Acronis Cyber Protect vs Druva inSync comparison

"The most valuable feature is its consistency."

"Acronis has a very rich functionality."

"i use the backup solution and I use something called Disk Director, which is a related product. Together, they allow me to manage all of my storage space."

"The ability to clone backups."

"In my opinion, it's the best product for end-users and PCs."

"Stability is always good. I have used Acronis for 10 years now, if not more. I have never had a problem with availability, etc."

"The backup timing and restoring process is great compared to other options."

"It works with different types of partitions or different OSs."

"If you are looking for a backup solution, go with Druva because it's quite simple."

"All the data is well encrypted. In addition, the data is split into pieces so that if an endpoint is attacked or compromised with any kind of ransomware, the compromised machine can be relocated or restored. All the data that was previously backed up can be restored from the cloud. It has a lot of security features. Druva currently offers only the cloud version on AWS. Being a cloud solution, Druva goes by a lot of security compliances and provides a security portfolio. People are very skeptical of the data security in cloud solutions, and Druva has given consideration to that. It has some good geo-location features. If a machine is lost, when the machine is switched on and connected to the internet, that machine can be geo-located and tracked. It also has got the geo-wipeout feature. If someone tries to take out the data from a lost machine, they won't be able to do that. The moment an IT admin comes to know that the machine is no longer with a user, he or she can auto-run the geo-wipeout feature so that the data cannot be read by any third party. Duality replication is a unique thing about this solution. Everybody's data is not backed up if the data is common. Similar data is not backed up from other machines. The data backup also happens very smoothly. The bandwidth choking is very less. When the data is getting backed up, the users do not even get to know. There is no impact even when the users are not using high-speed bandwidth."

"It's incredibly fast."

"You don't need a certified administrator to manage this product."

"The main benefit of this solution is that it automatically scans the files for ransomware after the backup is complete."

"The tool has good features. The backup is also accurate."

"It is simple to implement and use. It's very flexible."

"Druva is offered as a service so that we can access it from any enterprise-based browser or URL. We also have a single sign-on, which allows me to log in securely. Hence, I can easily access the system, configure it, perform day-to-day monitoring tasks, and check for any issues or configurations needed. Overall, it's a simple and easy-to-use tool with a high-speed and straightforward interface for management."

"The solution's reporting feature could be better."

"If there was a wizard that would lead you down a road, when creating a backup, that would probably be better than having to go online or call somebody to actually do a backup. It's not intuitive..."

"This is not a feature-rich solution."

"​It would be nice if it could support more types of storage: EMC, HPE, Veeam, etc."

"It could have a better ability to manage backups over a longer period."

"Acronis Backup can improve the latency when the file size is larger, we have had issues. Additionally, they could allow more flexibility when searching for information and I cannot download the CBIS backup copy information which could be made easier."

"The solution's error handling can be improved specifically for Linux errors."

"In the span of six months, maintenance is done at least twice and you are told that it is coming up, with apologies for the inconvenience. It's a distraction, and it interferes with the backup schedule."

"One functionality I would like is the ability to manage multiple Office 365 tenants from a single console."

"The backup time is very poor. The backup runs continuously. It goes on from morning till night. The system performance also becomes very poor when Druva inSync is running."

"It would be good if bare metal backups were possible."

"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."

"The support of other cloud services needs to be improved. It has very good cloud support for AWS but not with others."

"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."

"The product needs to improve its support."

"Druva inSync is very high in price. A general customer cannot afford this solution. Even if the product is good, people cannot afford such a high cost just for taking the backup. This is a recurring investment, and the customers have to pay for it every year. Druva is also yet to develop the channel and the channel or partner commitment."

"I would say that at the pricepoint that it's at, it's definitely worth the money."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"We were on a perpetual license for Acronis Backup."

"​I like the pricing​, and that it is easy to use and has performed well. ​"

"It is very cost-effective for the SMB segment, especially for start-ups and smaller environments. It is cost-effective for on-premises and on-cloud deployments in such environments."

"The price is reasonable."

"Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line."

"If the solution was less expensive it would be better."

"The product is fairly priced, I would rate its pricing five out of ten."

"Out of all the solutions we evaluated, Druva inSync was the most affordable."

"The pricing of Druva inSync is very high as compared to other cloud backup solutions."

"The pricing is good."

"It's approximately $4000.00 per user for one year."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very cheap and ten being very expensive."

"The price is quite good, It's approximately $4000.00 per user for one year."

"Once you decide to go with this product the cost can be worked out with the vendor."