AgilePoint vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

AgilePoint and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. AgilePoint is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.3, while Nintex is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3. AgilePoint holds a 0.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AgilePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

AgilePoint

Read 6 AgilePoint reviews

328 Views
236 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,623 Views
1,564 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

AgilePoint

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and AgilePoint are competing in workflow automation. While AgilePoint seems to have the upper hand with its extensive features, its higher cost might be justified by these capabilities.

Features: Nintex Process Platform excels with its seamless integration capabilities, advanced workflow automation, and user-friendly design for rapid deployment. AgilePoint is notable for dynamic content management, extensive customization options, and support for multiple deployment environments.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could enhance mobile support, expand integration options, and improve scalability. AgilePoint may benefit from simplifying complex configurations, improving user interface simplicity, and enhancing initial deployment guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex offers a straightforward cloud-based deployment with responsive support teams for quick implementation. AgilePoint provides versatile deployment choices, including detailed assistance for hybrid and on-premises environments, but requires more technical support for complex configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex is recognized for reasonable setup costs and strong ROI through efficient process automation. AgilePoint, while potentially more costly upfront, offers higher ROI for businesses needing extensive customization and adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AgilePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (25th), Low-Code Development Platforms (21st)

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (9th), Workload Automation (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AgilePoint is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.0%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Ayush S

Automation Developer at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Provides efficient process management features, but it needs more integration capabilities

We use AgilePoint for an idea submission application for our business processes. It allows managers to review and update the approved idea on the dashboard AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management. We can integrate it with many applications including Microsoft, UiPath, and other…

Read full review

Damilola Adeleye

Business Automation Developer at Polaris Bank Nigeria Plc

Straightforward interface and user-friendly

There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."

"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."

"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."

"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."

"AgilePoint's automation is excellent in managing different user roles and handling data associated with a particular instance of the workflow."

"The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online."

"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."

"The strength of this solution lies in its connectors and the accessibility of an open API. The presence of an open API allows users to create custom connectors if necessary, provided there is access to the source API documentation. Additionally, the platform features a straightforward yet highly effective forms tool. This tool not only seamlessly integrates with the workflow functionality but also facilitates the transmission of information to the document generation tool. This comprehensive integration is particularly noteworthy when compared to alternatives such as Oracle, which tends to rely on more complex and separate logic for similar functionalities. A key strength of Nintex lies in its user-centric approach to help documentation. The materials are designed to be easily understood, avoiding complex terminology. In cases where technical terms are used, they are linked to articles for further clarification. This contrasts with platforms like Microsoft and Oracle, which may employ technical jargon without clear explanations. Nintex further supports its users through a robust online community, fostering collaboration and shared insights. Additionally, Nintex University offers online training across all applications, following a role-based structure. Unlike some other platforms, Nintex's training is thoughtfully broken down into shorter courses, focused on specific roles. This approach ensures that users can efficiently access the information they need without navigating through extensive and potentially irrelevant content, as may be the case with Oracle's training structure."

"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."

"The technical support is very good."

"The technical support provided by Nintex is very helpful."

"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."

"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"Integrations and customizations should be improved in AgilePoint and other low-code solutions."

"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."

"They should add more information about functionality."

"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."

"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."

"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."

"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."

"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."

"The security features for this solution need to be improved."

"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."

"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."

"It's very tedious to manage."

"There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is more cost-effective than local tools."

"Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."

"I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."

"I think the price is reasonable."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

Government

University

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AgilePoint?

AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AgilePoint?

AgilePoint is worth the money, especially for small teams. However, I am not familiar with their enterprise pricing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AgilePoint?

There is room for improvement in integrations and customizations for AgilePoint and other low-code, no-code solutions. Additionally, the marketing of such products should be more honest. They often...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs AgilePoint

Compared 23% of the time

Mendix vs AgilePoint

Compared 15% of the time

Camunda vs AgilePoint

Compared 13% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs AgilePoint

Compared 12% of the time

OutSystems vs AgilePoint

Compared 11% of the time

More AgilePoint Competitors

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 22% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Ivanti Automation vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download AgilePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

AgilePoint

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Free Report: AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AgilePoint vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.