Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alluvio AppResponse vs Azure Monitor comparison

Riverbed and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #47 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. Riverbed holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to Microsoft’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Alluvio AppResponse
Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews
  • 436 Views
  • 273 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Azure Monitor
Read 54 Azure Monitor reviews
  • 14,357 Views
  • 12,750 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and Azure Monitor are enterprise-grade monitoring tools competing in the network and systems monitoring category. Azure Monitor has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set though Alluvio AppResponse is favored for deployment and customer service.

What features are offered by Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse offers deep packet inspection, effective network behavior analysis, and powerful troubleshooting tools. Azure Monitor provides extensive integration capabilities, robust analytics, and a detailed and flexible alerting system.

What areas of improvement can be found in Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse could benefit from a more intuitive setup, enhanced reporting, and greater ease of use. Azure Monitor needs improvements in its log search functionalities, streamlined alert configuration process, and reduced complexity for new users.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse is easier to deploy with supportive customer service. Azure Monitor offers extensive documentation but involves a more complex setup process, making Alluvio AppResponse preferred for deployment and customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse users report a higher initial setup cost but recognize value through its specific features' ROI. Azure Monitor is generally more expensive on a subscription basis but delivers high ROI via integrated services and scalability.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
47th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (60th)
Azure Monitor
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Monitor is 7.5%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmet Kilic - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels
I rate Alluvio AppResponse 10 out of 10. If you work for a financial company especially, you probably face problems on the application side. The problem is easy to identify, but you need to determine the root cause. You can solve issues easily via AppResponse because it shows you all the details of your transactions so you can see the real problem in the database, network, software, etc. For example, you can find the solution easily if you create the right dashboard on your site. If you can't find the problem, you can observe or investigate PCAP.
Read full review
Syed Abid - PeerSpot reviewer
Monthly and weekly resource monitoring has improved efficiency
Azure Monitor can improve by adding some kind of storage for logs. I can get the runtime logs alone, yet if Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at least to log storage, I can fix the logs without syncing with Log Analytics Workspace and Sentinel. If they do that, and if they can integrate a little pricing adjustment, it will be profitable for the Microsoft tool.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We really like the scalability capabilities."
"You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring. It helps ensure that network overloads don't happen with alerts allowing for proactive decisions."
"AppResponse is a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility into applications at all levels, from Layer 1 to Layer 7. We can trace all those sections: physical, IP, transport, presentation, application, etc. It gives us the full picture."
"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."
"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."
"It provides us with complete visibility of every packet."
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."
"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."
More Alluvio AppResponse pros
"I can conclude reports for the monthly, weekly, and peak time of the resources."
"Azure Monitor gives us the observability to check everything that we have in the cloud."
"The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up."
"The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution."
"The solution very easily integrates with Azure services and in one click you can monitor your resource."
"It is a move-in powerful feature compared to other market-leading tools."
"Azure Monitor is really just a source for Dynatrace. It's just collecting data and monitoring the environment and the infrastructure. It is fairly good at that."
"It allows you to set thresholds on the metrics and receive alerts."
More Azure Monitor pros
 

Cons

"They need to better integrate with products and solutions from different vendors."
"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."
"The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually."
"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."
"The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."
More Alluvio AppResponse cons
"I believe Azure Monitor is already a top-notch solution with excellent functionality and there is not much I would suggest for improvement. However, there is one limitation that certain features require payment, even for testing purposes, which can be a challenge."
"If I contact the First Line Support, they seem disconnected and lack technical information."
"Azure Monitor could improve by adding capabilities for data observability and integrating more tightly with their data platform components."
"They need to work with other cloud providers - not just Azure."
"As a younger product it still has room for feature improvement and enhancement."
"Azure Monitor can improve by adding some kind of storage for logs."
"The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring."
"It's really complex to retrieve or query the logs in Azure Monitor."
More Azure Monitor cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."
"It is costly for small and medium businesses."
"The solution is no more expensive than other products."
"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
"The licensing is a monthly fee."
"The solution is very costly because you have to pay for various things such as adding to logs and internet alerts."
"The solution is expensive, but it is worth the price."
"My company is okay with the current pricing of the solution."
"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"
"The Azure Insight is a little bit expensive."
"The tool is expensive."
"The solution is a pay-as-you-go consumption service and is the least expensive in the market."
More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...
See all answers
How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
See all answers
What do you like most about Azure Monitor?
Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?
Azure Monitor can improve by adding some kind of storage for logs. I can get the runtime logs alone, yet if Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at lea...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 100% of the time
More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors
Datadog vs Azure Monitor Logo
Datadog vs Azure Monitor
Compared 22% of the time
Sentry vs Azure Monitor Logo
Sentry vs Azure Monitor
Compared 14% of the time
Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor Logo
Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor
Compared 13% of the time
Grafana vs Azure Monitor Logo
Grafana vs Azure Monitor
Compared 11% of the time
New Relic vs Azure Monitor Logo
New Relic vs Azure Monitor
Compared 5% of the time
More Azure Monitor Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
March 2025
Alluvio AppResponse reportDownload Alluvio AppResponse product report
Buyer's Guide
Azure Monitor
March 2025
Azure Monitor reportDownload Azure Monitor product report
 

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
No data available
 

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure. 

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts. 

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.  

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility. 

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor
March 2025
Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor
Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.