Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Fortinet FortiWLM comparison

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Fortinet FortiWLM both compete in wireless networking. User data suggests that Cisco Meraki holds an edge with its cloud-managed simplicity and robust security, appealing to smaller IT teams. Conversely, Fortinet FortiWLM's comprehensive security features and integration with Fortinet's ecosystem make it a preferred choice for enterprises needing extensive controls.

Features: Cisco Meraki offers a cloud-based dashboard for streamlined network management, handling multiple APs and user monitoring efficiently. It is known for its centralized control making it suitable for diverse organizational sizes. On the other hand, Fortinet FortiWLM integrates well with Fortinet's security network, providing extensive visibility and control that benefit organizations seeking robust security integrations.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki users often seek enhanced configuration options and better logging. The pricing model and license renewal process can be confusing. Fortinet FortiWLM could improve its guest management and reporting features. Simplifying its licensing would bring it more in line with market expectations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Meraki offers deployment across private, public, and hybrid clouds, enhancing flexibility. Its support is praised for responsiveness, though sometimes lacks depth in technical expertise. Fortinet FortiWLM operates mainly on-premises, offering stability but less flexibility. Users report consistent, yet occasionally slow, technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki is seen as expensive with a complex licensing model, yet it often shows good ROI for organizations with minimal network management staffing. Fortinet FortiWLM offers competitive pricing, especially beneficial to budget-conscious sectors like education, and provides strong ROI through reduced security management costs.