Cambium Networks Wireless LAN Reviews

They all have controllers built in, and we manage them all with a web-based management tool.

Obviously, one of the reasons we're getting ready to upgrade the equipment is that it's five years old. 

Our areas for improvement would be a refresh with the most recent technology available. 

When we look at this, we will look at all vendors, not just Cambium, but I am not sure if we will stay with them, but in general, they work pretty well, and it is simple to manage.

It would be nice if it were a little less expensive, but their prices are comparable to others.

We are currently primarily using Xirrus. Cambium has recently acquired Xirrus.

It is still known as Xirrus, but Cambium Networks now owns it.

We are preparing to issue an RFP for an upgrade.

The stability of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is good.

We have been using them with the current generation for over five years. 

We had Xirrus in here before that as well; we have been using Xirrus since, 2010, I believe. That is equivalent to 12 years.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is a scalable solution.

They enable a high level of connectivity. 

Sometimes we have to make adjustments because a room's purpose changes over time. 

We have had to rearrange things a little bit, but obviously, we are looking into the future and hoping to leverage things like Wi-Fi 6E.

The technical support is great.

Tech support has been excellent, despite the fact that they have been sold a few times. Since we have been with Xirrus, their product has been sold a few times. 

Cambium was not the first.

Technical support has changed. 

The Xirrus team has remained committed to their product's support team. 

They are very knowledgeable and communicate effectively. They are on time. 

We have had to army a few units, but replacements arrived within a few days. 

They have excellent support.

Pricing is reasonable. None of this wireless equipment is cheap, at least not on an enterprise level. 

In general, the way we purchased it was we purchased it at the beginning, was with five years of support, once our initial cost was met, we didn't have to pay for anything else.

I would consider them.

Previously, we were more of a Cisco shop, using controllers and, I don't know, just the ability to have all of these units stand alone on their own and have their own controllers built in, and they have really good coverage and are easy to manage.

I know there are two schools of thought. The first option is to get a cheap access point and then spend a lot of money on a controller. They are kind of dumb access points that are controlled, and in this case, it is the opposite, where you have a smart access point and a very low-cost control.

Now that it's web-based, there is a management subscription, which we bought for about five years. Once the five years are up, I guess we will have to start paying for it. I honestly don't know what that is, but based on what we saw, it seems reasonable. Let's see what happens.

I would recommend that people look into smart access points because they are great.

I would rate Cambium Networks Wireless LAN an eight out of ten. I am pretty happy with it.

In the context of wireless LAN (Wi-Fi) deployments for enterprise use, the process typically begins with identifying specific areas within a building where wireless access points, often referred to as hotspots, are needed. The client provides information regarding the locations of these hotspots. As a network designer and implementer, my role involves creating a design plan for the wireless network. I use a combination of RF tools and physical networking tools to develop a comprehensive plan. This plan includes determining the required quantity of access points (APs), switches, cable lengths, and router specifications, and identifying entrance points for cabling. Once the design is complete and all the necessary equipment details are specified, we communicate with the client to discuss the plan.

It offers features that are essential for an efficient and high-performance wireless LAN deployment, where capacity, coverage, and quality are optimized, and frequency bands are selected based on the specific needs of the network.

The goal is to use fewer antennas while maintaining coverage and capacity. This approach is not only practical but also cost-effective as installing numerous access points in a room or facility can be expensive. We would appreciate it if it allowed us to optimize the number of access points while still providing customers with the same level of coverage, capacity, and quality. The solution should be scalable, offering better pricing options as we optimize the network for coverage, capacity, and quality.

I have been working with it for nine years.

It provides good stability features. I would rate it eight out of ten.

It is highly scalable. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Based on the feedback I've received, there's always someone ready to respond globally, regardless of the time zone, to address any issues or take your calls when needed.

Initially, I worked with Aruba, then moved on to Ruckus, and now I'm employing Cambium Networks for my current project. The choice between these manufacturers ultimately hinges on our ability to maintain high-quality service at a reasonable price.

The setup can be quite variable, typically tailored to each unique situation. We have straightforward installations in simple buildings where automation streamlines the process. However, when customers require more extensive coverage, spanning multiple floors, it becomes a bit more complex, hovering in the midrange of complexity. The real challenge isn't necessarily placing the access points (APs) but rather wiring them properly.

Implementing around four to five antennas typically takes a full day or night, not just an eight-hour workday. This is because the process involves thorough planning, ensuring proper cable bending, avoiding damage, and drilling, among other tasks. It's a meticulous job that requires a team of at least three people and can involve up to seven, depending on the speed and the size of the area being covered.

I would place it in the mid-range market segment, balancing affordability and profitability. While we prioritize offering competitive prices, it's essential to emphasize that maintaining top-notch quality remains our utmost priority, with no compromises.

It provides a comprehensive set of solutions, including point-to-point and point-to-multipoint setups. I rate it eight out of ten.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is an internet service provider helping us with backhaul infrastructure.

The product has valuable throughput capabilities. It also has an inbuilt spectrum analyzer for stable connectivity.

The platform's cost needs improvement.

I have been using Cambium Networks Wireless LAN since its inception in 2005. I also have a few certifications, including ePMP.

It has good RSI strength and efficient link performance. I rate this platform's stability a nine out of ten.

It is a scalable platform. We have around 200 connections in a single base station.

The technical support team is customer-friendly.

The configuration process is easy as we can get web-based support services. We require two technical resources to execute it. The setup involves a series of steps after assembly for point-to-point installations within ten kilometers, including mounting and alignment. It takes around five to ten minutes to link. If the equipment incorporates GPS functionality, the setup time can be reduced to as little as five minutes by automatically detecting longitude and latitude.

The setup involves determining the appropriate mounting height at both ends and calculating the elevation. It includes adjusting the height and direction based on compass readings for optimal signal transmission.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is inexpensive compared to other products. The pricing and licensing might vary based on each country's specific needs and telecommunication regulations.

It is a good platform for long-range communication. It has an efficient latency as well. One must select the model based on internet traffic and throughput requirements.

I rate it a nine out of ten.

We use this solution for WiFi network management for our clients. It is mostly utilized for public safety on high-end devices.

This solution is extremely user-friendly; it is very easy to configure and work with.

We would like this product to have more information data sheets available. At present we cannot easily access details around the full capability of a piece of equipment.

We have been using this solution for 10 to 15 years.

We haven't experienced any stability issues during our time using this solution.

We believe this to be a highly scalable solution.

We found the customer support team to be very responsive. However, they have a very rigid process of asking basic questions before escalating an issue to the correct team to resolve it, which can be frustrating.

We have previously worked with other partners, but we selected this solution because of its balance between quality and price.

We found the original implementation of this solution to be straightforward because of the level of experience we had.  However, upgrades to this product over time, have now meant that this can now be done easily by anyone, due to the development of handy integrated videos, and how-to videos which are directly accessible if either the cloud-based or on-premises management software.

We implemented the solution using a combination of reseller integration partners, and our own teams expertise.

The licensing costs for this solution are calculated per asset, and depending on the model of the equipment, it starts at $230, and goes up to roughly $1,200. The benefit of this solution is that there are no hidden costs; no cost for managing the equipment, and no cost for maintaining the equipment during its usable lifetime.

We recommend that organizations consult with the professional WLAN; this is a wireless device and without proper planning and installation, it won't work. This way, if there are specific requirements for the wireless WLAN, they can be confident in the solution.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I like how they have a single point of contact for administration. The web-based administration is what I find most beneficial.

I would like them to add some kind of web filtering, as well as the ability to add content filtering. That is something I would like them to be able to do.

If they could include some sort of web filtering, in-built antivirus, anti-malware, and data stream scanning in the next release. And if they include that, it would be a perfect solution.

I have been working with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN for five years.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is a stable solution.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is a scalable product.

I have everything from a single person in a home to a large installation with over 40 wireless access points, which is quite large.

Technical support is very knowledgeable.

We also work with Cambium Wireless WAN.

Previously, I worked with Ubiquiti and NETGEAR. We have a legacy system mobile. When compared with Cambium, I recommend Cambium Networks Wireless LAN.

Cambium, in my opinion, completely outperforms them.

The implementation process is exceedingly easy.

Cambium's initial price is a problem because it is more expensive than the others, but if you calculate the total cost of ownership over three years, Cambium probably works out better because there are no license fees.

The cost is determined by the item purchased. A wireless system has so many different types of applications. You have to consider if you need it outdoors, indoors, and across multiple sites, or if you require more than one website.

It's a good price, but not the best price. It's on the higher end of what I would call affordable for small to medium-sized businesses.

I would recommend hiring someone who knows what they are doing. This is the secret because is it easy to make an error, and easily ruin it.

We are partners with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN.

It's a marvelous system, I would rate Cambium Networks Wireless LAN an eight out of ten.

Not a lot of technical engineers are familiar with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN. They are familiar with implementing and using other solutions such as Aruba. Therefore, Cambium Networks needs to be more visible in the marketplace.

I have been using it for a couple of months.

It is a stable solution.

The solution is scalable as well. Approximately 20 engineers use this solution in my company.

Technical support is not great but not too bad either. They are slow at times.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is easy to deploy. The implementation can take two weeks to four months.

I deployed it myself with the help of other engineers.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is cheaper than Aruba.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Cambium Networks Wireless LAN at seven.

We use it for wireless solutions. 

It provides good support remotely, and it's very easy to configure.

There is room for improvement in the pricing model. Cambium is a little bit higher than some other products. There are some product types which have single cases, but the cost is very low.

I have been providing the service for one and a half years. It's accessible on both cloud and on-premises.

It is a stable solution. 

It's quite easy, not so difficult to set up. Nowadays, the product we are using as a backup or secondary solution for Cambium is even more familiar than Cambium.

Cambium is a high-cost product. As for performance, Cambium is very good, even better than Ruzzi, but the cost is a major consideration. So, clients tend to go for the more reasonably priced products.

I would give it an eight. Overall, it's a good product, but there is definitely room for improvement in terms of cost.

We use Cambium Networks Wireless LAN to manage and control network devices such as access points, routers, or network switches. This centralized management system, facilitated by cnMaestro enables administrators to configure and monitor their LAN devices seamlessly through the cloud.

The product pricing needs improvement.

The initial setup is relatively quick and straightforward, especially compared to other products. However, the complexity of the setup process may vary depending on the scale of the deployment.

It is an expensive product compared to other competitors.

It is a stable and secure platform. I rate it an eight.