Acunetix vs ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform comparison

"We use the solution for the scanning of vulnerabilities like SQL injections."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed at which it can scan multiple domains in just a few hours."

"The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution."

"It's very user-friendly for the testing teams. It's very easy for them to understand things and to fix vulnerabilities."

"The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code."

"The usability and overall scan results are good."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."

"We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic."

"It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved."

"There's a clear need for a reduction in pricing to make the service more accessible."

"Acunetix needs to include agent analysis."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"The pricing is a bit on the higher side."

"Currently only supports web scanning."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"The anomaly detection could be improved."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."