Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Cambium Networks Wireless LAN compete in the wireless LAN solutions market. Cisco Meraki has an advantage due to its cloud-managed solutions and centralized management, while Cambium Networks stands out with its cost-effectiveness and stability without licensing constraints.
Features: Cisco Meraki offers centralized cloud management, high security features, and extensive management tools. It is valued for its ease in configuration and monitoring capabilities across varied organizational sizes. Cambium Networks is known for its stability, ease of configuration, and autonomy from controllers and licenses, making it suitable for customizable environments.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki could enhance its licensing flexibility and integration capabilities, and expand the depth of technical support. Cambium Networks would benefit from better scalability, more efficient cloud configuration options, and improved pricing models.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki provides flexible deployment options in cloud and on-premises setups with varying quality of technical support. Cambium Networks offers consistent and accessible support praised for its straightforward initial setup.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki's costs are tied to frequent license renewals, making it expensive with strong ROI in management ease and scalability. Cambium Networks offers a cost-effective option without ongoing license fees, providing favorable total cost of ownership and positive long-term ROI.
Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.