Acunetix and Ixia BreakingPoint lead in network security and testing products. Acunetix often has the upper hand due to its intuitive support and ease of deployment, while Ixia BreakingPoint stands out for its advanced features.
Features: Acunetix provides robust scanning capabilities, vulnerability management, and an intuitive interface, which are critical for web application security. Ixia BreakingPoint is noted for its comprehensive testing tools, realistic traffic simulations, and advanced feature set, which offer a broader value in network security simulations.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix could benefit from better integration options with third-party tools, broader interoperability, and enhanced user interface customization. Ixia BreakingPoint users have suggested improvements in streamlined updates, better documentation, and simplifying its complex interface for ease of use.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is easy to deploy and has reliable customer service, which users appreciate for its simplicity and quick adoption. Ixia BreakingPoint deployment is more complex; however, its extensive customer support is helpful in overcoming initial setup challenges and ensures a supportive experience for users.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix is cost-effective, offering a good return on investment with quick vulnerability resolution, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Ixia BreakingPoint involves a higher initial cost, which users find justified by its expansive capabilities and feature depth, making it suitable for those ready to invest in broader network security functionality.
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
