Fortinet FortiWLM vs Omada Access Points comparison

Fortinet and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Fortinet is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.9, while TP-Link is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.9. Fortinet holds a 1.9% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiWLM

Read 29 Fortinet FortiWLM reviews

1,907 Views
1,754 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,553 Views
3,517 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiWLM

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Fortinet FortiWLM and Omada Access Points compete in the wireless network management category. Fortinet seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and integration capabilities.

Features: Fortinet FortiWLM offers scalability, integrated security architecture, and a single-pane view for management. Its automated VLAN and SSID deployment are notable along with robust troubleshooting tools. Omada Access Points feature cost-effectiveness, compatibility with both wired and wireless technologies, and efficient centralized cloud management.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet could enhance its centralized management, improve pricing, and offer better integration with Apple products. Additional support for smaller businesses without mandatory contracts is also needed. Omada Access Points should improve speed, security, and stability, along with providing advanced APIs and better reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Fortinet FortiWLM and Omada Access Points are on-premises solutions. Fortinet provides robust technical support, but response times vary. Omada Access Points have average tech support, requiring escalation for complex issues. Fortinet is praised for comprehensive support, while Omada needs improvement in first-level support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet is considered cost-effective within its feature set, especially when part of a larger security framework, though pricing is higher than Omada's. Omada Access Points offer competitive one-time pricing with no recurring fees, appealing to smaller businesses seeking initial cost savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiWLM vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiWLM vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiWLM

Ranking in Wireless LAN

13th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiWLM is 1.9%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 4.1%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Omada Access Points	4.1%
Fortinet FortiWLM	1.9%
Other	94.0%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

LuayHlaleh

Information Technology Team Lead at TechnoPeak

Offers robust network management with cost considerations for large deployments

Large enterprises typically invest in FortiAnalyzer, though our company and SMB clients don't require this analysis tool. We use Ekahau for floor planning and Wi-Fi coverage analysis rather than Fortinet FortiWLM's built-in features. Ekahau helps us perform site surveys and plan access point placement. Fortinet FortiWLM is a flexible and common solution in Dubai. It's one of the best-selling products, with Etisalat, the largest ISP, installing Fortinet FortiGate for approximately 70-80% of their clients. The solution offers different series to accommodate various needs. The triple radio model costs around $1,000 (3,500 dirham) and supports 40-50 connected devices. The 231F model suits smaller deployments of 20-25 devices. I rate Fortinet FortiWLM a seven out of ten. While it's an excellent solution, Cisco remains the market leader.

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For me, the ease of setup and the rugged nature in harsh environments are most valuable. So, durability and ease of use have been its best features."

"The setup was easy."

"The greatest advantage is the security fabric Fortinet offers."

"Security is the feature we like most from Fortinet. In general, their security architecture is really great, because it involves everything: firewalls, wireless LANs, the user. Everything is really secure."

"Although there are a few steps, the initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"Fortinet FortiWLM is good for tracking assets, monitoring, and overall management."

"The most valuable features are central management and the many other features available."

"I have not faced any issues with stability or downtime."

More Fortinet FortiWLM pros

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"The pricing is reasonable."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"I have used Cisco previously and I don't see any specific differences from Fortinet FortiWLM or other vendors."

"The solution should improve user capacity."

"This solution should be easier to set up in a production environment."

"In the next release, they could improve by adding a controller-less server, or architecture that is provided in other solutions, such as Aruba. This would be a great benefit for customers."

"One of the main features that I see as lacking in any of the Fortinet products is the reporting. If you want to have proper, end-to-end reporting, you must purchase the FortiAnalyzer... If Fortinet could offer some better, built-in reporting, that would be a point of improvement."

"In terms of improvements, the price is higher than I would like. A reduction in pricing would be beneficial."

"When using the FortiGate as the wireless controller, you cannot have automatic user registration, which is something that they should offer."

"Cost is something that could be improved, but you have to pay for what you get."

More Fortinet FortiWLM cons

"There should be more remote support for the mobile application."

"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."

"The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is fairly priced."

"Fortinet FortiWLM's pricing is regular and competitive."

"Fortinet would do something with their pricing model to attract smaller business users and eliminate the mandatory service contracts."

"Licensing costs are reasonable. There are so many different types of licenses with Fortinet, but the licensing and the 24/7/365 support are so reasonable that I automatically include it with every transaction. I never line item it without it. There are no additional costs."

"To save yourself from increased setup and maintenance costs, I highly recommend undertaking a proper site survey from the beginning."

"For indoor access points, there is a one-time cost, upfront, whereas outdoor access points have an annual fee."

"In the last few years, due in part to the impact of COVID on the market, Fortinet has increased its prices by 35 percent."

"If a customer already is a FortiGate customer, the cost to go to the FortiAP is incredibly affordable, because you already have the controller."

More Fortinet FortiWLM pricing and cost advice

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiWLM?

The security is a valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiWLM?

Regarding functionality, a lower price for Fortinet FortiWLM would be better, but it's difficult. Regarding the integration with other vendors, we try to buy only products from a single vendor to a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiWLM?

I don't know about potential areas for improvement for Fortinet FortiWLM. Regarding functionality, a lower price for Fortinet FortiWLM would be better, but it's difficult. Regarding the integration...

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Fortinet FortiWLM

Compared 25% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Fortinet FortiWLM

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Fortinet FortiWLM

Compared 12% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Fortinet FortiWLM

Compared 10% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Fortinet FortiWLM

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortinet FortiWLM Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 18% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

SonicWall Wireless Network Manager vs Omada Access Points

Compared 2% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiWLM

September 2025

Download Fortinet FortiWLM product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

August 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

FortiWLM, FortiAP, Fortinet AP/OAP, Meru Wireless LAN

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Consolidate security and wireless LAN management with our integrated wireless solutions. Single-pane-of-glass management for security and access without the need to add point products simplifies deployment and reduces management complexity. These solutions are highly scalable to support even the largest organizations and distributed enterprises.

Fortinet

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiWLM vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Free Report: Fortinet FortiWLM vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiWLM vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiWLM vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.