Actian Ingres vs SAP IQ comparison

Actian and SAP are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Actian is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.7. Actian holds a 0.1% mindshare in SQL, compared to SAP’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Actian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Actian Ingres

Read 2 Actian Ingres reviews

55 Views
28 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP IQ

Read 21 SAP IQ reviews

364 Views
264 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Actian Ingres

SAP IQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

SAP IQ and Actian Ingres compete in database management systems. Actian Ingres seems to have the upper hand due to its versatility and adaptability in various applications.

Features: SAP IQ focuses on analytics, offering data compression and high performance for data-intensive tasks. Actian Ingres emphasizes transactional processing capabilities and scalability, suitable for diverse database needs. SAP IQ aims at analytical performance, while Actian Ingres handles various operations efficiently.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP IQ often requires a complex setup but includes extensive support options. Actian Ingres provides a simpler deployment model with direct and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: SAP IQ's initial costs may be higher, but long-term ROI is notable due to analytics strength. Actian Ingres offers competitive pricing and quicker ROI, being cost-effective in database operations with lower upfront expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Actian Ingres vs. SAP IQ Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Actian Ingres vs. SAP IQ

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Actian Ingres

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

27th

Ranking in Data Warehouse

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP IQ

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

26th

Ranking in Data Warehouse

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Actian Ingres is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP IQ is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

GustavHoltzhausen

Sr Sales Engineer at HCLSoftware

Reliable performance enhances operations with good technical support

We run the entire IRS system, the income system, and the tax system. We also manage the entire Absa banking system in Africa. There's a lot of database applications, similar to those used in banks and the IRS The most valuable features for us are reliability and performance. Our system is used…

Read full review

Tejas Raj

Manager at Capgemini

Columnar database, so pulling records is easy but there isn't enough documentation for installation

I've seen very few SAP IQ systems in recent years. So people are moving away from SAP IQ In the last three years, I've rarely encountered customers using it. Fewer systems with SAP IQ usage among our customers. Most of them have moved on to HANA. There are parallel products, and there are also viable alternatives from AWS, so many have migrated to those.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features for us are reliability and performance."

"The deployment of our solution across a number of servers using Ingres .NET has meant that we can protect the database server behind a highly secure firewall and deploy the front end solutions on a normal web server."

"The primary benefit of SAP IQ is its ability to limit the expansion of the costly SAP HANA database, which has limited storage capacity. This necessitates a form of data management that involves moving data from SAP HANA to SAP NLS, which is essentially archiving. This allows us to retain access to the data via a link whenever it is required."

"Valuable features for us include the compression, speed, fast response time, and easy object maintenance."

"The product is easy to learn."

"The column-based technologies (basically all the database for ITP) are used for SAP IQ. It is used as a column-based solution."

"The initial setup is easy."

"All data is compressed and indexed, allowing for fast execution of transactions."

"IQ is a very high-performance and high-transaction database."

"It is very robust for ad hoc DW queries and its columnar compression is unique and valuable."

More SAP IQ pros

Cons

"The ability to reset the log file without stopping the DBMS would be helpful for us."

"The seamless integration is a bit of an issue."

"There is very little documentation available."

"The tool gets stuck sometimes."

"I think the universe should be part of the Sybase IQ tool set."

"Concurrency and functional error messaging."

"The only negative aspect of IQ is the cost, which can be challenging for companies in Peru."

"The room for improvement would be the marketing of the product, because this product is much better than advertised."

"The primary negative aspect is the cost, which can be a challenge due to the economic conditions in Peru."

"The solution works best when combined with other SAP solutions. If the environment has other systems other options might be better."

More SAP IQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Evaluate all options; check to see if you need expensive add-ons."

"Negotiation is very important."

"The cost of implementation is about $3,000."

"It's not that costly. So, the pricing is cheap."

"The only costs after standard licensing fees are for add-ons and upgrades."

"Negotiate based on the features required."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

11%

Educational Organization

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

45%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Actian Ingres?

The seamless integration is a bit of an issue. I would like to see more direct connectors and stuff like SQLAlchemy. It's there but isn't available as a standard, so it involves going to GitHub to ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Actian Ingres?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Actian Ingres?

Initially, it's a lot less expensive than competitors. Price performance has always been a priority, ensuring we remain competitive in the market.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP IQ?

IQ implementation costs about three thousand dollars. It's less expensive compared to alternatives like Teradata Base in terms of transactional efficiency.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP IQ?

The primary negative aspect is the cost, which can be a challenge due to the economic conditions in Peru.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP IQ?

I worked on implementing new databases, migration data in production, and developer environments with SAP IQ.

See all answers

Comparisons

Oracle Database Appliance vs Actian Ingres

Compared 100% of the time

More Actian Ingres Competitors

Snowflake vs SAP IQ

Compared 31% of the time

SAP HANA vs SAP IQ

Compared 15% of the time

SQL Server vs SAP IQ

Compared 12% of the time

Apache Hadoop vs SAP IQ

Compared 12% of the time

SAP BW4HANA vs SAP IQ

Compared 9% of the time

More SAP IQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Warehouse

April 2025

Download Actian Ingres product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP IQ

March 2025

Download SAP IQ product report

Also Known As

Ingres, Ingres 2006

Sybase IQ

Overview

Actian’s Ingres is a leading, enterprise-grade database management system designed to reduce IT costs and time-to-value, while delivering the strength and features expected from an enterprise-class database. Ingres 10.2 is the latest version of the database, containing enhancements that will make it easier to internationalize customer applications. Along with improved performance and reduced configuration overhead, users can take their first steps into big data analytics with the new Window functions.

Actian

SAP® IQ software delivers speed and power for extreme-scale enterprise data warehousing and analytics. Its column-oriented, grid-based massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture and patented data compression and indexing technologies enable companies to exploit the value of huge amounts of data at the speed of business.

SAP

Sample Customers

Groupe Adeo, IsCool Entertainment

ASR Group, Citrix, State of Indiana, PocketCard Co. Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

Actian Ingres vs. SAP IQ

April 2025

Free Report: Actian Ingres vs. SAP IQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Actian Ingres vs. SAP IQ and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Actian Ingres vs. SAP IQ report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors and best Data Warehouse vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.