Alteryx vs Jedox comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Alteryx and Jedox solutions aren't in the same category. Alteryx is ranked #1 in PA , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 7.5% mindshare in the category. Jedox is ranked #13 in BPM , and holds a 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Alteryx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jedox users who would recommend it.

Alteryx

Read 87 Alteryx reviews

10,789 Views
2,050 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

2,732 Views
1,803 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Alteryx

Jedox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alteryx and Jedox based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Alteryx, SAP, Red Hat and others in Predictive Analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Predictive Analytics Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Predictive Analytics

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,262 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alteryx

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Predictive Analytics (1st), Data Science Platforms (5th), Data Preparation Tools (1st)

Jedox

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Performance Management (13th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Business Intelligence solutions, they serve different purposes. Alteryx is designed for Predictive Analytics and holds a mindshare of 7.5%, down 15.0% compared to last year.
Jedox, on the other hand, focuses on Business Performance Management, holds 3.1% mindshare, down 4.3% since last year.

Predictive Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Alteryx	7.5%
Red Hat Lightspeed	6.0%
DataRobot	6.0%
Other	80.5%

Predictive Analytics

Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jedox	3.1%
Anaplan	5.8%
Workday Adaptive Planning	5.6%
Other	85.5%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

ManojBehera

Senior Staff Cyber Security Cloud Data Architect at GE Healthcare

Automated complex ETL workflows have reduced coding effort and improved data integration

One area for improvement is in integrating mostly the data which comes from telemetry, where I can see some sort of improvisations can be made. It is a massive amount of unstructured data, and I believe Alteryx is able to handle it, but there can be some improvements. Suggestions for improvements in Alteryx include areas for increasing efficiency, particularly in processing telemetry data, which involves dealing with large volumes of unstructured data. Additionally, I believe when we use filter tools immediately after the input source, there can be slowdowns when handling massive data. The user experience of Alteryx is generally good, but there are areas for improvement from a user's perspective, particularly regarding user interface enhancements. I think there's always room for improvement, but otherwise, Alteryx has been a great tool for me. We haven't experienced significant disruptions while increasing data volumes, though I sense there could be performance issues as data grows exponentially. This is an area that could use improvement in Alteryx.

Read full review

Amol Ghoddke

Manager, Finance and Business Intelligence at NIDA Theatres

The solution provides dynamic reports while being easy to use

There is not much training for Jedox. There was no training available in the beginning at all. I had to reach out to them so they would give us something. I think they're getting better, though. The other issue is the dependence on the partner network. We used to deal directly with Jedox, but now it is all through partners, and Jedox's representatives are not in the picture anymore. It's not that partners are not doing a good job, but you're not dealing with the company directly since it's a partner most of the time. If you build your know-how within the company, it's good. Otherwise, the dependence on partners could end up being more costly. Suppose you do your development or don't need to develop constantly by starting with a sprint, deciding what you want to do, and setting up the cubes, databases, and everything correctly. In that case, you only need to develop different reports using the same data. However, it could be costly if you constantly need to develop reports or different cubes and store different systems without the in-house know-how.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution does a good job with data transformation."

"Overall, if you are looking for data management, if you need to improve your ability to blend data and to get insights out of data, Alteryx is the way to go."

"The initial setup is easy, straightforward, and simple, and within hours I can have the designer up and running."

"The scheduling feature for the automation is excellent."

"The ease-of-use allows non-technical business users to directly create their own solutions without the use of additional development resources."

"It is a stable and scalable solution."

"The support is very good overall; we are satisfied with their level of service, and they are knowledgeable and responsive."

"The tools are built-in; you just plug and play, drag and drop, and once you understand how to use the tools, it is easy."

More Alteryx pros

"The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features."

"We use the tool for performance management and planning."

"The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool."

"The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage."

"The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in."

"The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department."

"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."

"The customer porting is the most valuable feature."

More Jedox pros

Cons

"The product's pricing needs improvement."

"Configuration is very low."

"Mastering Alteryx, a comprehensive solution, takes time. However, once you have gained proficiency with its layout and how to drag, drop, and connect components, it becomes remarkably easy, yet still thorough."

"Alteryx can improve the model management and deployment processing of large workloads."

"The license is really expensive, we cannot afford to have two or three."

"The scalability worries me a lot at the moment because the cost of the solution is high and it is not growing considerably. Unfortunately, we started during early COVID times and because of the economic downturn, all the cost cuttings, and everything, it is not growing as expected."

"The solution can be made more affordable."

"The solution just lacks in terms of data visualization. That is why we use Tableau and Qlik in our organization. They help to pick up the slack. If data visualization was added, Alteryx would be a very good tool, and much more complete."

More Alteryx cons

"I don't find it particularly user-friendly."

"Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

"It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming."

"The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end."

"There is not much training for Jedox."

"There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself."

"The tool has changed its pricing and it's now too expensive for small and medium organizations. I miss the open-source version which was free and we could do a lot of things with it."

More Jedox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's probably on the pricey side, but they provide some really useful ways to grow and test."

"I don't know much about the licensing, but there are some additional costs for certain features."

"The pricing is $5000 per year per production license."

"It is $4,000 a year, so it is cheap versus other solutions. It also accomplishes three times the volume on the job in the same time (as the other solutions)."

"The designer license costs 5000 euros. The server edition is 1000 euros."

"A designer and scheduler for $13K/year in total is pretty much earning you the money back in time and in other resources."

"It is an expensive solution."

"While it offers extensive features, including predictive analytics, for those who mainly use it for data preparation and blending, the cost can be prohibitive."

More Alteryx pricing and cost advice

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"Excellent value for money."

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Predictive Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	56

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is the Biggest Difference Between Alteryx and IBM SPSS Modeler?

One of the differences is that with Alteryx you can use it as an ETL and analytics tool. Please connect with me directly if you want to know more.

See all answers

What is the Biggest Difference Between Alteryx and IBM SPSS Modeler?

Alteryx is an extremely easy and flexible data tool, flexible in terms of drag and drop toolset and also has python, R integrations if your team requires this. It can handle over 2 billion rows of...

See all answers

What is the Biggest Difference Between Alteryx and IBM SPSS Modeler?

I am not familiar with IBM SPSS Modeler, therefore, I cannot compare these two products. Regarding Alteryx I can say the following: - An excellent desktop tool for Data Prep and analytics. - Featu...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Databricks vs Alteryx

Compared 11% of the time

Dataiku vs Alteryx

Compared 7% of the time

KNIME Business Hub vs Alteryx

Compared 6% of the time

Altair RapidMiner vs Alteryx

Compared 5% of the time

DataRobot vs Alteryx

Compared 3% of the time

More Alteryx Competitors

IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Board vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Business Data Cloud vs Jedox

Compared 5% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Alteryx

September 2026

Download Alteryx product report

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

September 2026

Download Jedox product report

Also Known As

No data available

Jedox EPM

Overview

Alteryx provides user-friendly, no-code tools for data blending, preparation, and analysis. Its drag-and-drop interface and in-database capabilities simplify integration with data sources while maintaining data integrity.

Alteryx offers a comprehensive suite for automation of data workflows, reducing manual tasks and enhancing processing efficiency. Known for robust predictive and spatial analytics, it effectively handles large datasets. The platform's flexibility allows for custom script deployments, supported by a strong community. However, Alteryx faces challenges with high pricing, lack of cloud support, and limited data visualization tools. Users express a need for more in-built data science functionalities, improved API integration, and a smoother learning curve. Connectivity and documentation gaps, along with complex workflows, are noted concerns, suggesting areas for enhancement. Alteryx is widely used for tasks like ETL processes, data preparation, predictive modeling, and report generation, supporting functions like financial projections and spatial analysis.

What features define Alteryx?

Data Blending: Combines data from multiple sources.
No-Code Tools: User-friendly drag-and-drop interface for ease of use.
Automation: Streamlines workflows and reduces manual tasks.
Predictive Analytics: Offers advanced forecasting capabilities.
Spatial Analytics: Processes geospatial data effectively.

What benefits should users consider?

Reduced Manual Labor: Automation minimizes repetitive tasks.
Data Integration: Seamlessly connects to various data sources.
Customization: Flexibility to deploy custom scripts.
Scalability: Quickly processes large datasets.
Community Support: Strong network for troubleshooting and guidance.

Alteryx is implemented across industries for diverse needs such as anomaly detection in finance, customer segmentation in marketing, and tax automation in auditing. Teams leverage its capabilities for data blending and predictive modeling to enhance operational efficiency and address specific business needs effectively.

Alteryx

Jedox offers flexibility and customization for corporate performance management, focusing on financial consolidation, planning, budgeting, and forecasting. Its Excel and Power BI integrations and strong API connections enhance integration capabilities.

Jedox provides a user-friendly interface for comprehensive planning, allowing companies to create different cubes, facilitating intuitive dashboards, dynamic reporting, and advanced analytical features. Its powerful ETL functionality improves integration with diverse systems, making data entry and customizable reporting efficient. Although requiring implementation and maintenance efforts, Jedox proves effective in management reporting, financial analysis, and data transfer processes. However, visualization options, UI, scalability, and pricing structure could improve.

What are the key features of Jedox?

Flexibility and Customization: Adaptable planning with customizable cubes.
Excel Integration: Seamless integration for ease of use.
ETL Functionality: Enhanced data integration capabilities.
Intuitive Dashboard: User-friendly interface with dynamic reporting.
Power BI and API Connections: Strong integration with business tools.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Efficiency in Planning: Streamlined financial consolidation and budgeting processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Improved management reporting for stakeholders.
Data Integration: Effective data transfer capabilities within systems.
Scalability: Custom solutions for growing enterprise needs.

Companies in industries like hospitality use Jedox for tailored planning solutions such as room and meal planning. Organizations employ Jedox for creating ERP solutions, HR dashboards, and cost center reporting, utilizing it for financial analysis and integration needs.

Jedox

Sample Customers

AnalyticsIq Inc., belk, BloominBrands Inc., Cardinalhealth, Cineplex, Dairy Queen

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

Find out what your peers are saying about Alteryx, SAP, Red Hat and others in Predictive Analytics. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Predictive Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.