Acunetix vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform comparison

Invicti and JFrog are both solutions in the DevSecOps category. Invicti is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while JFrog is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. Invicti holds a 10.4% mindshare in DSO, compared to JFrog’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 32 Acunetix reviews

752 Views
616 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Read 3 JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform reviews

7 Views
4 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Acunetix and JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform are in competition within the cybersecurity and DevOps integration space. Acunetix is noted for its straightforward pricing and support, while JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is preferred for its advanced features despite the higher cost.

Features: Acunetix provides comprehensive vulnerability detection, detailed scanning capabilities, and essential cybersecurity measures. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform offers an integrated ecosystem for managing binaries, seamless deployments, and robust collaboration tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix offers a swift deployment process with reliable customer service aimed at minimizing setup time. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform requires a more complex deployment but provides extensive resources and support for streamlining the process.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix features a straightforward pricing structure that leads to a quick ROI due to its impact on security. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform demands a higher initial investment, but its feature set justifies the cost for long-term ROI through enhanced DevOps practices.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,564 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in DevSecOps

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (17th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (14th), Vulnerability Management (23rd)

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Ranking in DevSecOps

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Supply Chain Security (16th), AWS Marketplace (32nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the DevSecOps category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 10.4%, down from 10.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is 0.2%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

DevSecOps

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami

Compliance Manager at Compunnel

Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…

Read full review

Fredierick Saladas

DevOps Lead at Standard Chartered Bank

Provides superior integration options and comprehensive reporting features

The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options. Improved support for mobile devices would also be advantageous, allowing team members to access the system more effectively while on the go. In the next release, we would like to see advanced analytics features, including predictive analytics to help forecast project outcomes. Additionally, a more robust mobile app with offline capabilities would be valuable for remote work scenarios.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Acunetix is the UI and the scan results are simple."

"The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code."

"Acunetix is the best service in the world. It is easy to manage. It gives a lot of information to the users to see and identify problems in their site or applications. It works very well."

"The features of Acunetix have proved most effective in identifying vulnerabilities."

"The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"The usability and overall scan results are good."

"The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution."

More Acunetix pros

"I appreciate the features in JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform, especially the efficient file management where downloads and uploads are optimized, saving time. The storage efficiency is also great as it avoids redundancy, which is crucial for our team. It is also quite easy to use, especially for basic commands through the command line. It's straightforward for us internally, and our data is well-hosted on their servers, which makes data location and querying fast and efficient. Moving our storage to JFrog has streamlined our development cycle by eliminating duplicated data, which previously took up extra space locally. This efficiency is crucial for our workflow, although network speeds still play a significant role in performance."

"They have a professional service team that works alongside their engineering and performance teams."

"The most valuable features include task tracking and reporting capabilities."

Cons

"It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved."

"The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans."

"There's a clear need for a reduction in pricing to make the service more accessible."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"The solution is generally stable, however, there might be room for improvement regarding glitches or bugs."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"Acunetix needs to be dynamic with JavaScript code, unlike Netsparker which can scan complex agents."

"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."

More Acunetix cons

"Our locations are in different environments, so the remote server takes time to catch up, causing replication delays. The engineering team suggested that this issue would be resolved, but I'm not sure if it has been addressed yet. This is more of a feature enhancement that we suggested."

"The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options."

"We have encountered stability issues lately, particularly with frequent 500 internal server errors. Despite efforts from our DevOps team to adjust settings, these issues persist, affecting our workflow, especially with machine learning data uploads. Overall, while it's beneficial for storage and accessibility, stability issues need improvement for seamless operations. The occasional occurrence of internal server errors takes several minutes to resolve on their own and can disrupt workflows. Another concern is that sometimes files appear to be successfully uploaded, but then they cannot be downloaded, with no error message indicating the issue during the upload process. This inconsistency needs to be addressed by JFrog to ensure reliable functionality for users like us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The price is exceptionally high."

"The solution is expensive."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts."

"Regarding pricing, I focus on the platform's interface and user communication rather than costs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which DevSecOps solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I typically use Acunetix ( /products/acunetix-reviews ) to identify vulnerabilities for clients.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I would recommend Acunetix to others. Overall, I rate this solution seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

Overall, the solution has been a great asset to our team. I advise investing time in the initial setup and training to leverage its capabilities fully. Ensure you clearly understand your needs and ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts. Licensing options are flexible, but ensure you understand the terms and any additional costs ...

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 12% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 10% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

April 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Marketplace

March 2025

Download JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

The JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform optimizes software development life cycles through robust artifact management, CI/CD automation, and strong version control. Notable for its security features, it supports seamless software version maintenance and vulnerability scanning. Praised for enhancing organizational efficiency, it ensures faster, secure deliveries, improving collaboration within teams.

JFrog

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

March 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform report.

See our list of best DevSecOps vendors.

We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.