Aruba Instant vs Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN comparison

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Aruba Instant compete in the wireless network solutions category. Cisco Meraki seems to have an upper hand due to its cloud-based management that simplifies network monitoring and configuration, despite higher costs.

Features: Cisco Meraki offers a cloud-based management system that integrates with other Cisco products, prioritizing simplicity and remote management. It boasts high-level security features and is ideal for smaller IT teams. Aruba Instant utilizes a virtual controller for central management, requiring no additional hardware. It provides high performance and flexibility, integrating easily with mobile devices and ensuring robust security.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki users suggest improvements in error logs and request more advanced enterprise features. Its licensing model is a concern, rendering products unusable if not renewed. Aruba Instant's Central management is less feature-rich, with documentation and multi-user support needing enhancements. Feedback also indicates issues with auto-channeling and roaming.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki is noted for its flexibility and ease of deployment in cloud environments, with a streamlined integration process. Reviews of its customer service are mixed, with some praising quick responses. Aruba Instant is recognized for easy on-premises deployment and reliable technical support, often requiring fewer complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki is a premium solution with a challenging licensing structure, but the ROI is often seen as justifiable through effective network management. Although it is more expensive, users appreciate the cost-performance value. Aruba Instant is favored for its cost-effectiveness, absent of licensing fees, offering a compelling ROI through lower initial and operational costs, making it attractive for SMBs and budget-conscious enterprises.