Alteryx vs Jedox comparison

The compared Alteryx and Jedox solutions aren't in the same category. Alteryx is ranked #1 in PA , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 7.8% mindshare in the category. Jedox is ranked #14 in BPM , and holds a 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Alteryx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jedox users who would recommend it.

Alteryx

Read 87 Alteryx reviews

9,566 Views
1,722 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Jedox

Read 13 Jedox reviews

2,428 Views
1,554 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Alteryx

Jedox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alteryx and Jedox based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Alteryx, SAP, Red Hat and others in Predictive Analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Predictive Analytics Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Predictive Analytics

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alteryx

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Predictive Analytics (1st), Data Science Platforms (5th), Data Preparation Tools (1st)

Jedox

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Performance Management (14th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Business Intelligence solutions, they serve different purposes. Alteryx is designed for Predictive Analytics and holds a mindshare of 7.8%, down 18.3% compared to last year.
Jedox, on the other hand, focuses on Business Performance Management, holds 3.2% mindshare, down 4.9% since last year.

Predictive Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Alteryx	7.8%
Red Hat Lightspeed	6.1%
DataRobot	6.0%
Other	80.1%

Predictive Analytics

Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jedox	3.2%
Anaplan	6.4%
Adaptive Insights	5.0%
Other	85.4%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

ManojBehera

Senior Staff Cyber Security Cloud Data Architect at GE Healthcare

Automated complex ETL workflows have reduced coding effort and improved data integration

One area for improvement is in integrating mostly the data which comes from telemetry, where I can see some sort of improvisations can be made. It is a massive amount of unstructured data, and I believe Alteryx is able to handle it, but there can be some improvements. Suggestions for improvements in Alteryx include areas for increasing efficiency, particularly in processing telemetry data, which involves dealing with large volumes of unstructured data. Additionally, I believe when we use filter tools immediately after the input source, there can be slowdowns when handling massive data. The user experience of Alteryx is generally good, but there are areas for improvement from a user's perspective, particularly regarding user interface enhancements. I think there's always room for improvement, but otherwise, Alteryx has been a great tool for me. We haven't experienced significant disruptions while increasing data volumes, though I sense there could be performance issues as data grows exponentially. This is an area that could use improvement in Alteryx.

Read full review

Amol Ghoddke

Manager, Finance and Business Intelligence at NIDA Theatres

The solution provides dynamic reports while being easy to use

There is not much training for Jedox. There was no training available in the beginning at all. I had to reach out to them so they would give us something. I think they're getting better, though. The other issue is the dependence on the partner network. We used to deal directly with Jedox, but now it is all through partners, and Jedox's representatives are not in the picture anymore. It's not that partners are not doing a good job, but you're not dealing with the company directly since it's a partner most of the time. If you build your know-how within the company, it's good. Otherwise, the dependence on partners could end up being more costly. Suppose you do your development or don't need to develop constantly by starting with a sprint, deciding what you want to do, and setting up the cubes, databases, and everything correctly. In that case, you only need to develop different reports using the same data. However, it could be costly if you constantly need to develop reports or different cubes and store different systems without the in-house know-how.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"After the implementation of Alteryx, the turnaround time has been reduced to 10 minutes or maybe in some cases, a couple of minutes."

"I found Alteryx's ability to modify data on the fly, using in-memory processing, very useful."

"Automation is the most valuable aspect for us. The ability to wrap business logic around the data is very helpful."

"The three data signs and data engineering are great features."

"Alteryx is user-friendly and allows easy creation of workflows compared to Informatica PowerCenter."

"The value add of Alteryx is the agility for making changes, and speed of deployment."

"If you are looking for a self-service data analytics tool, Alteryx is a good solution."

"I believe that the ability to leverage the gallery for scalability, as well as the general data blending functionality, is most beneficial to our core-based users."

More Alteryx pros

"The customer porting is the most valuable feature."

"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."

"The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department."

"The EPM is the most valuable feature."

"The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage."

"We use the tool for performance management and planning."

"The solution is very versatile."

"With Jedox, those kinds of pain points have been removed, and now if I create my dashboard once, people just need to add the data or pull the data, or the data just comes in on a scheduled basis from various systems, and my dashboards are ready."

More Jedox pros

Cons

"It should have Linux support. It currently supports only Windows. It does not support any other platform. Its price should also be lower. Their US partner management program is actually unresponsive. One of the reasons why we don't have a formalized partnership plan with them is because their partner management team is atrociously unresponsive. This is something that they need to change."

"In my opinion, Alteryx does have a zone to do predictive analytics, but it is very limited, so they could focus more on that."

"The product could benefit from improved integration with visualization tools or even the inclusion of built-in visualization features."

"We've had a lot of issues within the Alteryx Server. It really could be improved."

"All of the reports are migrated or exported in an Excel file, and most of the time, a business intelligence tool is required. They could have better reporting. The aesthetic could be improved."

"A colleague of mind mentioned that the solution should have more options for the visualization of data."

"The formula we currently use in Alteryx can be automated."

"The workflow and pipeline need to improve."

More Alteryx cons

"Visualization is something they need to improve. There should be some dropdown facilities in it like Excel."

"I think it's the design of the report because the design and the UI for the report is standard and lame. When you see a Jedox report, it doesn't seem like it's from today, because the technology is something from the last decade. The scalability needs improvement."

"The solution needs to improve its support. The visualization in Microsoft BI is more modern and comfortable than Jedox's. I would expect something similar with the solution."

"Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there."

"Jedox should improve the design and server issues."

"There is not much training for Jedox."

"Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement."

"From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."

More Jedox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The desktop platform costs $5,000 per year. It's very costly."

"The cost of Alteryx is approximately $2,900 annually."

"Opt for the three year subscription. It is 20% less than the yearly one."

"It is an expensive solution."

"My organization pays for it, and I do not look into the financial aspect of the licensing, but I know it is pretty expensive."

"In order to have designers, and, if you want to collaborate, you have to buy a server. If the designer is $5,000, and if you want a server, you have to pay $80,000."

"I rate the solution's pricing as a ten, as it is highly priced."

"ROI is huge. There are some secondary benefits, like analysts getting their post 5 PM time back or the ability to shorten all closing processes to a half or less."

More Alteryx pricing and cost advice

"Jedox was a bit cheaper compared to Calumo."

"We paid a one-time fee, which included product purchase, licensing, and first-time implementation. We are paying for the maintenance regularly."

"If you are using SAP, then you will have to take an SAP Connector license. The license across the tool is paying for the people who are using it as an admin or as a normal user. They can work out those costs in a manner that can help. This can also be a point of improvement where they can work out the costing, and the developers have a specific licensing cost. The normal users, who are going to do probably data entry or just going to view the dashboard, can have a separate license cost."

"The product’s pricing will not be suitable for setting up a small solution."

"The solution's pricing is specific to your requirements."

"Excellent value for money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Predictive Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	56

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is the Biggest Difference Between Alteryx and IBM SPSS Modeler?

One of the differences is that with Alteryx you can use it as an ETL and analytics tool. Please connect with me directly if you want to know more.

See all answers

What is the Biggest Difference Between Alteryx and IBM SPSS Modeler?

Alteryx is an extremely easy and flexible data tool, flexible in terms of drag and drop toolset and also has python, R integrations if your team requires this. It can handle over 2 billion rows of...

See all answers

What is the Biggest Difference Between Alteryx and IBM SPSS Modeler?

I am not familiar with IBM SPSS Modeler, therefore, I cannot compare these two products. Regarding Alteryx I can say the following: - An excellent desktop tool for Data Prep and analytics. - Featu...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Databricks vs Alteryx

Compared 13% of the time

Dataiku vs Alteryx

Compared 8% of the time

KNIME Business Hub vs Alteryx

Compared 7% of the time

Altair RapidMiner vs Alteryx

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat Lightspeed vs Alteryx

Compared 3% of the time

More Alteryx Competitors

Microsoft Power BI vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Board vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

Anaplan vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Planning Analytics vs Jedox

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Business Data Cloud vs Jedox

Compared 6% of the time

More Jedox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Alteryx

June 2026

Download Alteryx product report

Buyer's Guide

Jedox

June 2026

Download Jedox product report

Also Known As

No data available

Jedox EPM

Overview

Alteryx provides user-friendly, no-code tools for data blending, preparation, and analysis. Its drag-and-drop interface and in-database capabilities simplify integration with data sources while maintaining data integrity.

Alteryx offers a comprehensive suite for automation of data workflows, reducing manual tasks and enhancing processing efficiency. Known for robust predictive and spatial analytics, it effectively handles large datasets. The platform's flexibility allows for custom script deployments, supported by a strong community. However, Alteryx faces challenges with high pricing, lack of cloud support, and limited data visualization tools. Users express a need for more in-built data science functionalities, improved API integration, and a smoother learning curve. Connectivity and documentation gaps, along with complex workflows, are noted concerns, suggesting areas for enhancement. Alteryx is widely used for tasks like ETL processes, data preparation, predictive modeling, and report generation, supporting functions like financial projections and spatial analysis.

What features define Alteryx?

Data Blending: Combines data from multiple sources.
No-Code Tools: User-friendly drag-and-drop interface for ease of use.
Automation: Streamlines workflows and reduces manual tasks.
Predictive Analytics: Offers advanced forecasting capabilities.
Spatial Analytics: Processes geospatial data effectively.

What benefits should users consider?

Reduced Manual Labor: Automation minimizes repetitive tasks.
Data Integration: Seamlessly connects to various data sources.
Customization: Flexibility to deploy custom scripts.
Scalability: Quickly processes large datasets.
Community Support: Strong network for troubleshooting and guidance.

Alteryx is implemented across industries for diverse needs such as anomaly detection in finance, customer segmentation in marketing, and tax automation in auditing. Teams leverage its capabilities for data blending and predictive modeling to enhance operational efficiency and address specific business needs effectively.

Alteryx

Jedox offers flexibility and customization for corporate performance management, focusing on financial consolidation, planning, budgeting, and forecasting. Its Excel and Power BI integrations and strong API connections enhance integration capabilities.

Jedox provides a user-friendly interface for comprehensive planning, allowing companies to create different cubes, facilitating intuitive dashboards, dynamic reporting, and advanced analytical features. Its powerful ETL functionality improves integration with diverse systems, making data entry and customizable reporting efficient. Although requiring implementation and maintenance efforts, Jedox proves effective in management reporting, financial analysis, and data transfer processes. However, visualization options, UI, scalability, and pricing structure could improve.

What are the key features of Jedox?

Flexibility and Customization: Adaptable planning with customizable cubes.
Excel Integration: Seamless integration for ease of use.
ETL Functionality: Enhanced data integration capabilities.
Intuitive Dashboard: User-friendly interface with dynamic reporting.
Power BI and API Connections: Strong integration with business tools.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Efficiency in Planning: Streamlined financial consolidation and budgeting processes.
Enhanced Reporting: Improved management reporting for stakeholders.
Data Integration: Effective data transfer capabilities within systems.
Scalability: Custom solutions for growing enterprise needs.

Companies in industries like hospitality use Jedox for tailored planning solutions such as room and meal planning. Organizations employ Jedox for creating ERP solutions, HR dashboards, and cost center reporting, utilizing it for financial analysis and integration needs.

Jedox

Sample Customers

AnalyticsIq Inc., belk, BloominBrands Inc., Cardinalhealth, Cineplex, Dairy Queen

BP, Fiat, Carrefour, Continental, Allianz, Bacardi, McDonald’s, Netafim, Swiss Post, Telstra, Suzuki, Vodafone, University of Western Australia, Unilever

Find out what your peers are saying about Alteryx, SAP, Red Hat and others in Predictive Analytics. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Predictive Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.