Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Acunetix vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
9.1
Acunetix support is mixed; some praise responsiveness, others cite slow response times and question cost-effectiveness despite 24/7 availability.
No sentiment score available
Spirent CyberFlood's customer service is praised for its local team, providing effective support with a satisfaction rating of 7/10.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.7
Acunetix requires improvements in testing, pricing, and integration, with enhanced false positive management, mobile functionality, and licensing flexibility.
Sentiment score
6.5
Spirent CyberFlood needs improved port availability, speed, storage, frequent updates, language options, browser support, and error reporting.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Acunetix is praised for scalability, adaptability, and ease, though some note license limitations and seek performance improvements.
Sentiment score
5.0
Spirent CyberFlood is viewed as scalable but limited in expandability, reflecting diverse user experiences and satisfaction levels.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
5.5
Enterprise buyers found Acunetix pricing high and complex, with initial competitiveness fading against similarly featured competitors.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Acunetix is praised for stability, reliable performance, minimal maintenance, effective support, and consistently high user ratings.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.3
Acunetix is valued for ease of use, detailed reporting, scalability, and integration, offering comprehensive security insights and features.
Sentiment score
7.5
Spirent CyberFlood offers a user-friendly traffic generator and flexible network monitoring tools, ideal for adaptable, efficient solutions.
 

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix
Ranking in Application Security Tools
16th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
13th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (20th), DevSecOps (6th)
Spirent CyberFlood
Ranking in Application Security Tools
35th
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
32nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.5%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AnubhavGoswami - PeerSpot reviewer
Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup
The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…
Haider Jarral - PeerSpot reviewer
I like the solution's flexibility
Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.
What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses.
What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?
I would generally recommend Acunetix to any organization in the IT-enabled sector. However, I have not worked for a non-IT organization, so I cannot comment on that. I'd rate the solution nine out ...
What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?
Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more detail...
What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?
I use CyberFlood to generate SSL traffic for cybersecurity testing.
 

Also Known As

AcuSensor
CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand
Digicel
Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.