configure the rules accordingly. It's quite an interesting aspect of AWS WAF.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
AWS WAF
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about AWS WAF. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
848,989 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Head of Digital Product Office at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
An excellent solution that's extremely scalable, very stable, and has great AI functionality
Pros and Cons
  • "The ability to take multiple data sets and match those data sets together is the solution's most valuable feature. The data lake that comes with it is very useful because that allows us to match data sets with different configurations that we wouldn't normally be able to match."
  • "The solution is cloud-based, and therefore the billing model that comes with it could be more intuitive, in my opinion. It's very easy to not fully understand how you tag things for billing and then you can quite easily run up a high bill without realizing it. The solution needs to be more intuitive around the tagging system, which enables the billing. Right now, I have a cloud architect that does that on our behalf and it isn't something that a business user could use because it still requires quite a lot of technical knowledge to do effectively."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution for its rich insights to improve customer experience.

What is most valuable?

The ability to take multiple data sets and match those data sets together is the solution's most valuable feature. The data lake that comes with it is very useful because that allows us to match data sets with different configurations that we wouldn't normally be able to match.

The AI functionality and the machine learning are very good.

What needs improvement?

The solution is cloud-based, and therefore the billing model that comes with it could be more intuitive, in my opinion. It's very easy to not fully understand how you tag things for billing and then you can quite easily run up a high bill without realizing it. The solution needs to be more intuitive around the tagging system, which enables the billing. Right now, I have a cloud architect that does that on our behalf and it isn't something that a business user could use because it still requires quite a lot of technical knowledge to do effectively.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for almost a year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is extremely scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

We have Amazon managed services, and, as part of our agreement, we have the lower end of that managed service. The solution is not a business-critical system for us, so we have a four hour SLA for resolution. That's pretty good. We're very satisfied with technical support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previous to this solution, we used Microsoft Azure.

Amazon allows you to provision more services once you have the initial platform in place. Using Amazon Marketplace, it's so simple to provide additional services and functionality so it allows you to grow the capability of the platform with very little integration into other systems because it's all built into the marketplace. With Azure, it's only capable of some products and they don't have APIs available to integrate as well as Amazon does. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. Deployment took about three months. For the setup of the platform, we had six people. For the maintenance of the platform, we now have three people maintaining it.

What about the implementation team?

We brought Amazon on to set everything up for us. They made implementation very easy. 

What other advice do I have?

We use the public cloud deployment model. We use the Amazon cloud.

From a technology perspective, Amazon is very simple. It requires, in order for it to run effectively, quite a mature cloud-based culture within your organization, however. My advice to others would be to get their operating model internally right before going ahead with the implementation.

I would rate the solution nine out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1953606 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Administrator at a media company with 51-200 employees
Reseller
Advanced security with effective OWASP filtering rules and easy connectivity
Pros and Cons
  • "They filter a lot of attacks out."
  • "Rule exclusion could be a bit more transparent."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case for AWS WAF involves securing applications for our customers, who are mainly software developers. Their application is positioned behind the firewall.

How has it helped my organization?

DDoS attacks are being blocked by AWS WAF, which is something some of my customers really need as they are targeted quite often.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is the OWASP filtering rules. They filter a lot of attacks out. Moreover, the service includes DDoS protection.

What needs improvement?

Rule exclusion could be a bit more transparent. However, it works great overall.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with AWS WAF for two years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

AWS WAF is stable. I have no complaints regarding its stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is easy to scale up AWS WAF. I would rate it an eight out of ten on the scale of scalability.

How are customer service and support?

I have never needed customer support for AWS WAF.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

The old team I worked at is still using Enable Insight remote monitoring, but personally, I am now using Datadog.

How was the initial setup?

AWS WAF is easy to connect, and I would rate the overall setup process as a seven since it's still a lot of work.

What about the implementation team?

I manage the AWS WAF for my clients and am responsible for the implementation.

What was our ROI?

The return on investment is difficult to determine. When a successful hack attempt is stopped, the investment is already returned.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The customers think AWS WAF is expensive. Compared to hardware solutions, it is slightly more expensive, but it includes extra services. Personally, I find it fairly priced.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not explicitly evaluate any alternate solutions for AWS WAF.

What other advice do I have?

If security is an issue and you want to be secure, you should use AWS WAF.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Group IT Manager at Civcns
Real User
Top 5
A highly stable product that provides a good interface and is easy to configure
Pros and Cons
  • "The interface is good."
  • "The price could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution to secure our public web server and run our document management process. We have service-oriented web servers and interactive web servers.

What is most valuable?

Custom rules are valuable to us. We have country-specific rules that we apply. The solution meets all our requirements. We never had a problem with the tool. The interface is good. We never had downtime. The solution does its job.

What needs improvement?

The price could be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for more than two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The tool is highly stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The tool is highly scalable. Almost all AWS products are highly scalable. I am the only user in my organization. The solution is running regularly. We check the logs whenever we have some issues. We do not include it in our security management system. It's a very small application. We use it to manage some documents.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy. The deployment took an hour. The setup and maintenance is easy. We do not face any issues with configuration.

What about the implementation team?

We deployed the solution in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution is reasonably priced.

What other advice do I have?

We never had DDoS attacks. We do not check logs deeply. The service is a very small portion of our application server. It is not a business-critical service. We check logs only when we have any performance or connectivity issues. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Aravindhan Suresh - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at Hippo Video
Real User
It is user-friendly and has documentation on how to use it; it is stable and has a simple setup
Pros and Cons
  • "What I like best about AWS WAF is that it's a simple tool, so I could understand the basics of AWS WAF in two to three hours."
  • "AWS WAF would be better if it uses AI or machine learning to detect a potential attack or a potential IP that creates an attack even before it happens. I want AWS WAF to capture the IP and automatically write the rule to automate the entire process."

What is our primary use case?

We faced many potential threats, such as hackers flooding in the requests, so we started using AWS WAF to block those IPs and stop those attacks. If multiple IPs are trying to attack our product, we'll also use AWS WAF by selecting the endpoints the hackers were attacking and then blocking those endpoints. Our cybersecurity team primarily uses AWS WAF.

What is most valuable?

What I like best about AWS WAF is that it's a simple tool, so I could understand the basics of AWS WAF in two to three hours. From the start, I know its purpose and its use case.

AWS WAF also has documentation. It's a user-friendly tool, and it's easy to know how to block the IPs and endpoints.

What needs improvement?

AWS WAF would be better if it uses AI or machine learning to detect a potential attack or a potential IP that creates an attack even before it happens. I want AWS WAF to capture the IP and automatically write the rule to automate the entire process. I want an AI feature in AWS WAF in the future.

For how long have I used the solution?

I only saw how AWS WAF works for seven months when the cybersecurity team used it, so my knowledge of the tool is basic. I'm not an expert on AWS WAF.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

AWS WAF is a stable product.

How are customer service and support?

I have yet to contact the AWS WAF technical support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

As the company is an Amazon customer, the company looked into what other Amazon services could prevent the attack and came across AWS WAF when the attack happened. The tool was also easy to use and could prevent attacks and safeguard the company's product, so the company decided to use AWS WAF.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup for AWS WAF was simple. It was a basic setup process, though I have no idea about deployment time.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

AWS WAF costs $5 monthly plus $1 for the rule. It's cheap, cost-wise. It's worth the money.

What other advice do I have?

AWS WAF has three users within the company.

If I were to advise you on using AWS WAF, I'd tell you first to understand how the attack is happening. For example, is it a single server attack or multiple servers or regions? It would be best to find out which target is being attacked. You need to know the basics before using AWS WAF. You also need to know the rules. You need to understand how to secure your endpoints. Users should have a basic understanding of AWS WAF and its purposes before using it. You need basic cybersecurity knowledge.

I'm new to cybersecurity, so AWS WAF is the first cybersecurity product I used and based on my experience and usage, it's a ten out of ten. AWS WAF is a user-friendly, on-point tool, and I could understand it easily.

My company is an Amazon customer.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1143783 - PeerSpot reviewer
Advisory and IT Transformation Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Helps secure applications, highly stable, and good support
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is the extra layer of security that I have when connecting to my web applications."
  • "AWS WAF could improve by making the overall management easier. Many people that have started working with AWS WAF do not have an easy time. They should make it easy to use."

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is the extra layer of security that I have when connecting to my web applications.

What needs improvement?

AWS WAF could improve by making the overall management easier. Many people that have started working with AWS WAF do not have an easy time. They should make it easy to use. 

The AWS WAF documentation sometimes is not clear and could improve for all levels of people using the solution, such as developers. The interface could be easier to use.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AWS WAF for approximately three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

AWS WAF is a highly stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have approximately 35 applications that are using the AWS WAF.

How are customer service and support?

The support from AWS WAF is good, I have used them often. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I was previously using Cisco and I switched to AWS WAF because I was working mostly with cloud environments and needed more services. Additionally, I have used Microsoft Azure.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is AWS WAF complex. The steps to complete the implementation could be easier, such as making the web traffic go through the WAF and then through the web service. The information for connectivity could be documented or done easier. The whole process can take approximately 20 minutes.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of AWS WAF is expensive if you do not know how to manage your software up or down. I price of the solution is average amongst the other competitors but it would be better if it was less expensive.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others is they should give AWS WAF a try. It works well, secures the applications, and it improves them against attacks.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Linux admin at Ameex Technologies
MSP
Top 5
A stable tool offering good performance and technical support while needing an easy setup phase to get started
Pros and Cons
  • "AWS WAF is a stable solution. The performance of the solution is very good."
  • "AWS WAF should provide better protection to its users, and the security features need to improve."

What is our primary use case?

AWS WAF is a tool we use in my company since we don't currently have a firewall. We can be safer if we have a firewall, and the receive protection side can avoid any vulnerability attacks.

What is most valuable?

AWS WAF is a firewall we use from time to time in my company.

What needs improvement?

I don't think any improvement is needed in AWS WAF.

As technology develops and grows, AWS WAF will have to improve as a product.

AWS WAF should provide better protection to its users, and the security features need to improve.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AWS WAF for six years. There is no specific version of the product since the vendor provides the services for the solution, and my company just uses it.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

AWS WAF is a stable solution. The performance of the solution is very good.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

My company doesn't rely on AWS WAF's scalability since it's a tool that is totally on the cloud. If the tool goes down by any chance, AWS provides the solution on the steps that need to be taken.

Around 30 employees in my company use AWS WAF.

The product is not extensively used in my company.

My company has no plans to increase the number of users of AWS WAF. If our client wants to increase the number of users, we need to act on the server.

How are customer service and support?

The solution's technical support is good.

How was the initial setup?

The product's setup phase was pretty easy.

Sharing the code files and database configurations are the two steps we follow for deploying the product.

What about the implementation team?

The product's setup phase was carried out in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

There are no separate licensing costs we pay for since it is included in the plan we purchase.

What other advice do I have?

AWS WAF has been releasing the product on a test-case basis.

It's always good to take precautionary methods for the production website. If everything goes fine, do work in your staging and UAT, not in the production part. The aforementioned details are the precautionary methods we have to follow.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AWS WAF Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AWS WAF Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.