Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BlazeMeter pros and cons

Vendor: Perforce

4.1 out of 5

47 reviews
93% willing to recommend

1,859 followers

BlazeMeter Pros review quotes

Mobile Network Automation Architect at BT - British Telecom

Jul 17, 2022

The on-the-fly test data improved our testing productivity a lot. The new test data features changed how we test the applications because there are different things we can do. We can use mock data or real data. We can also build data based on different formats.

Read full review

Senior Product Owner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Sep 18, 2022

It's a great platform because it's a SaaS solution, but it also builds the on-premises hosting solutions, so we have implemented a hybrid approach. BlazeMeter sets us up for our traditional hosting platforms and application stack as well as the modern cloud-based or SaaS-based application technologies.

Read full review

VA

Service Virtualization Developer at Tata Consultancy Services

Jan 25, 2024

With the help of the Mock Services, we are overcoming everything. Wherever we are facing issues, whether they will be long term or temporary, by implementing the Mock Services we can bypass the faulty components that are not needed for our particular testing.

Read full review

Free Report: BlazeMeter Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about BlazeMeter. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quality Assurance Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Aug 3, 2022

The orchestration feature is the most valuable. It's like the tourist backend component of BlazeMeter. It allows me to essentially give BlazeMeter multiple JMeter scripts and a YAML file, and it will orchestrate and execute that load test and all those scripts as I define them.

Read full review

reviewer1511478

QA Automation & Perform Lead (C) at Canadian Tire

Jul 15, 2022

Using cloud-based load generators is highly valuable to us, as we can test from outside our network and increase load generation without having to upscale our hardware as much. The cloud load generator is there when we need it and is the feature we leverage the most.

Read full review

SY

QA Automation Engineer with 201-500 employees

May 22, 2022

The feature that stands out the most is their action groups. They act like functions or methods and code, allowing us to reuse portions of our tests. That also means we have a single point for maintenance when updates are required. Instead of updating a hundred different test cases, we update one action group, and the test cases using that action group will update.

Read full review

Robinson Caiado Guimarães

Sales Leader at Better Now

Jul 28, 2022

One thing that we are doing a lot with the solution, and it's very good, is orchestrating a lot of JMeter agents. This feature has helped us a lot because we can reuse other vendors' performance scripts that they have used with JMeter before.

Read full review

Vikram Vallabhineni

Senior Performance tester at CS

Jan 10, 2024

The product's initial setup phase was simple.

Read full review

reviewer1246755

Performance Architect at ValueLabs

Jun 7, 2024

Running from the cloud with load distribution, exhibiting load from different geo-regions. Generating the load from different cloud regions is the best feature.

Read full review

SG

Shivakumar_Gutte

Senior Manager at 360logica Software Testing Services

Feb 21, 2024

In our company, various teams use BlazeMeter, particularly appreciating its cloud license software, which supports up to 5,000 users. BlazeMeter's cloud capabilities allow us to load test or simulate traffic from any location worldwide, such as Europe, North America, South America, Australia, and even specific cities like Delhi. So, with one cloud license, we can simulate user load from various locations globally.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 34)

BlazeMeter Cons review quotes

Mobile Network Automation Architect at BT - British Telecom

Jul 17, 2022

Version controlling of the test cases and the information, the ability to compare the current version and the previous version within Runscope would be really nice. The history shows who made the changes, but it doesn't compare the changes.

Read full review

Senior Product Owner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Sep 18, 2022

The seamless integration with mobiles could be improved.

Read full review

VA

Service Virtualization Developer at Tata Consultancy Services

Jan 25, 2024

One problem, while we are executing a test, is that it will take some time to download data. Let's say I'm performance testing with a high-end load configuration. It takes a minimum of three minutes or so to start the test itself. That's the bad part of the performance testing... every time I rerun the same test, it is downloaded again... That means I have to wait for three to four minutes again.

Read full review

Free Report: BlazeMeter Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about BlazeMeter. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quality Assurance Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Aug 3, 2022

BlazeMeter needs more granular access control. Currently, BlazeMeter controls everything at a workspace level, so a user can view or modify anything inside that workspace depending on their role. It would be nice if there was a more granular control where you could say, "This person can only do A, B, and C," or, "This user only has access to functional testing. This user only has access to mock services." That feature set doesn't currently exist.

Read full review

reviewer1511478

QA Automation & Perform Lead (C) at Canadian Tire

Jul 15, 2022

We encountered some minor bugs, and I would like to have the ability to add load generators to workspaces without having to use APIs. We can't do that now, so we're beholden to the APIs.

Read full review

SY

QA Automation Engineer with 201-500 employees

May 22, 2022

The performance could be better. When reviewing finished cases, it sometimes takes a while for BlazeMeter to load. That has improved recently, but it's still a problem with unusually large test cases. The same goes for editing test cases. When editing test cases, it starts to take a long time to open those action groups and stuff.

Read full review

Robinson Caiado Guimarães

Sales Leader at Better Now

Jul 28, 2022

I believe that data management and test server virtualization are things that Perforce is working on, or should be working on.

Read full review

Vikram Vallabhineni

Senior Performance tester at CS

Jan 10, 2024

From a performance perspective, BlazeMeter needs to be improved...BlazeMeter has not found the extensions for WebSockets or Java Applet.

Read full review

reviewer1246755

Performance Architect at ValueLabs

Jun 7, 2024

Sometimes, when we execute tests, the results calculated by BlazeMeter, specifically the response times for failed transactions, are incorrect.

Read full review

SG

Shivakumar_Gutte

Senior Manager at 360logica Software Testing Services

Feb 21, 2024

Integration is one of the things lacking in BlazeMeter compared to some newer options.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 34)

Related questions

255

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

19

When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

19

SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?

8

Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?

72

What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?

63

What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?

4

When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

495

Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?

557

Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?

192

Specflow vs Selenium