Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.4, while TP-Link is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.9. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 2.0% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Aruba Instant

Read 51 Aruba Instant reviews

2,729 Views
2,098 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

4,243 Views
3,405 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aruba Instant

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Aruba Instant and Omada Access Points compete in the wireless networking category, with Aruba having an edge in advanced features for larger infrastructures and Omada preferred for its affordability and ease of use for small to medium businesses.

Features: Aruba Instant offers a built-in firewall, application control, and flexible deployment options. Users appreciate its ease of installation and robust performance, highlighting its central management and scalability. Omada Access Points are reliable and simple, offering budget-friendly solutions and effective network control with centralized management.

Room for Improvement: Aruba Instant needs better documentation, improved troubleshooting tools, and stronger technical support. Its cloud management is less robust than some competitors, and it faces challenges with scalability and user compatibility. Omada users suggest enhancements in speed, security, and advanced management features to improve scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba Instant supports on-premises, public, private, and hybrid cloud deployments, offering versatility. However, it receives mixed reviews for customer service, with some delays reported. Omada is easier to deploy on-premises but is rated less favorably for large-scale enterprises. Its customer service is generally satisfactory, though response times could improve.

Pricing and ROI: Aruba Instant is more expensive, justified by its advanced features and often requires ongoing support contracts, affecting affordability. However, users report a positive ROI due to its robust performance. Omada Access Points are praised for cost-effectiveness, particularly for small to medium businesses, with straightforward pricing and no licensing fees.

To learn more, read our detailed Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,190 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant

Ranking in Wireless LAN

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant is 2.0%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Prashant-Patel

Senior Presales Consultant - Networking Solutions at Mannai

A highly stable and easy-to-deploy solution that is free and provides excellent deployment guides

The setup is very straightforward. There is no complexity at all. It took us 15 minutes. We need IP address details, DNS, a gateway, DHCP servers, and SSIDs. Single access points can act as controller-based, controller-less, and cloud-based solutions. That is the beauty of Aruba. If I have an on-premise solution and want to move to the cloud, I don't need separate hardware. The same hardware can be utilized in the cloud. The deployment guides that we get from Aruba are excellent. We have every piece of detail.

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like best about Aruba Instant is that it serves as a virtual controller, so you don't need to buy other equipment to manage all your access points. I also like that the solution is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of Aruba Instant is its cloud capability, which allows us to manage it through the cloud."

"The product is easy to configure."

"In terms of stability, Aruba Instant is the best on the market."

"I can implement it at small sites, and I can also implement it at mid-sized locations. It is very flexible. It is really nice and useful for customers who have many small sites."

"The technical support from Aruba is of high quality, and I would rate it a ten."

"Has many advanced features: Built-in firewall, local radius, application visibility and control, not locked into support agreements."

"Allows network monitoring through mobile devices"

More Aruba Instant pros

"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

"The initial setup is not complicated."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"My biggest problem with Aruba Instant was the DHCP implementation. The DHCP server needs to ping an IP address to connect to the internet. In some cases, we don't have a DHCP server in the network, and it was really a problem."

"The only issue we've had is getting equipment supplies. The availability of the APs that I want to use has been an issue. It took almost two months to get them the first time. I've ordered a few more for another client, and they're still on back order. It has been over a month now."

"The support offered by Aruba is slow."

"It is good as it is. If anything, its reporting could be improved."

"The solution should be able to support more users on the access points."

"The reach of the solution could be improved. It could be a bit stronger."

"They could provide a centralized system to manage switches incorporated into multiple branches."

"Aruba Instant should not have a limit on users for future releases."

More Aruba Instant cons

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"The technical support could be improved."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved."

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We only pay for the support and the contract licenses from Aruba Instant."

"There’s no licensing required to use the tool."

"The tool's pricing is neither cheap nor expensive."

"Avoid the Central cloud license if you can."

"I would rate pricing six out of ten."

"I personally would rather pay that little bit more and get what I need because I know what I'm getting, as opposed to going for something cheaper that's not as manageable and doesn't give as much."

"Two years ago, I paid INR 12,000 for access points, but now, I will have to pay double the amount, which comes up to INR 24,000, making it a costly product."

"Some in the hospitality industry use the solution because it's cheaper and doesn't require licenses."

More Aruba Instant pricing and cost advice

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Ubiquiti WLAN or Aruba Instant?

We researched Ubiquiti and Aruba when looking for a WLAN solution. Ubiquiti offers good WLAN access both indoors and outdoors. It provides an enterprise-level WIFI while remaining cost-effective. U...

See all answers

What do you like most about Aruba Instant?

I find network management features related to monitoring Wi-Fi usage and visited sites particularly valuable. Content filtering is also important to prevent access to malicious or inappropriate web...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Instant?

In my experience, Aruba Instant's price is reasonable compared to premium products like Ruckus, Cisco, or Juniper. However, when compared to entry-level market segments, the price is higher. Overal...

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Aruba Instant

Compared 13% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Aruba Instant

Compared 13% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Aruba Instant

Compared 11% of the time

ExtremeCloud IQ vs Aruba Instant

Compared 5% of the time

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Aruba Instant

Compared 5% of the time

More Aruba Instant Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 18% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant

April 2025

Download Aruba Instant product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

April 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

No data available

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Aruba Instant delivers the only controllerless Wi-Fi solution that is easy to set-up, and loaded with security and smarts needed to accelerate your business without breaking your budget.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Purdue University, Orlando Magic, Brussels Airport Company, Molecaten Holiday Parks

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points

April 2025

Free Report: Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,190 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Aruba Instant vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.