Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5, while TP-Link is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 2.1% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Aruba Instant

Read 51 Aruba Instant reviews

2,947 Views
2,265 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

4,292 Views
3,463 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aruba Instant

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Aruba Instant and Omada Access Points compete in the wireless networking category, with Aruba having an edge in advanced features for larger infrastructures and Omada preferred for its affordability and ease of use for small to medium businesses.

Features: Aruba Instant offers a built-in firewall, application control, and flexible deployment options. Users appreciate its ease of installation and robust performance, highlighting its central management and scalability. Omada Access Points are reliable and simple, offering budget-friendly solutions and effective network control with centralized management.

Room for Improvement: Aruba Instant needs better documentation, improved troubleshooting tools, and stronger technical support. Its cloud management is less robust than some competitors, and it faces challenges with scalability and user compatibility. Omada users suggest enhancements in speed, security, and advanced management features to improve scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba Instant supports on-premises, public, private, and hybrid cloud deployments, offering versatility. However, it receives mixed reviews for customer service, with some delays reported. Omada is easier to deploy on-premises but is rated less favorably for large-scale enterprises. Its customer service is generally satisfactory, though response times could improve.

Pricing and ROI: Aruba Instant is more expensive, justified by its advanced features and often requires ongoing support contracts, affecting affordability. However, users report a positive ROI due to its robust performance. Omada Access Points are praised for cost-effectiveness, particularly for small to medium businesses, with straightforward pricing and no licensing fees.

To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant

Ranking in Wireless LAN

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant is 2.1%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 3.7%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Prashant-Patel

Senior Presales Consultant - Networking Solutions at Mannai

A highly stable and easy-to-deploy solution that is free and provides excellent deployment guides

The setup is very straightforward. There is no complexity at all. It took us 15 minutes. We need IP address details, DNS, a gateway, DHCP servers, and SSIDs. Single access points can act as controller-based, controller-less, and cloud-based solutions. That is the beauty of Aruba. If I have an on-premise solution and want to move to the cloud, I don't need separate hardware. The same hardware can be utilized in the cloud. The deployment guides that we get from Aruba are excellent. We have every piece of detail.

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find network management features related to monitoring Wi-Fi usage and visited sites particularly valuable. Content filtering is also important to prevent access to malicious or inappropriate websites. It is reliable and simple."

"The simplicity of the dashboard is one of the most valuable features. It's easy to use, and manage and the security features are robust. We can block unauthorized connections and create secure SSIDs."

"The product is easy to configure."

"The most beneficial features for network management are the price and the cloud console."

"Aruba Instant is a cloud-managed solution that can be managed from the cloud."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"The integration with ClearPass is the most valuable feature."

"Aruba Instant is cloud-based, and thus, it improves wireless network performance on cloud platforms. The solution allows network monitoring through devices like mobiles and desktops, which is a feasible option. The tool also has Bluetooth settings so a user can deploy Aruba Instant through a serial number or the Bluetooth option."

More Aruba Instant pros

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

"This product is easy to use."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"Its sturdiness and cost-effectiveness are the most valuable features."

"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."

"Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"The connectivity of the solution can use some improvement."

"For on-premises, I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten. For on-prem, if I want to integrate two more controls, and I want to extend my network , and add a couple of access points that need to be integrated with my network, I have to do the configurations and all. So that will be each and every time, as and when the users expand, the Wi-Fi solution expands; I need to do the configuration settings on all other controllers."

"Although built-in troubleshooting tools are available, they are not at all intuitive to use. Aruba Instant lacks decent documentation to use for troubleshooting wireless issues (fortunately there aren’t many)."

"The support offered by Aruba is slow."

"This solution would be improved if they supplied free software controllers."

"The security features must be improved."

"Aruba Instant does not currently offer a multi-gig switch or product, making it an area that requires improvement. Aruba Instant's competitors have multi-gig switches or products."

"The wireless coverage should be increased"

More Aruba Instant cons

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."

"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."

"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Some aspect of the price of Aruba Instant is very economical because if the customer is requiring more features the customer needs to pay a higher amount."

"The tool's pricing is neither cheap nor expensive."

"It's a one time cost, including the upgrades, but you have to pay on a yearly basis if you want support. The price is in the middle in comparison to that of competitors' products."

"I rate the product’s pricing a two out of ten."

"Aruba Instant is affordable."

"There’s no licensing required to use the tool."

"The licensing cost is somewhere around $20,000."

"Some in the hospitality industry use the solution because it's cheaper and doesn't require licenses."

More Aruba Instant pricing and cost advice

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Ubiquiti WLAN or Aruba Instant?

We researched Ubiquiti and Aruba when looking for a WLAN solution. Ubiquiti offers good WLAN access both indoors and outdoors. It provides an enterprise-level WIFI while remaining cost-effective. U...

See all answers

What do you like most about Aruba Instant?

I find network management features related to monitoring Wi-Fi usage and visited sites particularly valuable. Content filtering is also important to prevent access to malicious or inappropriate web...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Instant?

The licensing costs depend on the product. The smaller switch is around one hundred and twenty euros. We do not sell very expensive devices as we move to other products.

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ruckus Wireless vs Aruba Instant

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant

Compared 13% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Aruba Instant

Compared 10% of the time

ExtremeCloud IQ vs Aruba Instant

Compared 5% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Aruba Instant

Compared 4% of the time

More Aruba Instant Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 18% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant

March 2025

Download Aruba Instant product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

March 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

No data available

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Aruba Instant delivers the only controllerless Wi-Fi solution that is easy to set-up, and loaded with security and smarts needed to accelerate your business without breaking your budget.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Purdue University, Orlando Magic, Brussels Airport Company, Molecaten Holiday Parks

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points

March 2025

Free Report: Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.