Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS WAF vs F5 Advanced WAF comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS WAF
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
F5 Advanced WAF
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of AWS WAF is 13.8%, down from 15.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of F5 Advanced WAF is 11.8%, up from 10.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
 

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 24, 2024
A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks
We use AWS WAF to protect our application from different kinds of attacks. We use AWS WAF for retail customers Our retail application is vulnerable to a lot of bot attacks. AWS WAF helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection that happen within the retail industry. The…
YUSUF  TAIWO - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 26, 2023
Ensures a robust and unified security approach for our clients
My clients often seek a comprehensive security solution for their hybrid environments, with both cloud and on-premise web applications. To address this, I recommend combining F5 Advanced WAF for web application security with Fortinet solutions, including FortiGate, FortiSign, and FortiAnalyzer, for…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the way it blocks threats to external applications."
"The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is its highly configurable rules system."
"Its best feature is that it is on the cloud and does not require local hardware resources."
"The security firewall plus the features that protect against database injections or scripting,"
"The product's initial setup phase was very simple."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability because it automatically scales up or scales down as per our requirements."
"This is not a product that you need to install. You just use it."
"The most valuable features of AWS WAF are its cloud-native and on-demand."
"F5 Advanced WAF secures our connectivity and combines both the main functions of WAF (balancing and web application security)."
"It's scalable and very easy to manage."
"The solution uses AI to protect against botnet attacks."
"F5 Advanced WAF is a stable solution, we are satisfied. It is more stable than ForiWeb."
"I like the security features, especially against SQL injection."
"The solution's most valuable features include application DDoS protection, bot blocking, and HTTP header verifications."
"The most valuable features of F5 Advanced WAF are the security features and the protection."
"It can scale."
 

Cons

"We should be able to do proper whitelisting."
"I would like to be able to view a graphical deployment map in the user interface that will give me an overview of the configuration and help to determine whether I have missed any steps."
"The price could be improved."
"I would like to see it more tightly integrated with other AWS services."
"In a future release of this solution, I would like to see additional management features to make things simpler."
"They have to do more to improve, to innovate more features. They need to increase the security. It has to be more active in detecting threats."
"They should make the implementation process faster."
"The technical support does not respond to bugs in the coding of the product."
"The solution should include protection against web page attacks like what is available in FortiWeb."
"F5 Advanced WAF needs better integration within the application, like remote dashboards."
"One area for improvement in the product is its SSO integration, which posed challenges and required significant effort to resolve."
"There should be more ability to rate limit certain scenarios. The majority of the time, it is either on or off. For certain types of use cases, there should be the ability to rate limit, not just enable or disable."
"While F5 Advanced WAF does limit the number of partners in certain regions to ensure successful business transactions, they could also benefit from expanding their partnerships and making it easier for more people to learn about and become experts in F5 Advanced WAF. By doing so, they could increase the reach and exposure of their solution, similar to how Cisco has become widely recognized in the security industry."
"They could provide better pricing."
"I think the deployment templates can be better."
"The user interface (UI) seems a bit outdated. Making it more user-friendly would be beneficial."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is affordable."
"There are no separate licensing costs we pay for since it is included in the plan we purchase."
"There are different scale options available for WAF."
"The pricing should be more affordable, especially as it pertains to small clients."
"AWS is not that costly by comparison. They are maybe close to $40 per month. I think it was between $29 or $39."
"The solution's cost depends on the use cases."
"It's an annual subscription."
"For our infrastructure, we probably pay around $16,000 per month for AWS WAF. Because alternative WAF solutions provide even more features, I think the AWS WAF is a bit pricey"
"F5 Advanced WAF is not a cost-effective solution. Although they are attempting to reduce prices with their VE and cloud options, they are more expensive than other solutions. The solution is more expensive on average."
"I think the price is very high."
"After buying the program, you just pay for the support every year."
"Licensing fees for this solution are paid on a yearly basis."
"Its price is fair. We have done a couple of deals where they were able to give some kind of discount to the customers. The price was initially high for the customers, but after a couple of negotiations, it came within their budget. They were happy with that."
"The price of the solution is reasonable when compared with other products, such as FortiWeb. I am very satisfied with the price."
"Pricing for this solution is higher than average."
"The cost is slightly above average."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
814,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
5%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What are the limitations of AWS WAF vs alternative WAFs?
Hi Varun, I have had experienced with several WAF deployments and deep technical assessments of the following: 1. Imperva WAF 2. F5 WAF 3. Polarisec Cloud WAF Typical limitations on cloud WAF is t...
How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...
What do you like most about AWS WAF?
The most valuable feature of AWS WAF is its highly configurable rules system.
What do you like most about F5 Advanced WAF?
It's a fairly easy-to-use and user-friendly tool. My administrators and team also like its ability to customize the rules per the requirements.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 Advanced WAF?
I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten. Sometimes, for specific models, additional licenses over the standard one need to be purchased. F5 Advanced WAF doesn't offer a single license that fit...
What needs improvement with F5 Advanced WAF?
More legacy protocols should be added to the solution. The aforementioned protocols are generally less used and might have been phased out from multiple solutions. But some of the large corporation...
 

Also Known As

AWS Web Application Firewall
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

eVitamins, 9Splay, Senao International
MAXIMUS, Vivo, American Systems, Bangladesh Post Office, City Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS WAF vs. F5 Advanced WAF and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.