Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Jedox Logo

Jedox pros and cons

Vendor: Jedox
4.0 out of 5
208 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Jedox offers extensive flexibility in creating diverse cubes for comprehensive planning and data handling.
ETL functionality is integrated seamlessly, simplifying tasks and enabling data extraction and loading within the same tool.
The system supports quick analysis and calculation, aiding in efficient performance management and planning.
High levels of digitalization in Jedox improve department control efficiency, reducing the need for additional personnel.
The versatility of Jedox allows for complete freedom in solution configuration.

CONS

Jedox encounters performance issues with heavy reports due to handling large volumes of data, which could be improved with buffer memory features.
The implementation process of Jedox is complex and time-consuming, requiring extensive learning and training to convert business requirements into functional solutions.
Jedox's recent pricing changes make it expensive for small to medium organizations, and the loss of the open-source version limits cost-effective options.
The report designing area in Jedox requires improvement to ease the management process, as current designs and UI appear outdated.
Jedox lacks sufficient training resources, which forces users to seek additional help unless they undertake specific courses to master report creation.
 

Jedox Pros review quotes

AG
Jul 19, 2023
The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features.
AU
Dec 10, 2020
The system is quite flexible. Based on our requirements, we create different cubes that can help us to do complete planning.
Peter Berge - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 23, 2023
We can configure and have complete freedom while creating solutions.
Learn what your peers think about Jedox. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Mike Potashnick - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 13, 2023
The ETL function simplifies many tasks.
Filip Devisch - PeerSpot reviewer
May 5, 2023
The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage.
reviewer2226621 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 3, 2023
The solution is very versatile.
Riyaz Halani - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 19, 2023
The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in.
reviewer1471602 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 28, 2022
The data entry point is most valuable. The way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good.
HS
Jun 19, 2023
The solution is quick with analysis and calculation. The tool offers high digitalization which helps us to run the controlling department with less number of people. If the software wasn't there, I would need two to three people extra to run the department.
reviewer2213898 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 16, 2023
The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool.
 

Jedox Cons review quotes

AG
Jul 19, 2023
There is not much training for Jedox.
AU
Dec 10, 2020
Being an analytical solution, it should have more visualization options like graphs. When we are putting it, it should have more options. The UI can be made more modernized based on today's market. Sometimes, when we are doing heavy reports or dashboarding, there is a bit of a performance issue because it is pulling up a huge amount of data. That can be improvised by buffer memory and getting some buffer memory feature into it. It is a bit complex because it is a CPM solution. It helps you to get the information based on the different tools that we are using, which is a bit of a complex thing. It is not as easy as Microsoft Power BI. It is also not that easy as an implementation piece. It takes time to convert the business requirement into the proper solutions in the tool, which is time-consuming. It took about eight months to do the complete implementation. We got some training from the partner and the Jedox team, which helped us later on in pulling things forward, but too much learning is required, and too many possibilities are there.
Peter Berge - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 23, 2023
The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end.
Learn what your peers think about Jedox. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Mike Potashnick - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 13, 2023
From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process.
Filip Devisch - PeerSpot reviewer
May 5, 2023
Online pixel-perfect reporting is an aspect that has room for improvement.
reviewer2226621 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 3, 2023
I don't find it particularly user-friendly.
Riyaz Halani - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 19, 2023
There is room for improvement in the scalability. It is a very massive tool. It's not easy to just build everything yourself.
reviewer1471602 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 28, 2022
Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it.
HS
Jun 19, 2023
The solution needs to improve its support. The visualization in Microsoft BI is more modern and comfortable than Jedox's. I would expect something similar with the solution.
reviewer2213898 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 16, 2023
I think it's the design of the report because the design and the UI for the report is standard and lame. When you see a Jedox report, it doesn't seem like it's from today, because the technology is something from the last decade. The scalability needs improvement.